Inside the Apple iPad - Photos

Larry <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fastest way to transfer files that doesn't involve a screwdriver.

a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
it's basically free.

---

› See More: Inside the Apple iPad - Photos

On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:30:23 -0600, Oxford wrote:

> Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Fastest way to transfer files that doesn't involve a screwdriver.
>
> a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
> it's basically free.

Basically ?


--
Rick

Rick wrote:

> On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:30:23 -0600, Oxford wrote:
>
>> Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Fastest way to transfer files that doesn't involve a screwdriver.
>>
>> a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
>> it's basically free.
>
> Basically ?
>

Well, *if* a firewire connector would be present. That is a *very* big
"if" on apple machines

OxRetard as usual is talking bull****. He is a typical Mac user from CSMA
--
Linux is for people who want to know why it works.
Mac is for people who don't want to know why it works.
DOS is for people who want to know why it does not work.
Windows is for people who don't want to know why it does not work.

Lewis wrote:

> In message <[email protected]>
> Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Rick wrote:
>
>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:30:23 -0600, Oxford wrote:
>>>
>>>> Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Fastest way to transfer files that doesn't involve a screwdriver.
>>>>
>>>> a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado,
>>>> and it's basically free.
>>>
>>> Basically ?
>>>
>
>> Well, *if* a firewire connector would be present. That is a *very* big
>> "if" on apple machines
>
> Really? Every iMac since the iMac DV in 1998. Ever mini. Every MacPro.
> Every MacBookPro.
>

So the missing FW port on my sons MacBook is just a figment of
imagination, right?
The missing FW port on a *lot* of apple machines (especially the newer
ones) is just on the other side, where I didn't look?

Sorry, guy, you have just proven once again that apple fanboiz are the
worst lying filth imaginable. You cult members living under the RDF can't
tell the truth, it seems
--
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

In article <[email protected]>, Lewis
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > Well, *if* a firewire connector would be present. That is a *very* big
> > "if" on apple machines
>
> Really? Every iMac since the iMac DV in 1998.

imac dv was actually late 1999, and the entry level models didn't have
it. however, all imacs since 2000 had firewire.

> Ever mini. Every MacPro.
> Every MacBookPro.

also, the powerbook g3 (pismo) and every powerbook g4, ibook, powermac
g3, powermac g4, powermac g5, imac g4, imac g5, intel imac.

firewire 800 has been on several models since the mid-2000s or so and
is now standard on all macs with firewire.

the *only* macs that don't have firewire are the macbook air (jan 2008)
and the entry level macbook since late 2009.

nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
>Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The missing FW port on a *lot* of apple machines (especially the newer
> > ones) is just on the other side, where I didn't look?
>
> only 2 models in the last ten years.

And of those two models, the lack of FW only appeared in but one (1)
design update on the MacBook out of the ten (10) that it has undergone
since 2006. This was the one-off 13" unibody MacBook - - which was
available in parallel to the 13" white MacBook, which retained
Firewire.


> > Sorry, guy, you have just proven once again that apple fanboiz are the
> > worst lying filth imaginable. You cult members living under the RDF can't *
> > tell the truth, it seems
>
> actually, you've proven that you are ignorant.


Sorry, but it is worse than that: once again, Peter could have tried
to have done some trivial research before making his accusation, but
clearly chose not to. As such, Peter is what he accuses others to
be: "...the worst lying filth imaginable."

And Peter knows this, which is why he trimmed newsgroups again, so
that his deception wouldn't be broadcast as clearly into his home
Linux group (COLA), plus the other group which had been on this iPad
thread, <alt.cellular.attws>. Since the last clearly has zero to do
with this subthread, it is trimmed in the follow-ups.

-hh

In article <[email protected]>,
Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rick wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 15 May 2010 20:30:23 -0600, Oxford wrote:
> >
> >> Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Fastest way to transfer files that doesn't involve a screwdriver.
> >>
> >> a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
> >> it's basically free.
> >
> > Basically ?
> >
>
> Well, *if* a firewire connector would be present. That is a *very* big
> "if" on apple machines
>
> OxRetard as usual is talking bull****. He is a typical Mac user from CSMA

Only the MacBook (non-pro) and MacBook Air don't have firewire, the
mini, imac, MacBook Pro and tower all have firewire, so I guess IF isn't
a good description.

