reply to discussion |
Results 16 to 24 of 24
- 04-18-2010, 04:01 PM #16OxfordGuest
Re: Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
"Ness-Net" <[email protected]> wrote:
> And.... Oxy, wrong again!!
>
> Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
> John E. Dunn
>
> Apr 18, 2010 5:44 am
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/19446...k.html?tk=nl_d
> nx_h_crawl
>
> Able to infect both PowerPC and newer Intel-based Macs thanks to being
> written as a universal binary,
> OSX.HellRTS.D sets out to take complete control of an infected machine,
> setting
> itself up as a server capable of doing pretty much what it wants. This will
> include, downloading software,
> spewing email, set up screen sharing, accessing files on the Mac, and copying
> anything it finds on the clipboard.
>
> So much for your complete BS....
you might want to read the article, no macs were "hit", it was just a
concept. so you were duped by a "headline", but upon reading, it's clear
no macs were ever touched.
ness-net just can't win for trying...
› See More: Apple Fans Are Clueless About Security
- 04-18-2010, 04:08 PM #17OxfordGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
> > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
> > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
>
> this just gets better with every post.
thanks!
and it would be even better to say:
it's like a thief inviting another thief into his home, but then being
surprised something was taken.
- 04-18-2010, 04:10 PM #18nospamGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
> > > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
> > > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
> >
> > this just gets better with every post.
>
> thanks!
clear over your head.
the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
allow mischievous behavior.
- 04-18-2010, 04:39 PM #19Ness-NetGuest
Re: Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
"Oxford" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Ness-Net" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> And.... Oxy, wrong again!!
>>
>> Macs Hit by Backdoor Attack
>> John E. Dunn
>>
>> Apr 18, 2010 5:44 am
>>
>> http://www.pcworld.com/article/19446...k.html?tk=nl_d
>> nx_h_crawl
>>
>> Able to infect both PowerPC and newer Intel-based Macs thanks to being
>> written as a universal binary,
>> OSX.HellRTS.D sets out to take complete control of an infected machine,
>> setting
>> itself up as a server capable of doing pretty much what it wants. This will
>> include, downloading software,
>> spewing email, set up screen sharing, accessing files on the Mac, and copying
>> anything it finds on the clipboard.
>>
>> So much for your complete BS....
>
> you might want to read the article, no macs were "hit", it was just a
> concept. so you were duped by a "headline", but upon reading, it's clear
> no macs were ever touched.
>
> ness-net just can't win for trying...
I'm not in the habit of posting complete fiction - like you are famous for.
The point you are missing (NO SURPRISE!!) is that you have a regular habit of proclaiming things
to be undisputable fact - when they are NOT.
Trolling and delusional rants is all they are.
Your being completely full of crap was proven recently - and there was a noticeable silence from you.
Tail between the legs Oxy??
- 04-18-2010, 05:19 PM #20OxfordGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > this just gets better with every post.
> >
> > thanks!
>
> clear over your head.
nope! i exploited a flaw in your reply
- 04-18-2010, 05:31 PM #21MuahManGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
On Apr 17, 7:52*pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
> great, but the fact remains OSX is by far the most secure OS you can
> run... nobody can crack it without a password and that's been proven
> over and over. It can't get viruses, and only 6 worms or trojans have
> happened in the last decade.
>
> windows has hundreds of new viruses each day, only linux ranks up with
> OSX it terms of security.
Mac OS X has no viruses because why bother? Oooh lets hack a mac and
steal the some MP3's and family photos!!!! Or lets hack the Windows
server that has actual valuable data.
- 04-18-2010, 07:19 PM #22Nigel RatburnGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
In article
<dac16fbd-b957-4d95-888b-bb23594d8bcb@c42g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
MuahMan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oooh, let's hack a Mac and steal the some MP3s and family photos!
I corrected your grammar for you.
By the way, did you ever replicate the Windoze key and E key combo to
crash Vista yet? You could not do it on your Youtube channel.
- 04-18-2010, 07:55 PM #23Richard B. GilbertGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
nospam wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>> no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
>>>> being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
>>>> that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
>>> this just gets better with every post.
>> thanks!
>
> clear over your head.
>
> the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
> allow mischievous behavior.
Or a sense of humor!
;-)
- 04-18-2010, 08:54 PM #24Alan BakerGuest
Re: Apple Fans Aren't Clueless About Security
In article <180420101510204783%[email protected]>,
nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Oxford
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > no it wasn't, that's like inviting a thief into your home, but then
> > > > being surprised something was taken. but this was a harmless trojan,
> > > > that didn't do anything since osx doesn't allow mischievous behavior.
> > >
> > > this just gets better with every post.
> >
> > thanks!
>
> clear over your head.
>
> the mere fact that os x allows you to use it is proof that it *does*
> allow mischievous behavior.
If you define mischievous behaviour as "allowing software installed at
the owner's instruction to do what it was designed to do"...
--
"The iPhone doesn't have a speaker phone" -- "I checked very carefully" --
"I checked Apple's web pages" -- Edwin on the iPhone
"It is Mac OS X, not BSD.' -- 'From Mac OS to BSD Unix." -- "It's BSD Unix with Apple's APIs and GUI on top of it' -- 'nothing but BSD Unix' (Edwin on Mac OS X)
'[The IBM PC] could boot multiple OS, such as DOS, C/PM, GEM, etc.' --
'I claimed nothing about GEM other than it was available software for the
IBM PC. (Edwin on GEM)
'Solaris is just a marketing rename of Sun OS.' -- 'Sun OS is not included
on the timeline of Solaris because it's a different OS.' (Edwin on Sun)
Similar Threads
- Nokia
- Apple (iPhone)
- Apple (iPhone)
- Nokia
Buy passports,drivers licenses,id cards,birth certificates
in New Member Introductions