reply to discussion
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 66
  1. #46
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > Multi-boot Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows XP Professional, Linux.


    Good choice.

    > >Me, I like the operating
    > >systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone so

    that
    > >throws out the cheap version of XP, the cheap version of Vista and the

    cheap
    > >version of Windows 7.

    >
    > VNC works on all of them.
    > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing>


    Are you telling me you can access your computer from your phone if all you
    have is VNC on your computer?

    I certainly didn't see anything about that on the URL you listed above.
    Plus I have tried to get TSWeb to work from my mobile phone and it failed so
    I don't expect VNC to work either.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...08(WS.10).aspx





    See More: NEWS: Apple iPhone 4 available today amid early reports of hardware issues




  2. #47
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "Roger 2008" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > Multi-boot Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows XP Professional, Linux.

    >
    > Good choice.
    >
    > > >Me, I like the operating
    > > >systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone so

    > that
    > > >throws out the cheap version of XP, the cheap version of Vista and the

    > cheap
    > > >version of Windows 7.

    > >
    > > VNC works on all of them.
    > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing>

    >
    > Are you telling me you can access your computer from your phone if all you
    > have is VNC on your computer?
    >
    > I certainly didn't see anything about that on the URL you listed above.
    > Plus I have tried to get TSWeb to work from my mobile phone and it failed

    so
    > I don't expect VNC to work either.
    > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...08(WS.10).aspx


    I just did a search for "VNC WM6" and found out you need a viewer.

    I don't need anything special at all for Remote Desktop Mobile to work and
    if you are controlling XP Pro or later then you even get the sound
    transferred to your phone.





  3. #48
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > WinMo remote desktop app, and works with more
    > versions of Windows (e.g. XP Home.) They offer paid and free versions of
    > their service. The free version does remote desktop, but doesn't redirect
    > the PC audio, and doesn't let you copy/paste files between the connected
    > machines.


    yuck. "doesn't redirect the PC audio." That is one of the neatest things
    about Remote Desktop for mobile besides the full screen mode and how easy it
    is to transfer files back and forth.





  4. #49
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote in news:ea72o.1$EJ7.0
    @hurricane:

    > True- both those are in the "Pro" paid service. I just have a heck of a
    > time remoting in via cellular from some reason. (RDM works great at home
    > on my own network via WiFi where I don't need it to!)
    >
    >


    Todd, have you tried switching from the standard VNC ports to some oddball
    port the sellphone carriers don't have throttled to prevent the service?

    Remote desktop even runs faster on non standard ports through free wifi
    because of the port throttling going on to lower bandwidth usage.


    --
    iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

    Larry




  5. #50
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:29:46 -0600, in
    <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >>
    >> Multi-boot Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows XP Professional, Linux.

    >
    >Good choice.
    >
    >> >Me, I like the operating
    >> >systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone so

    >that
    >> >throws out the cheap version of XP, the cheap version of Vista and the

    >cheap
    >> >version of Windows 7.

    >>
    >> VNC works on all of them.
    >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing>

    >
    >Are you telling me you can access your computer from your phone if all you
    >have is VNC on your computer?
    >
    >I certainly didn't see anything about that on the URL you listed above.
    >Plus I have tried to get TSWeb to work from my mobile phone and it failed so
    >I don't expect VNC to work either.
    >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...08(WS.10).aspx



    I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my mobile. Works quite nicely.

    --
    John

    "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
    [Wethern’s Law of Suspended Judgement]



  6. #51
    alexd
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    Meanwhile, at the alt.internet.wireless Job Justification Hearings, Todd
    Allcock chose the tried and tested strategy of:

    > dropping mobile support altogether! Thanks, MS!)


    Quite a nice summary of MS's mobile strategy.

    --
    <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) ([email protected])
    21:04:51 up 5 days, 11:35, 4 users, load average: 0.04, 0.34, 0.33
    Qua illic est accuso, illic est a vindicatum



  7. #52
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:29:46 -0600, in
    > <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >news:[email protected]...
    > >>
    > >> Multi-boot Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows XP Professional, Linux.

