Re: Ouch! Time Warner Denounces other Cell Phones!

Larry wrote:
> Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in news:im-
> 9C8513.01441317112007@mpls-nnrp-06.inet.qwest.net:
>
>> itunes has over 6,000,000 songs, the largest online library in
> the world.
>
> Not true. USENET has the largest online library in the world.
>
> Larry
True that!

Larry wrote:
> "IMHO IIRC" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.NOSPAM> wrote in news:Nzu%i.840$mY1.562
> @newsfe24.lga:
>
>> Music More than 6 million songs. 99½ each.
>> Movies New and classic films from $9.99.
>> Music Videos More than 11,000, $1.99 each.
>> TV Shows 600 shows at $1.99 an episode.
>> iPod Games $4.99 each. Countless hours of fun.
> Music - billions of songs. FREE - alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.(genre)
> Movies - thousands. FREE - alt.binaries.movies.divx
> Music Videos - FREE alt.binaries.multimedia.(many places)
> TV Shows - FREE alt.binaries.hdtv or alt.binaries.tv.(genre)
> iPod Games - They must be there, somewhere...(c;
>
> Don't bull**** me and tell me you don't download. If you don't
> download, it's because you don't know how...(c;
>
> Larry
iPod Games - FREE (http://ipodstuff.org/?page_id=21)
These hacked games only work if you have a 5G or 5.5G (iPod Video)
iPods. All but 1 5/5.5G game has been hacked, the unhacked game being
Phase)

"Bill Gates" <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in message
news:im-12E4BD.21342216112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...


#$@! Oxtard sock puppet

"Bill Gates" <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in message
news:im-9C8513.01441317112007@mpls-nnrp-06.inet.qwest.net...


#$@! Oxtard sock puppet

Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:

> > itunes has over 6,000,000 songs, the largest online library in
> the world.
> >
>
> Not true. USENET has the largest online library in the world.

but not of high quality, much less legal. and no, usenet doesn't have
6,000,000 unique tracks, not even close.

maybe Gnutella/Limewire based networks, but it's still a bit of a
crapshoot to find consistent quality like itunes has. but yes, way
better than usenet.

-

CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> > 2,000,000 of them are free of DRM and of higher quality than other
> > music stores and just .99 cents.
>
> Higher quality how?

they are all 256k AAC, not cheap, 1990's sounding MP3s.

Advanced Audio Coding is the modern, fully open replacement for MP3's

AAC is the successor to the MP3 format by MP3¹s creator, Fraunhofer IIS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding

now you know.

"Bill Gates" <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in message
news:im-1A2CA9.10000817112007@mpls-nnrp-02.inet.qwest.net...


#$@! Oxtard sock puppet

Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in news:im-EDAD44.10054117112007
@mpls-nnrp-02.inet.qwest.net:

> CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
>
>> > 2,000,000 of them are free of DRM and of higher quality than other
>> > music stores and just .99 cents.
>>
>> Higher quality how?
>
> they are all 256k AAC, not cheap, 1990's sounding MP3s.
>
> Advanced Audio Coding is the modern, fully open replacement for MP3's
>
> AAC is the successor to the MP3 format by MP3¹s creator, Fraunhofer IIS.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding
>
> now you know.
>

Sorry, mumbnuts- there are plenty of places besides iTunes to find lossless
music.

CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> Sorry, mumbnuts- there are plenty of places besides iTunes to find lossless
> music.

and can you please point me to a location where i said there wasn't?

nope!

cozmic is completely obsessed with my level of knowledge, too funny!

by the way, iTunes nor any Music service "legally" sells lossless songs,
they'd be too huge to even make sense.

-

Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in
news:im-DF5864.22250217112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net:

> CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, mumbnuts- there are plenty of places besides iTunes to find
>> lossless music.

But a few lines down you say that they don't sell lossless music- which is
it, moron?

>
> and can you please point me to a location where i said there wasn't?
>
> nope!
>
> cozmic is completely obsessed with my level of knowledge, too funny!

True to a point- I've never encountered somebody so clueless about the
stuff that they post about.

>
> by the way, iTunes nor any Music service "legally" sells lossless
> songs, they'd be too huge to even make sense.
>
> -
>

You sure about that? Is this kinda like the $700 laptop that doesn't
exist, but does? You want to research that a little bit more before making
such a claim?

hint- I already have a company in mind that does legally sell lossless
media, without even having to research the subject.

Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in news:im-
1A2CA9.10000817112007@mpls-nnrp-02.inet.qwest.net:

> but not of high quality, much less legal. and no, usenet
doesn't have
> 6,000,000 unique tracks, not even close.
>
>

Not all at once, but there are about 5000 DVD+Rs full of MP3,
FLAC, etc., in huge racks on the wall that say otherwise over the
long term...(c;

One of these days they're going to stop it. When that happens, I
will simply disconnect and spend the rest of my life "catching
up" on stuff I've never heard.

About "high quality"......"High quality" what? Rock? Hip-Hop?
What nonsense. You boys remind me of the audiofools who used to
record at 15 ips on massive reels of really expensive tapes...(c;

I want you to test YOU. Go to an audiologist and tell him you
want your hearing scanned and YOUR response graphed. The graph
in ANY human, including YOU, looks just like the outline of the
Swiss Alps from 30 miles away. The only limit to how the music
sounds is between YOUR ears! Those born into the "kilowatt amp
era" will find their hearing so impared spending over $10 for a
pair of cheap headphones is a total travesty. Try it, I dare
you! Ask your doctor who can do it, so he gets his cut.