--
Lloyd

Rick <[email protected]> wrote:

> > a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
> > it's basically free.
>
> Basically ?

yes, most mac users already have a firewire cable, superduper is free
for backups.

Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, *if* a firewire connector would be present. That is a *very* big
> "if" on apple machines

99% of Macs in use have firewire, so thanks for the laugh peter...

Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> So the missing FW port on my sons MacBook is just a figment of
> imagination, right?
> The missing FW port on a *lot* of apple machines (especially the newer
> ones) is just on the other side, where I didn't look?

no, it's less than 5% of new machines, and far less than 1% of all
machines... so please learn to post facts before you post to usenet.

Oxford wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> So the missing FW port on my sons MacBook is just a figment of
>> imagination, right?
>> The missing FW port on a *lot* of apple machines (especially the newer
>> ones) is just on the other side, where I didn't look?
>
> no, it's less than 5% of new machines, and far less than 1% of all
> machines... so please learn to post facts before you post to usenet.

These numbers, coming from you, have to be at least multiplied by ten.
*Because* they are coming from you. You are the worst liar on all of
usenet after Snit Michael Glasser.
--
Klingon function calls do not have 'parameters' -
they have 'arguments' - and they ALWAYS WIN THEM.

Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> > no, it's less than 5% of new machines, and far less than 1% of all
> > machines... so please learn to post facts before you post to usenet.
>
> These numbers, coming from you, have to be at least multiplied by ten.
> *Because* they are coming from you. You are the worst liar on all of
> usenet after Snit Michael Glasser.

peter is bad at math, and still can't figure out how to set his usenet
follow-ups correctly. lunix's village idiot makes us laugh again.

if you multiplied my numbers by 10, that would mean 50% of all new Macs
do NOT have firewire, which is ABSURD... and 10% of all macs since 2000
did NOT have firewire, which is ludicrous.

sorry peter, you lose again.

Oxford stated in post
[email protected] on 5/16/10 5:14
PM:

> Peter Köhlmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> no, it's less than 5% of new machines, and far less than 1% of all
>>> machines... so please learn to post facts before you post to usenet.
>>
>> These numbers, coming from you, have to be at least multiplied by ten.
>> *Because* they are coming from you. You are the worst liar on all of
>> usenet after Snit Michael Glasser.
>
> peter is bad at math, and still can't figure out how to set his usenet
> follow-ups correctly. lunix's village idiot makes us laugh again.
>
> if you multiplied my numbers by 10, that would mean 50% of all new Macs
> do NOT have firewire, which is ABSURD... and 10% of all macs since 2000
> did NOT have firewire, which is ludicrous.
>
> sorry peter, you lose again.

Peter is simply displaying is low self esteem. It is *the* reason he
belittles everyone else...


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

On 2010-05-15, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> nospam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > yes, starting with iTunes 9, you can now sync via wireless.
>>
>> then why don't you explain how you sync an ipod or iphone wirelessly.
>>
>> put up or shut up.
>
> but that wasn't the question... todd said you couldn't wirelessly sync
> itunes and i proved that was incorrect... yes, the smaller devices

....I think that if you tried to pull that bit of dissembling at the Apple
store that at least the customers would think you are full of **** even if
the sales drones do not.

[deletia]

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \

On 2010-05-16, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Rick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > a firewire cable and superduper is 4-6 times faster than a Tornado, and
>> > it's basically free.
>>
>> Basically ?
>
> yes, most mac users already have a firewire cable, superduper is free
> for backups.

Why would they already have a firewire cable? They don't get included
for free. Most devices that would be prone to use the firewire interface
have been displaced by USB devices instead.

They are even dropping firewire from some new Macs.

There are probably a lot of Mac users that have no clue what firewire is.

--
OpenDoc is moot when Apple is your one stop iShop. |||
/ | \