Vodafone TERRIFIED of iPhone - Seeks Restraining Order!

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:


>
> SJ will own the cell market in that amount of time, he gained 72% of
> the much more competitive MP3 market in 4 years,


Huh? There was no mp3 market, you moron. Apple is entering a mature
market here- something that they have little success with.



> so commanding the
> cell industry is a piece of cake since there are no strong players.
>
>> > vodafone, is freaking out since they lost the apple contract, so
>> > they are crying out... into court... verizon is next to cry wolf,
>> > just watch.
>>
>> Vodafone is questioning the sales practices, not the phone, stupid.
>> Laws in Europe are much different than they are here.
>
> Ah, they are still fearful, sales practices shouldn't matter to a
> court,

Only on the distant planet of Oxturd. You know it- the one with no
intelligent signs of life on it.


> customer demand is what matters and everyone has voted for the
> iPhone to be No. 1 worldwide.

Hardly, newbie.

>
>> And why would Verizon cry wolf when they are once again signing up
>> more new customers than AT&T?
>
> Verizon is dying, they lost the iPhone contract because of their own
> bungling, and have been in defensive mode ever since.

Dying? Hardly. They are positioned to overtake AT&T as the largest US
carrier WITHOUT the crapphone.

>
> If a cell handset maker doesn't win Apple's good graces, they are no
> longer a viable company.

Nokia, Samsung and LG all say hello.

>
> -
>

---

› See More: Vodafone TERRIFIED of iPhone - Seeks Restraining Order!

CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:

> > in the the country of Germany. They can't stand the iPhone's pressure,
> > so are seeking court relief before they go under.
>
> Go under? Aren't they the largest cell company on the planet?

yes, thanks for proving my point. Vodafone is financially weak and
likely can't survive the advancements of the iPhone in their
non-competitive markets.

SJ tends to calls these firms "squishy".

Now you know.

-

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote:
>
>> > in the the country of Germany. They can't stand the iPhone's
>> > pressure, so are seeking court relief before they go under.
>>
>> Go under? Aren't they the largest cell company on the planet?
>
> yes, thanks for proving my point. Vodafone is financially weak and
> likely can't survive the advancements of the iPhone in their
> non-competitive markets.

Cite?

>
> SJ tends to calls these firms "squishy".

I thought that's how he described your attempts to have his baby.

>
> Now you know.
>
That would make one of us knowing something.

"Oxford" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snip>
>> SJ will be nothing but an afterthought in the cell industry by 2015.
>
> SJ will own the cell market in that amount of time, he gained 72% of the
> much more competitive MP3 market in 4 years, so commanding the cell
> industry is a piece of cake since there are no strong players.

hahahhaaaaaaaa! much more competitive mp3 market! how many companies made
mp3s when apple entered, and how many people had mp3 players? compare that
to the cell industry?

<snip>
>> And why would Verizon cry wolf when they are once again signing up more
>> new
>> customers than AT&T?
>
> Verizon is dying, they lost the iPhone contract because of their own
> bungling, and have been in defensive mode ever since.

first, they didn't 'lose' the iphone- they declined it. in the first full
quarter after the iphone was introduced, both verizon and at&t have
reported... verizon added 1.6million customers, almost all postpaid (the
post profitable and desirable kind), to at&t's 2million, of which 1.2million
are postpaid, and verizon's churn was an industry low 1.21% to at&t's 1.7%.
revenue at both companies up 14.4%.

so much for your claime they'd fade quarter by quarter, eh?

> If a cell handset maker doesn't win Apple's good graces, they are no
> longer a viable company.

how do you rectify that statement with vz's financial results?

In article
<[email protected]>,
Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, thanks for proving my point. Vodafone is financially weak and
> likely can't survive the advancements of the iPhone in their
> non-competitive markets.
>
> Steve Jobs tends to calls these firms "squishy".
>
> Now you know.

On a side note, that must mean that Windoze users and Wintrolls are
squishy for not educating themselves on OS alternatives and kowtowing to
Ballmer.

--
Posted from my 1999 Apple G4 Sawtooth
A 450 MHz G4 running OS X 10.4.8

DTC <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ummm...the suit is about business practices.

yes, but only under the thin guise of... ****! --- the iPhone is selling
far better than we expected. It's eating our business alive, let's sue!

Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
[email protected]:

> DTC <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ummm...the suit is about business practices.
>
> yes, but only under the thin guise of... ****! --- the iPhone is selling
> far better than we expected. It's eating our business alive, let's sue!
>

Funny- I don't see mention of that ANYWHERE but out of your disabled brain.

