Join the Wireless Phone Revolution for $10!

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?



On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:22:05 -0700, O x f o r d
<[email protected]> wrote:
>As the need for pointlessly expensive Cell Contracts continues to
>disappear, FON... the world's largest free wireless network has a deal
>to make your CURRENT broadband connection Secure and "Wireless" for $5
>and $5 for shipping.
>
>The faster we all join together to get rid of the old Cell Industry the
>faster everyone on the planet will move forward!
>
>Go here and choose your country!
>
>https://shop.fon.com/FonShop/shop/
>
>Join Fon here, and they will add you to the list to get the $5 router.
>
>http://www.fon.com/en/register/form
>
>The cool thing about all of this is that you can add it to your existing
>wired OR wireless network, and then it allows you to segment your DSL or
>Cable connection into one called "social", the other is "private to
>you"... you make money every time someone connects, plus gives you the
>freedom to "join" any Fon network worldwide.
>
>It's the perfect mesh matrix to get rid of those ugly cell towers and
>provide you with free world wide calls!
>
>The future is here, join the growing "massive... basically FREE" party!
>
>http://www.fon.com/en/
>
>---

---

› See More: Join the Wireless Phone Revolution for $10!

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:09:19 -0500, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>O x f o r d wrote:
>
>> Join Fon here, and they will add you to the list
>
>
>FON-boi seeks fan-boi for MLM.

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:33:29 -0700, Snit <[email protected]>
wrote:
>"Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> stated in post
>[email protected] on 12/9/07 12:01 PM:
>
>> At 09 Dec 2007 11:34:51 -0700 Snit wrote:
>>
>>> If you split it to much the bandwidth is slowed for others.
>>
>> You forget Rick was arguing with Oxford, who has assured us all in the past
>> any WiFi connection can easily handle 50-100 without any drop in performance.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Does that help you to understand? And please, please, do not claim you
>> were
>>> merely feigning ignorance again.
>>
>> Arguing with Oxford is like arguing relgion- one side has to accept the
>> other's world view as a starting point and back out of it via the
>> inconsistencies found in it...
>
>I am not arguing that Oxford is correct - but Rick often feigns ignorance in
>his debates... it is a silly tactic.
>
>
>--
>I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please
>everyone. -- Bill Cosby
>

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:20:12 -0600, DTC <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Todd Allcock wrote:
>> Arguing with Oxford is like arguing relgion- one side has to accept the
>> other's world view as a starting point and back out of it via the
>> inconsistencies found in it...
>
>Wow...that sounds like the way my mom explained Catholicism to me over
>fifty years ago.
>

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 15:04:15 -0500, Tim Murray <[email protected]>
wrote:
>On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:34:39 -0500, O x f o r d wrote:
>> "Kevin Weaver" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Wow, 34.00 for 2 months. Quick, Call brinks armored truck service.
>>
>> or $204 a year, or about half my DSL bill each year.
>>
>> sweet!
>
>Call two Brinks, then.
>

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:47:32 -0500, News <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>O x f o r d wrote:
>
>
>> you'll understand when you move up to making money off your idle
>> bandwidth.
>>
>
>
>And you'll understand when your ISP cuts you off for TOS violations,
>or the feds show up asking who at your IP was downloading trash.

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:10:37 +0100, Sandman <[email protected]> wrote:
>In article
><[email protected]>,
> Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>[snip oxfords crap]
>
>> There's nothing "free" about it.
>>
>> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
>> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
>> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
>> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
>> FON Spots worldwide!"
>>
>> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
>> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
>> I were willing.
>>
>> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
>> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
>> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
>>
>> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
>> then sharing it "free?"
>>
>> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
>
>It won't have been killed by then?
>
>
>--
>Sandman[.net]

Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?


