reply to discussion
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
  1. #16
    Oxford
    Guest

    Re: Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack

    "Ness-Net" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > And.... Oxy, wrong again!!
    >
    > Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
    > John E. Dunn
    >
    > Apr 18, 2010 5:44 am
    >
    > http://www.pcworld.com/article/19446...k.html?tk=nl_d
    > nx_h_crawl
    >
    > Able to infect both PowerPC and newer Intel-based Macs thanks to being
    > written as a universal binary,
    > OSX.HellRTS.D sets out to take complete control of an infected machine,
    > setting
    > itself up as a server capable of doing pretty much what it wants. This will
    > include, downloading software,
    > spewing email, set up screen sharing, accessing files on the Mac, and copying
    > anything it finds on the clipboard.
    >
    > So much for your complete BS....


    you might want to read the article, no macs were "hit", it was just a
    concept. so you were duped by a "headline", but upon reading, it's clear
    no macs were ever touched.

    ness-net just can't win for trying...



    See More: Apple Fans Are Clueless About Security




  2. #17
    Oxford
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    nospam <[email protected]> wrote:

    > > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
    > > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
    > > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.

    >
    > this just gets better with every post.


    thanks!

    and it would be even better to say:

    it's like a thief inviting another thief into his home, but then being
    surprised something was taken.





  3. #18
    nospam
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > > > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
    > > > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
    > > > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.

    > >
    > > this just gets better with every post.

    >
    > thanks!


    clear over your head.

    the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
    allow mischievous behavior.



  4. #19
    Ness-Net
    Guest

    Re: Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack


    "Oxford" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    > "Ness-Net" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> And.... Oxy, wrong again!!
    >>
    >> Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
    >> John E. Dunn
    >>
    >> Apr 18, 2010 5:44 am
    >>
    >> http://www.pcworld.com/article/19446...k.html?tk=nl_d
    >> nx_h_crawl
    >>
    >> Able to infect both PowerPC and newer Intel-based Macs thanks to being
    >> written as a universal binary,
    >> OSX.HellRTS.D sets out to take complete control of an infected machine,
    >> setting
    >> itself up as a server capable of doing pretty much what it wants. This will
    >> include, downloading software,
    >> spewing email, set up screen sharing, accessing files on the Mac, and copying
    >> anything it finds on the clipboard.
    >>
    >> So much for your complete BS....

    >
    > you might want to read the article, no macs were "hit", it was just a
    > concept. so you were duped by a "headline", but upon reading, it's clear
    > no macs were ever touched.
    >
    > ness-net just can't win for trying...


    I'm not in the habit of posting complete fiction - like you are famous for.
    The point you are missing (NO SURPRISE!!) is that you have a regular habit of proclaiming things
    to be undisputable fact - when they are NOT.

    Trolling and delusional rants is all they are.

    Your being completely full of crap was proven recently - and there was a noticeable silence from you.
    Tail between the legs Oxy??








  5. #20
    Oxford
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    nospam <[email protected]> wrote:

    > > > this just gets better with every post.

    > >
    > > thanks!

    >
    > clear over your head.


    nope! i exploited a flaw in your reply



  6. #21
    MuahMan
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    On Apr 17, 7:52*pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
    > great, but the fact remains OSX is by far the most secure OS you can
    > run... nobody can crack it without a password and that's been proven
    > over and over. It can't get viruses, and only 6 worms or trojans have
    > happened in the last decade.
    >
    > windows has hundreds of new viruses each day, only linux ranks up with
    > OSX it terms of security.


    Mac OS X has no viruses because why bother? Oooh lets hack a mac and
    steal the some MP3's and family photos!!!! Or lets hack the Windows
    server that has actual valuable data.



  7. #22
    Nigel Ratburn
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    In article
    <dac16fbd-b957-4d95-888b-bb23594d8bcb@c42g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
    MuahMan <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Oooh, let's hack a Mac and steal the some MP3s and family photos!


    I corrected your grammar for you.

    By the way, did you ever replicate the Windoze key and E key combo to
    crash Vista yet? You could not do it on your Youtube channel.



  8. #23
    Richard B. Gilbert
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    nospam wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>>> no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
    >>>> being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
    >>>> that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
    >>> this just gets better with every post.

    >> thanks!

    >
    > clear over your head.
    >
    > the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
    > allow mischievous behavior.


    Or a sense of humor!
    ;-)



  9. #24
    Alan Baker
    Guest

    Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security

    In article <180420101510204783%[email protected]>,
    nospam <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > > > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
    > > > > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
    > > > > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
    > > >
    > > > this just gets better with every post.

    > >
    > > thanks!

    >
    > clear over your head.
    >
    > the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
    > allow mischievous behavior.


    If you define mischievous behaviour as "allowing software installed at
    the owner's instruction to do what it was designed to do"...

    --
    "The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
    "I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
    "It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
    '[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
    'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
    IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
    'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
    on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)



  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.