    > >
    > >Good choice.
    > >
    > >> >Me, I like the operating
    > >> >systems where I can easily enable remote access to use with my phone

    so
    > >that
    > >> >throws out the cheap version of XP, the cheap version of Vista and the

    > >cheap
    > >> >version of Windows 7.
    > >>
    > >> VNC works on all of them.
    > >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing>

    > >
    > >Are you telling me you can access your computer from your phone if all

    you
    > >have is VNC on your computer?
    > >
    > >I certainly didn't see anything about that on the URL you listed above.
    > >Plus I have tried to get TSWeb to work from my mobile phone and it failed

    so
    > >I don't expect VNC to work either.
    > >http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...08(WS.10).aspx

    >
    >
    > I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my mobile. Works quite nicely.


    I used TSWeb on a netbook tethered to my mobile and it worked quite nicely
    but I like things I use from my phone itself without having to tether
    anything to it.

    But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to
    work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work
    with one specific Host Header Name.





  8. #53
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in
    <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to
    >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work
    >with one specific Host Header Name.


    Not sure what you mean by that?

    --
    John

    "We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo



  9. #54
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in
    <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in
    >> <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    >> <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to
    >> >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to work
    >> >with one specific Host Header Name.

    >>
    >> Not sure what you mean by that?

    >
    >TSWeb is a part of IIS so the following might help explain what a Host
    >Header Name is:
    >
    >"How To Use Host Header Names to Configure Multiple Web Sites in Internet
    >Information Services 5.0"
    >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163


    I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit
    usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're
    trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and
    since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote
    desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the
    goalposts it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but
    I'm still not clear what it is.

    --
    John

    "Assumption is the mother of all screw ups."
    [Wethern’s Law of Suspended Judgement]



  10. #55
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:38:42 -0600, in
    > <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >But talking about VNC. I have a question for you. Can you setup VNC to
    > >work with a one specific Host Header Name? BTW you can setup TSWeb to

    work
    > >with one specific Host Header Name.

    >
    > Not sure what you mean by that?


    TSWeb is a part of IIS so the following might help explain what a Host
    Header Name is:

    "How To Use Host Header Names to Configure Multiple Web Sites in Internet
    Information Services 5.0"
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308163

    Since you have XP Pro then you have everything you need right now to test
    out TSWeb. I even know someone that can help you setup TSWeb. :-)

    Years ago when I messed with VNC all you had to do to get to the
    name/password prompt was use an IP address with a port number. If it is
    still like that then I'm still not interested in it.

    BTW can we drop alt.cellular.cingular and alt.internet.wireless from this
    thread? TIA





  11. #56
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:30:23 -0600, in
    <[email protected]>, "Roger 2008"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in
    >>
    >> I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit
    >> usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're
    >> trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and
    >> since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote
    >> desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the
    >> goalposts it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but
    >> I'm still not clear what it is.

    >
    >Here is my quote:
    >"I like the operating systems where I can easily enable remote access to use
    >with my phone"
    >
    >Then you started posting about VNC and I couldn't see how I could use VNC
    >with "my phone" so I searched the internet and found I'd need a VNC viewer.
    >
    >Then you posted something about:"I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my
    >mobile." Then I decided if you were going to talk about tethered to your
    >mobile I'd mention how well TSWeb works when you tether a netbook to your
    >mobile.
    >
    >Then while you were posting about VNC I decided to find out if anything
    >changed in VNC since I messed with it years ago. Looks like TSWeb still has
    >VNC beat in certain areas.
    >
    >----------------------------
    >
    >BTW since TSWeb is a web interface for Remote Desktop you can read more
    >about TSWeb vs VNC at:
    >
    >VNC vs. pcAnywhere vs. Remote Desktop
    >http://www.devhood.com/messages/mess...hread_id=16008
    >


    Still not clear. Must be dense. Sorry.

    --
    John

    "We have met the enemy and he is us" -Pogo



  12. #57
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch

    Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote in news:4Va2o.27152
    [email protected]:

    > At 23 Jul 2010 03:18:45 +0000 Larry wrote:
    >> Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote in news:ea72o.1$EJ7.0
    >> @hurricane:
    >>
    >> > True- both those are in the "Pro" paid service. I just have a heck

    > of a
    >> > time remoting in via cellular from some reason. (RDM works great

    at
    > home
    >> > on my own network via WiFi where I don't need it to!)
    >> >
    >> >

    >>
    >> Todd, have you tried switching from the standard VNC ports to some

    > oddball
    >> port the sellphone carriers don't have throttled to prevent the

    service?
    >
    > No- but my cell service has all ports open AFAIK. T-Mo stopped port
    > blocking a few years ago. I can't get in from open WiFi either- only

    my
    > own network.
    >
    > I've opened the port on my router's firewall (I think- this POS
    > "Actiontec" combo DSL modem/WiFi router Qwest issues has nasty

    counter-
    > intuitive software. Several content servers that worked fine on my

    last
    > router don't work consistently with this one. I've only had this

    thing a
    > month, so I haven't had time to mess with it much.)
    >
    >> Remote desktop even runs faster on non standard ports through free

    wifi
    >> because of the port throttling going on to lower bandwidth usage.

