Are other EMF radiators more dangerous than cellphones?

This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna..._b_618875.html

Sure glad I'm breathing used veggie oil fumes from my 1983 Mercedes diesel
with no EMF...ZERO.



--
Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...

Larry

---

› See More: Are other EMF radiators more dangerous than cellphones?

In message <[email protected]> Larry
<[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:

>This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna..._b_618875.html

Not really all that interesting. The author observes "something in this
car bothers me", then moves to "this meter goes up" and immediately
jumps to causation without any further understanding.

It's possible that EM field really do bother her for some reason, but
since it's likely not the strongest EM field she's been exposed to (just
the highest that crossed her awareness) it seems silly to jump directly
to blaming the EM fields.

I'd love to see her get tested in double-blind laboratory tests to see
if she really does react negatively.

In message <[email protected]>
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> DevilsPGD <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In message <[email protected]> Larry
>> <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:
>>
>> >This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
>> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna..._b_618875.html
>>
>> Not really all that interesting. The author observes "something in this
>> car bothers me", then moves to "this meter goes up" and immediately
>> jumps to causation without any further understanding.
>>
>> It's possible that EM field really do bother her for some reason, but
>> since it's likely not the strongest EM field she's been exposed to (just
>> the highest that crossed her awareness) it seems silly to jump directly
>> to blaming the EM fields.
>>
>> I'd love to see her get tested in double-blind laboratory tests to see
>> if she really does react negatively.
>
>It's interesting that she says that the Prius's radio, nav system, and
>other auxiliary electrically-powered items make the meter go up--but
>that the same electrically-powered aux systems on the other cars don't.

The biggest problem with her idea (I won't even justify it with the word
"theory" at this point) is that it's not the battery that creates an EM
field at all, it's the electrical side of the engine.

Now maybe what she's seeing is the batteries' electrical reserves are
depleted and the gas engine is spinning the electrical engine to power
the auxiliary electrical items, but even so this would be nothing
compared to the fields the Prius cars (lower end and her model) generate
while in motion.

More importantly, it's still nothing near the fields you can encounter
in your daily life that go entirely unnoticed.

"Larry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna..._b_618875.html
>
> Sure glad I'm breathing used veggie oil fumes from my 1983 Mercedes diesel
> with no EMF...ZERO.
>
>
>
> --
> Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...
>
> Larry

Uh er.....how about standing in front of ship's navigation radar or fire
control radar. Now that is serious emf.

On Jun 28, 1:16*pm, "John B. Coarsey, PE" <jcoarsey<nospam>@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> "Larry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna..._b_618875.html
>
> > Sure glad I'm breathing used veggie oil fumes from my 1983 Mercedes diesel
> > with no EMF...ZERO.
>
> > --
> > Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...
>
> > Larry
>
> Uh er.....how about standing in front of ship's navigation radar or fire
> control radar. Now that is serious emf.

15 minutes in the sun?

In message
<04e4f1c4-797b-4715-8d25-2d487570c268@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:

>15 minutes in the sun?

Stupid sun. We really should do something about it.

"John B. Coarsey, PE" <jcoarsey<nospam>@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> "Larry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> This was on the Huffington Post today.....most interesting:
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alanna...pe_b_618875.ht
>> ml
>>
>> Sure glad I'm breathing used veggie oil fumes from my 1983 Mercedes
>> diesel with no EMF...ZERO.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Creationism is to science what storks are to obstetrics...
>>
>> Larry
>
> Uh er.....how about standing in front of ship's navigation radar or
> fire control radar. Now that is serious emf.
>
>
>

The air search runs more power. Look for AN/SPS-55. Serious RF power
comes in great packages.



--
Global Warming and Creationism are to science what storks are to
obstetrics...

Larry

DevilsPGD <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

> In message
> <04e4f1c4-797b-4715-8d25-2d487570c268@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> was claimed to have wrote:
>
>>15 minutes in the sun?
>
> Stupid sun. We really should do something about it.
>

We could just block it out. The AGW alarmists tell us its the CO2 from
your Volkswagen Jetta that's warming up the planet. We no longer need the
sun to warm it.



--
Global Warming and Creationism are to science what storks are to
obstetrics...

Larry