reply to discussion
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Todd Allcock
    Guest
    At 05 Dec 2007 06:24:19 -0800 -hh wrote:

    > Hopefully, someone here can recall what I was referring to and suggest
    > an appropriate research tool.



    I can't help you as to a site that gives all carriers' info, but I've found
    the interactive street-level coverage map at T-Mobile to be dead-accurate.
    AT&T's seems to be a little generous to AT&T, but if their map says no
    service, you can believe it. If it says "poor" (or whatever the lowest
    grade is) I'd take it with a gran of salt.

    Sprint has a similar street-level map on their site, but I can't vouch for
    it's accuracy since I don't have and Sprint phones to compare it's results
    with.


    > What I'm specifically trying to find is what the signal strength is
    > like for a non-VZW network cellphone when on "West Orange Mountain".
    > This is a stretch of I-280 in West Orange, NJ, roughly at the
    > intersection of I-280 and 636 and is a hilly section that is locally
    > notorious for very bad winter conditions and it used to be a very bad
    > dead spot on everyone's cell networks except Verizon.
    >
    > I'm trying to find out without personally driving over there with a
    > non-VZW cellphone if this is still a dead spot, or if real-world
    > coverage has materially improved, as it is a key Go/NoGo to
    > potentially changing providers.
    >
    > Suggestions?



    An odd one perhaps. If you have an otherwise compelling reason to ditch
    Verizon, (that shiny new iPhone calling you, perhaps?) you can leverage
    prepaid to get the best of both worlds.

    PagePlus Wireless (http://www.pagepluscellular.com) is a Verizon reseller-
    they offer Verizon's coverage at a significant discount vs. Verizon's
    regular prepaid rates. You can activate any deactivated Verizon phone on
    their service, and they sell refill cards good for 120 days for $10. I use
    them as a backup for my T-Mobile service. T-Mo works in 99% of the places
    I go, but I have issues up in the mountains and ski resorts of Colorado
    where Verizon has excellent coverage, and I REALLY don't want to be without
    a working phone in inclement weather!

    A comparable Verizon service plan would cost me over $80/month more than T-
    Mo charges me (2-phone 1000-minute family plan with unlimited data on two
    WinMo phones costs me $72 on T-Mo- the two data add-ons alone would $90 on
    Verizon, plus $70 for voice.)

    A YEAR of PagePlus costs me $30 for the little I use it, plus a little
    hassle (remembering to buy a $10 card online and refill the account every
    120 days, but that's easily managed in the calendar function of my everyday
    phone.)

    I keep the PP phone and car charger in the glovebox, and it's there if/when
    I need it. It also makes a convenient temporary phone for situations like
    selling something in a classified ad- carry the PP phone around in the back
    pocket for a few days until the item sells, then off and back in the
    glovebox it goes so you don't get another week of "do you still have that
    Toyota?" calls.

    Good luck!





    See More: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?




  2. #2
    -hh
    Guest

    Re: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?

    Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote:
    > -hh wrote:
    >
    > > Hopefully, someone here can recall what I was referring to and suggest
    > > an appropriate research tool.

    >
    > I can't help you as to a site that gives all carriers' info, but I've found
    > the interactive street-level coverage map at T-Mobile to be dead-accurate.
    > AT&T's seems to be a little generous to AT&T, but if their map says no
    > service, you can believe it. If it says "poor" (or whatever the lowest
    > grade is) I'd take it with a gran of salt.


    Thanks. In taking a look at T-Mobile's, it appears to have a lot more
    resolution/gradation than AT&T's. Plus, it also appears that a new
    tower has also been installed right on top of the old 'dead spot'.


    > If you have an otherwise compelling reason to ditch Verizon,
    > (that shiny new iPhone calling you, perhaps?) ...


    I am thinking about AT&T because maybe the "iPhone v2.5" eventually,
    but my main motivation is a GSM carrier because CDMA doesn't work in
    Europe.


    > ... you can leverage prepaid to get the best of both worlds.


    I already have a couple of international prepaid phones laying
    around. They're tolerable for the very occasional trip, but I spent
    2-3 months in Europe just within the past year, which makes them too
    much of a hassle for my tastes. To have a phone with 'unlimited' time
    at short notice and just one phone# where I can be reached at is worth
    the relative expenses IMO (YMMV, naturally).


    -hh



  3. #3
    Todd Allcock
    Guest

    Re: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?

    At 06 Dec 2007 09:55:58 -0800 -hh wrote:

    > I already have a couple of international prepaid phones laying
    > around. They're tolerable for the very occasional trip, but I spent
    > 2-3 months in Europe just within the past year, which makes them too
    > much of a hassle for my tastes. To have a phone with 'unlimited' time
    > at short notice and just one phone# where I can be reached at is worth
    > the relative expenses IMO (YMMV, naturally).


    You can always "cheat" with a VoIP provider that offers forwarding (like
    Skype or Voicestick.) Set your VoIP provider to forward all calls to your
    European prepaid phone, then set your American cellphone to forward to your
    VoIP number.

