>> If I pop onto SID 1711 (ATTWS Houston/Lufkin area) and actually connect
>> using TDMA, will I be billed as a roaming call or would I be billed
>> normally? SID 1711 is most definetly in the PRL, and all of 1711 is
>> AMPS/TDMA.
>>
>You MAY be able to use AMPS, but I would think that ATT IRDB is going to
>keep you on ATT affiliates that Verizon also uses.
True, although some phones let you program a local SID which will override the
IRDB.
>As far as using TDMA, forget it. The network is not going to allow you.
>The Verizon phone number and ESN will be unknown when a call is trying
>to be set up.
>
>But hey, give it a shot, experimenting is fun.
Interesting idea and I just tried it. Amazingly it worked for me. I activated a
6120 and it worked in both TDMA, analog (USC) and analog (Verizon) modes. I
could make and receive calls on all three (I never answered because I don't want
to pay $0.69 for each try).
Verizon has a roaming agreement with my local "A" TDMA carrier, USC. Since it
is not part of AC (SID 445), using it would incur roaming charges.
Since Verizon does not have a roaming agreement with AT&T in my area (AT&T is
TDMA 1900 MHz-only, so why would they have a roaming agreement?), I could not
use my 6160 phone (it did activate & worked when I got it to roam on USC TDMA).
Would you be charged if you connect to a SID in the AC PRL, even if you connect
via TDMA? Very interesting question. I would think probably not, but you'd
have to try it and see.
--
Dave
Visit my New England Cell Phone Page at
http://markson.net/cell_phones.htm
(to reply take out the "remove" in my e-mail)