----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Ough" <simon.orange@NOSPAMbtinternet.com>
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: Three's agreement with O2
> "R. Mark Clayton" <nospamclayton@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:tu6dnfRG8tXmGwXZnZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>> No it isn't, unless you have shares in O, O is a 1G8Hz operator with much
>> less coverage than O2 / Voda who are 900 / 1800.
>
> Do you have proof of that? Orange have at least 30% more masts than O2 or
> Voda, so there should be no difference. In fact in Cornwall, in one of the
> most challenging areas of England to cover, Orange is the best network
> hands down for signal.
>
> Simon
>
> PS: Would be less confusing if you used 1800MHz, not 1G8Hz
>
"much" was probably now incorrect. The network coverage used to be
Voda > O2 > Orange > T-Mobile > 3
http://www.intersites.co.uk/9917/ gives some comparison, but states that
Voda, O2 and Orange have >99% with T-Mobile catching up.
See also
http://coverage.orange.co.uk/uk/UKCoverageSearch.htm
which does have a lot of Orange in Cornwall.