Apple To Own Wireless 700Mhz Network

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > And your point is? Everything points to you as the poster.
>
> Oxfart posts something here, and when questioned about its source, goes
> to that forum and says "but look, it's published elsewhere"--when in
> reality that "forum" simply reposts whatever anyone posts to the Usenet.

they are not talking about that elmo. what i posted came from yahoo's
message board, not usenet. learn to read.

---

› See More: Apple To Own Wireless 700Mhz Network

Oxford wrote:
> why are you so obsessed with me?

Why are you so obsessed with making yerself look like a fool, fool?

Jack Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >i'll be sure to let the author know your thoughts.
>
> Why don't you just tell us who the author was?

it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
found it.

Yahoo message board - http://tinyurl.com/2mgk3q
Posted by "ace_92029"
"http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029

i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me. i
was just the carrier pigeon.

CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> No- you're clueless on a totally different level. You don't have any clue
> at all about the technology, as shown by your blind acceptance of
> information found in the net. This thread has cemented the fact that you
> know nothing and havew no first hand experience with any of this stuff.
> You are simply an adolescent fanboi who gets all information from someplace
> else, without knowing the accuracy of that data.

why so obsessed with me then?

does telling the truth really hurt you that much?

i guess so.

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
[email protected]:

> Jack Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >i'll be sure to let the author know your thoughts.
>>
>> Why don't you just tell us who the author was?
>
> it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
> found it.
>
> Yahoo message board - http://tinyurl.com/2mgk3q
> Posted by "ace_92029"
> "http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029
>
> i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me. i
> was just the carrier pigeon.
>

That would be the clueless carrier pigeon, newbie.

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
>
>> No- you're clueless on a totally different level. You don't have any
>> clue at all about the technology, as shown by your blind acceptance
>> of information found in the net. This thread has cemented the fact
>> that you know nothing and havew no first hand experience with any of
>> this stuff. You are simply an adolescent fanboi who gets all
>> information from someplace else, without knowing the accuracy of that
>> data.
>
> why so obsessed with me then?

It's my civic responsibility to expose you for the fraud that you are. On
top of that. it's fun making you look like an idiot.

>
> does telling the truth really hurt you that much?

Doesn't hurt me at all, newbie- I do it all the time. You might want to
try it sometime.

>
> i guess so.
>

That's all you do- guess.

"Kevin Weaver" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Appears the only place Goggle could find this was in one place...
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/34lt5r
> >
> > My gawd...you are so clueless.
>
> And if you go back to read it again, It posted by Oxturd. His name is at the
> top.

talk about clueless Kevin, you win the award for the above comment.

what you pulled up was just a mirror of usenet in a phpBB format.

the post didn't originate with me, you were just too clueless to
understand that.

the mildly smarter DTC found the correct info, just as I had said.

http://tinyurl.com/2mgk3q

the joke is on you Kevin!

George <[email protected]> wrote:

> When you author a post as you did with no attribution you are taking
> full responsibility for the accuracy because they are *your words*.

go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
[email protected]:

> George <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When you author a post as you did with no attribution you are taking
>> full responsibility for the accuracy because they are *your words*.
>
> go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
> information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.
>

And there lies the problem, newbie- most of us would rather post something
factual, as opposed to "interesting". The fact that you posted it all
simply shows that you know nothing about the subject.

DTC <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oxford wrote:
> > why are you so obsessed with me?
>
> Why are you so obsessed with making yerself look like a fool, fool?

you don't have to get nasty about it. I'm a helpful person filled with
exciting news about the future of the cell industry.

apple is going to totally transform it, so I'm here to keep you up to
date.

yes, you're welcome!

Oxford wrote:
> Jack Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> i'll be sure to let the author know your thoughts.
>> Why don't you just tell us who the author was?
>
> it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
> found it.
>
> Yahoo message board - http://tinyurl.com/2mgk3q
> Posted by "ace_92029"
> "http://profiles.yahoo.com/ace_92029
>
> i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me. i
> was just the carrier pigeon.
Yes, and that guy is SO CREDITABLE!

What I am saying is that you should not believe everything you hear on
the internet and usenet

Oxford wrote:
> "Ness Net" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Well, here's the word. Apple with or without Google/AT&T will bid on the
>>> 700Mhz spectrum that will be auctioned by the US Government in January
>>> of 2008.
>> As we all know by now - Oxtard is (always) wrong.
>>
>> Here is the real deal...
>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,13...l?tk=nl_dnxnws
>>
>> Google is making the necessary preparations to bid for wireless spectrum in
>> an auction be held in the U.S. in January
>>
>> The company is planning to finance that bid alone, without partners,
>> according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
>
> You are forgetting that Apple and Google are partners in many areas,
> Eric even sits on Apple's Board of Directors so what Steve says, Eric
> does.
So? They don't need Apple to slow them down anymore.
>
> Google simply doesn't have any experience in hardware, nor any sales
> experience to go it alone, and while an mutual Apple/Google bid is
> possible. Apple can easily outbid Google if needed.
No, Apple cannot outbid google.

And guess what, GOOGLE HAS SALES EXPERIENCE!

At 17 Nov 2007 22:03:50 -0700 Oxford wrote:

> it's no great secret, DTC had nothing better to do so he dug around and
> found it.


So you plagarised it, then denied writing it when told how full of holes
it was, then lied and said you couldn't post a link because it was posted
on a subscription-only forum.

Nice usenet cred you have there, Oxy!


> i did feel like digging it up, so now go ***** at the author, not me.. i
> was just the carrier pigeon.



At 7 Sep 2007, 12:12*pm, Oxford wrote:

> " I only use facts which helps my cause"


You're a carrier pigeon who needs a fact checker...

"Oxford" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
> information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.

Yes, you "don't care" about the truth - that has been proven repeatedly.

Now... if you'd admit to trolling & sock puppets primarily to be an asshole,
we'd actually be getting somewhere.

"Oxford" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> why are you so obsessed with me?

Why are YOU so "obsessed" with trolling groups with fanboy crap?
Why are YOU post complete crap where it doesn't belong.
Why do YOU try so hard to be a complete ass?

Answer those - and you will have answered your question.