    It might cost you $3-5/month for the incoming VoIP number, and $0.20/min.
    or so for the VoIP-to-Europhone call, but that's much cheaper than the $1-
    2/minute you'll be bled by roaming charges.

    Where they really "getcha" is local calls in Europe- those might be a few
    cents/min. on the prepaid (and free for incoming) but they're the same
    $1.xx/min. on your roaming American phone.

    Plus, the locals can then reach you on a local cell number, rather than
    having to call 4500 miles back to the US to reach you on the next block!
    ;-)


    For short trips, roaming is economical, since you are spared the expense of
    the prepaid SIM and the VoIP forwarding, but two or three months probably
    justifies a little hassle on your end setting up a system like I described
    that's seamless to your friends family and associates, while potentially
    saving you a bucket of money...





  4. #4
    -hh
    Guest

    Re: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?

    Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > For short trips, roaming is economical, since you are spared the expense of
    > the prepaid SIM and the VoIP forwarding, but two or three months probably
    > justifies a little hassle on your end setting up a system like I described...


    Agreed, although I should have clarified/disclosed better: my "2-3
    months" was the aggregate sum of multiple 'short' trips, so there
    would have been repeated setup/teardown. Plus they weren't all to the
    same country either, which makes buying a prepaid SIM for each country
    a nuisance (and a few had had multiple countries in the same week) and
    on the home front, every time that I'd get home, I'd promptly lose
    another weekend flying down to the Florida panhandle (home of no
    direct flights) for a sick family member. As such, I've probably only
    had around 20-25 weekends at home this calendar year.


    -hh



  5. #5
    Dennis Ferguson
    Guest

    Re: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?

    On 2007-12-07, -hh <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> For short trips, roaming is economical, since you are spared the expense of
    >> the prepaid SIM and the VoIP forwarding, but two or three months probably
    >> justifies a little hassle on your end setting up a system like I described...

    >
    > Agreed, although I should have clarified/disclosed better: my "2-3
    > months" was the aggregate sum of multiple 'short' trips, so there
    > would have been repeated setup/teardown. Plus they weren't all to the
    > same country either, which makes buying a prepaid SIM for each country
    > a nuisance


    I can sympathize with all of this, I also travel a fair bit and
    have had months with some big AT&T cellphone bills. It is the case,
    however, that doing what Tod suggests when it is convenient seems to
    work pretty well. To keep the US number alive I have a VoIP forwarding
    service, but when I can't get to an Internet connection to redirect it
    I'll sometimes just forward the AT&T phone itself to the overseas number;
    AT&T's international long distance rates aren't terrible if you pay the
    monthly fee for World Connect and you can forward GSM phones while
    overseas. I also find the effort to get a local SIM worth it if I'm
    going to be spending more than 3 or 4 days in the country (maybe a
    little longer if I don't speak the language and don't have a local
    friend to help buy it), or if I know I'll be back fairly frequently;
    I now have a small collection of SIM cards for countries I often
    visit, so I can set up the call forwarding just before I leave the US
    and slip the local SIM into the phone when I get there. I also have
    a global roaming SIM with a US number, from CelTrek, which is a lot
    cheaper than AT&T roaming in many countries, though I usually reserve
    this for countries where the price advantage over AT&T roaming is large
    since the CelTrek service, while reliable, has a big, annoying delay.
    If none of this is convenient, however, I just use the AT&T SIM.

    And, actually, AT&T isn't too bad for this if you travel enough to
    justify the extra monthly fees (about $100/year) to get the cheaper
    roaming and long distance rates (if I travelled internationally only
    occasionally I'd use T-Mobile instead). I also have Verizon service
    for use in Mexico, but I'd drop this and just live with AT&T if I
    went to Mexico less frequently. I won't buy an iPhone, however,
    as much as I like the look of it, until you can get them unlocked by
    the carrier to use non-AT&T SIM cards.

    Dennis Ferguson



  6. #6
    SMS 斯蒂文• 夏
    Guest

    Re: Really Detailed Coverage Maps?

    Todd Allcock wrote:

    > For short trips, roaming is economical, since you are spared the expense of
    > the prepaid SIM and the VoIP forwarding, but two or three months probably
    > justifies a little hassle on your end setting up a system like I described
    > that's seamless to your friends family and associates, while potentially
    > saving you a bucket of money...


    I used "http://maxroam.com/" for my wife's last trip to Europe. They
    give you a U.S. number. You can also get local numbers in a bunch of
    countries at an extra charge. It's not terrible cheap, but a lot less
    than doing international roaming on any U.S. carrier.

    "http://celtrek.com/" is similar and less expensive than MaxRoam (but a
    higher start-up cost).

    If you're often going to be at a landline, or if you want to use prepaid
    SIMs for a single country, then setting up a Voicestick account makes
    sense, as you can keep changing the forwarding number to follow you around.

    The other thing you can do is set up a OneSuite account, and give your
    trusted friends and family access to it. You can set up a two digit
    rapid dial entry that you change remotely as you move from country to
    country. At least One Suite doesn't charge a monthly fee like Voicestick.



  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.