On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:15:19 -0500, "MuahMan" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
>"Sandman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> In article
>> <[email protected]>,
>> Edwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> [snip oxfords crap]
>>
>>> There's nothing "free" about it.
>>>
>>> "FON is the largest WiFi community in the world. FON is a Community of
>>> people making WiFi universal and free. Our vision is WiFi everywhere
>>> made possible by the members of the Community, Foneros. We share some
>>> of our home Internet connection and get free access to the Community's
>>> FON Spots worldwide!"
>>>
>>> I'm not letting any roaming strangers share my home internet
>>> connection. I'm sure it would violate my terms of service even if
>>> I were willing.
>>>
>>> "Foneros connect to thousands of WiFi FON Spots worldwide for free. If
>>> you still do not share your WiFi, you can purchase inexpensive access.
>>> Find FON Spots on our FON Maps"
>>>
>>> How is purchasing access or paying for my home internet connection and
>>> then sharing it "free?"
>>>
>>> The iPhone is going to 3G next year, BTW.
>>
>> It won't have been killed by then?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sandman[.net]
>
>Killed is different than irrelevant?
>

"[email protected]" <[email protected]> stated in post
[email protected] on 12/9/07 6:37 PM:

>
> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:33:29 -0700, Snit <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> stated in post
>> [email protected] on 12/9/07 12:01 PM:
>>
>>> At 09 Dec 2007 11:34:51 -0700 Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you split it to much the bandwidth is slowed for others.
>>>
>>> You forget Rick was arguing with Oxford, who has assured us all in the past
>>> any WiFi connection can easily handle 50-100 without any drop in
>>> performance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Does that help you to understand? And please, please, do not claim you
>>> were
>>>> merely feigning ignorance again.
>>>
>>> Arguing with Oxford is like arguing relgion- one side has to accept the
>>> other's world view as a starting point and back out of it via the
>>> inconsistencies found in it...
>>
>> I am not arguing that Oxford is correct - but Rick often feigns ignorance in
>> his debates... it is a silly tactic.

I hit reply... I do not know the "native" group of all the folks in the
thread.

If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
service.


--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone (http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:47:58 -0700, Snit <[email protected]>
wrote:
>"[email protected]" <[email protected]> stated in post
>[email protected] on 12/9/07 6:37 PM:
>
>>
>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>

>If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
>service.

???? I'm not the one who needs help. You are. Let me help you not to
ruin serious news groups.

Nokia is a mobile phone brand and has very little to do with your
postings.

At 09 Dec 2007 18:20:12 -0600 DTC wrote:

> Wow...that sounds like the way my mom explained Catholicism to me over
fifty years ago.

As an ex-Catholic, I used to have lots of run-ins with my instructors over
the sillier tennants of the religion. Like the whole cardboard-wafer they
passed out actually becoming the flesh of Jesus when blessed.

I asked why we believe Jesus had the power to walk on water, turn water to
wine and feed a thousand people with a few fish, but we didn't believe he
had the power to speak using a metaphor... ;-)

[email protected] wrote:

> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?

why are you putting your reply at the top?

that also shows you don't know how usenet works.

replies alway go on the bottom of the thread.

"[email protected]" <[email protected]> stated in post
[email protected] on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:

>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
>> service.
>
> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.

If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
conversations when multiple people post with the same name.

<snip />


--
Picture of a tuna milkshake: http://snipurl.com/f34z
Feel free to ask for the recipe.

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:55:29 -0700, Snit <[email protected]>
wrote:
>"[email protected]" <[email protected]> stated in post
>[email protected] on 12/9/07 7:01 PM:
>
>>>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>>
>>> If you need other help with how Usenet works just ask... I am happy to be of
>>> service.
>>
>> ???? I'm not the one who needs help.
>
>If you are not the one who posted the question then the answer was not
>directed at you. If that is the case, though, it makes it hard to follow
>conversations when multiple people post with the same name.
>

You are just confused. I hope you feel better today.

On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:43:35 -0700, Gene Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:
>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> Why are you posting this in a Nokia group?
>
>why are you putting your reply at the top?

To get your attention.

>that also shows you don't know how usenet works.

It worked with you.

>replies alway go on the bottom of the thread.

No, as you can see, it can also be interfoiled.