Oxford wrote:
> DTC <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ummm...the suit is about business practices.
>
> yes, but only under the thin guise of... ****! --- the iPhone is selling
> far better than we expected. It's eating our business alive, let's sue!
Its cause of the hype.

Next year it will be a long forgotten memory, like AppleTV

Jon wrote:
> AppleTV

Is THAT still around??

"DTC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Jon wrote:
>> AppleTV
>
> Is THAT still around??

There are pallets of dusty Apple TV's for like $99 dollars at Costco. LOL

IronFist <[email protected]> wrote in news:201120070834535545%
[email protected]:

> In article <[email protected]>, CozmicDebris
> wrote:
>
>> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
>> [email protected]:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > -
>> >
>> > Gosh people! just get an iPhone and get on with life... no other Cell
>> > Carrier is going to be able to compete against Apple in the handset
>> > market,
>>
>>
>> Yo stupid- Apple is not a cell carrier.
>>
>
>
> Learn to read, moron. He didn't claim they are.
>

If he says that "no other Cell Carrier is going to be able to compete
against Apple in the handset market," he is most certainly stating that
Apple is a cell carrier. If he had said "no cell carrier," you would be
correct.

Learn to read, moron.

"CozmicDebris" <isheforreal> stated in post
[email protected] on 11/19/07 10:46 PM:

> IronFist <[email protected]> wrote in news:201120070834535545%
> [email protected]:
>
>> In article <[email protected]>, CozmicDebris
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
>>> [email protected]:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>> Gosh people! just get an iPhone and get on with life... no other Cell
>>>> Carrier is going to be able to compete against Apple in the handset
>>>> market,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yo stupid- Apple is not a cell carrier.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Learn to read, moron. He didn't claim they are.
>>
>
> If he says that "no other Cell Carrier is going to be able to compete
> against Apple in the handset market," he is most certainly stating that
> Apple is a cell carrier. If he had said "no cell carrier," you would be
> correct.
>
> Learn to read, moron.

Your interpretation is flawed. Ironic given your tone.

Hint: if he believes Apple will *become* a cell carrier that does not mean
he thinks they *are* one now.

Funny how you share similar reading comprehension challenges with someone
else in your neck of the woods - and then lash out at others when your
errors are pointed out. No relation between you two though... right?



--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)

MuahMan wrote:
>
> "DTC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Jon wrote:
>>> AppleTV
>>
>> Is THAT still around??
>
> There are pallets of dusty Apple TV's for like $99 dollars at Costco. LOL
Yep, AppleTV was epic failure by Apple.

"Snit" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:C367C49A.9A3A2%[email protected]...
> "CozmicDebris" <isheforreal> stated in post
> [email protected] on 11/19/07 10:46 PM:
>
>> IronFist <[email protected]> wrote in news:201120070834535545%
>> [email protected]:
>>
>>> In article <[email protected]>, CozmicDebris
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oxford <[email protected]> wrote in news:linuxlovesosx-
>>>> [email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> Gosh people! just get an iPhone and get on with life... no other Cell
>>>>> Carrier is going to be able to compete against Apple in the handset
>>>>> market,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yo stupid- Apple is not a cell carrier.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Learn to read, moron. He didn't claim they are.
>>>
>>
>> If he says that "no other Cell Carrier is going to be able to compete
>> against Apple in the handset market," he is most certainly stating that
>> Apple is a cell carrier. If he had said "no cell carrier," you would be
>> correct.
>>
>> Learn to read, moron.
>
> Your interpretation is flawed. Ironic given your tone.
>
> Hint: if he believes Apple will *become* a cell carrier that does not mean
> he thinks they *are* one now.
>
> Funny how you share similar reading comprehension challenges with someone
> else in your neck of the woods - and then lash out at others when your
> errors are pointed out. No relation between you two though... right?
>
>
>
> --
> If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
> Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
>
>
Awwwww, look at the Mactards sticking up for one another. Snit defending
Oxford's thousand newsgroup spam, what a shocker! And no, I won't show you
where you defended him. So keep your retard circus to the other ****ing
imbecile mactards.

We really have got to find a way to euthanize all Mac users. They are all
big-government liberals anyway.

"Jon" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> MuahMan wrote:
>>
>> "DTC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> Jon wrote:
>>>> AppleTV
>>>
>>> Is THAT still around??
>>
>> There are pallets of dusty Apple TV's for like $99 dollars at Costco. LOL
> Yep, AppleTV was epic failure by Apple.

It simply can't be. Oxtard said it was poised to take over the world and put
all the Cable companies out of business by 2010.