Now, find an expensive DJ setup in a place like Guitar Center or
other big music store that sells DJ equipment. Take the cheapest
MP3 player you can find, mine was free with a portable drill from
Mitsubishi, and put it in your pocket loaded up with your
favorite music and an adapter cable with mini phone plug for the
player to RCA plugs for the audio board at the store. Tell the
salesman you want to hear YOUR music played on the biggest, not
most expensive, speakers in the stack from any of the amps.
Doesn't that sound just great?! Is it all distorted? The player
volume control is too high overdriving the audio board's input
amp....just turn the player down and the gain on the board up.

Since analog audio was dumped with the advent of the CD, audio
has been sampled at 44.1Kbps and humans cannot tell the
difference because they can't hear above about 10-11 kHz, anyway.
(Audiologist test will prove your high end limit rolloff).
Paying extra for audio bandwidth above what you can sense is
STUPID! RIAA Equalization hasn't changed since the invention of
FM in the 40's. Music is recorded from 50-15000 Hz...NO MATTER
WHAT. FM radio's audio bandwidth is why. Music is to SELL, not
be the greatest adverture on the planet. FCC regulations limit
the FM transmitter's modulation index to protect adjacent
channels from interference, so we limit the audio bandwidth
accordingly or there's hell-to-pay on an inspection. 44.1Kbps
doesn't distort 15Khz unless you have some really expensive
measuring equipment, which you don't. So, it's fine.

MP3 compression above 64 Kbps on a 44.1Kbps audio wave sample is
also wasteful and stupid. Most MP3 samples at 128Kbps add no
perceptable change, at all, to the 44.1Kbps audio sample rate of
the CD the music came off of.....or of the MP3 sample the radio
station is probably playing off satellite compression, either.
What you get from excessive sample rates is the fast compression
can also compress any high frequency pink noise present that gets
wiped out by the slower compression.

I'm sorry, but that's reality. NOTHING you have is a live
performance that hasn't already been bastardized by digital
conversion...starting at a mere 44.1 Khz on that CD in your hand.
Hell, it doesn't even have error correction....

When you head out to the DJ store, put some 64Kbps and 128Kbps on
the player with the 320Kbps oversampling nonsense. Play it
through the big speakers and tell me you can REALLY hear the
difference. If you can, you must have some canine ancestors that
gave you an extraordinary hearing sensors. Noone else
can.....EXCEPT IN THEIR MINDS from the brainwashing and
marketing.


Larry
--
Xterm IS the ultimate video game...(c;

Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in news:im-
EDAD44.10054117112007@mpls-nnrp-02.inet.qwest.net:

> they are all 256k AAC, not cheap, 1990's sounding MP3s.
>
> Advanced Audio Coding is the modern, fully open replacement for
MP3's
>
> AAC is the successor to the MP3 format by MP3ûs creator,
Fraunhofer IIS.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding
>
> now you know.
>
>

Pure horse****. The audio is 50-15000 Hz. The original sampling
is 44.1Kbps. It sounds great, doesn't it?!

Larry
--
Xterm IS the ultimate video game...(c;

CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> >> Sorry, mumbnuts- there are plenty of places besides iTunes to find
> >> lossless music.
>
> But a few lines down you say that they don't sell lossless music- which is
> it, moron?

can't read can you? look above. I said, "there are plenty of places
besides iTunes to find lossless music". that is 100% correct.

do you agree?

> > by the way, iTunes nor any Music service "legally" sells lossless
> > songs, they'd be too huge to even make sense.
> >
>
> You sure about that? Is this kinda like the $700 laptop that doesn't
> exist, but does? You want to research that a little bit more before making
> such a claim?

Well, then provide a Music Service that sells "lossless" music. I'm not
doubting there are some out there, but none of the top 20 sites do.

> hint- I already have a company in mind that does legally sell lossless
> media, without even having to research the subject.

oh, boy! what is your secret!

Bill Gates <im@IEdiedtoday.com> wrote in
news:im-8970A1.22170718112007@mpls-nnrp-06.inet.qwest.net:

> CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
>
>> >> Sorry, mumbnuts- there are plenty of places besides iTunes to find
>> >> lossless music.
>>
>> But a few lines down you say that they don't sell lossless music-
>> which is it, moron?
>
> can't read can you? look above. I said, "there are plenty of places
> besides iTunes to find lossless music". that is 100% correct.
>
> do you agree?

Sorry, simpleton- you better go back and check the archives. I said that,
not you.

Lying again, Oxtard?

>
>> > by the way, iTunes nor any Music service "legally" sells lossless
>> > songs, they'd be too huge to even make sense.
>> >
>>
>> You sure about that? Is this kinda like the $700 laptop that doesn't
>> exist, but does? You want to research that a little bit more before
>> making such a claim?
>
> Well, then provide a Music Service that sells "lossless" music. I'm
> not doubting there are some out there, but none of the top 20 sites
> do.
>

That's not what you said earlier:

"by the way, iTunes nor any Music service "legally" sells lossless
songs, they'd be too huge to even make sense."

You said nobody sells lossless music.

You're so stupid you can't even keep your story straight.