    >
    > Part of my problem, probably, is the WinMo RD clent. There's no

    option
    > to change ports, and I'm not actually sure it resolves names, though

    it's
    > supposed to. Entering the computer's name when on network doesn't

    work,
    > but entering it's IP address does. To connect remotely I enter the

    web
    > address issued by my dynamic DNS redirector service- maybe I need to
    > enter the numeric address directly.
    >
    >


    It would be interesting to plug a PC running a port logger directly into
    the main port of the DSL modem, then attack it with a port scanner from
    some IP OFF the DSL company's system to see how many ports you could
    actually call and/or ping from the attack computer. If you never saw a
    connection attempt on port XXXX, you'd have evidence of port blocking
    many of them are doing.



    --
    iPhone 4 is to cellular technology what the Titanic is to cruise ships.

    Larry




  13. #58
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:22:50 -0600, in
    >
    > I know about hosting multiple websites on a single IP address (albeit
    > usually with Apache not [ugh] IIS), but still don't know what you're
    > trying to do. All you asked for originally was "remote access", and
    > since we were discussing PCs, not servers, I took that to mean remote
    > desktop, which is what VNC does. Now ( assuming you're not moving the
    > goalposts it sounds like you have a much different requirement, but
    > I'm still not clear what it is.


    Here is my quote:
    "I like the operating systems where I can easily enable remote access to use
    with my phone"

    Then you started posting about VNC and I couldn't see how I could use VNC
    with "my phone" so I searched the internet and found I'd need a VNC viewer.

    Then you posted something about:"I use VNC on a netbook tethered to my
    mobile." Then I decided if you were going to talk about tethered to your
    mobile I'd mention how well TSWeb works when you tether a netbook to your
    mobile.

    Then while you were posting about VNC I decided to find out if anything
    changed in VNC since I messed with it years ago. Looks like TSWeb still has
    VNC beat in certain areas.

    ----------------------------

    BTW since TSWeb is a web interface for Remote Desktop you can read more
    about TSWeb vs VNC at:

    VNC vs. pcAnywhere vs. Remote Desktop
    http://www.devhood.com/messages/mess...hread_id=16008





  14. #59
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "Larry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Todd Allcock <[email protected]> wrote in news:4Va2o.27152
    > [email protected]:
    >
    > It would be interesting to plug a PC running a port logger directly into
    > the main port of the DSL modem, then attack it with a port scanner from
    > some IP OFF the DSL company's system to see how many ports you could
    > actually call and/or ping from the attack computer. If you never saw a
    > connection attempt on port XXXX, you'd have evidence of port blocking
    > many of them are doing.


    Now that you mention a "port scanner" here is a good one that will work on
    Todd's Sony Ericsson
    http://www.cam.com/vxutil_pers.html

    All it does is list the open ports and it is easy enough to setup IIS to
    open any port or ports that you want to test.





  15. #60
    Roger 2008
    Guest

    Re: painful to watch


    "Todd Allcock" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > At 23 Jul 2010 22:59:47 -0600 Roger 2008 wrote:
    >
    > Sadly, the vxUtil port scanner hangs on my X1 when using it via cellular.


    I just tried vxUtil on my X1 and remembered that it is very slow on cellular
    so I just scan one or two ports at a time.

    vxUtil helped me find a problem a long time ago when I was trying to get
    vxWeb to work on port 80 so I hadn't used it for a while myself. Plus, you
    don't need an IP address to scan ports as you probably found out.

    > Having said that, for overall useability, it really pales next to
    > LogMeIn. With LMI I can zoom in and out and resize the desktop display.
    > (And it doesn't rearrainge all of desktop icons!) I can really only
    > imagine using RDM if I need PC audio to play over the mobile.


    RDM certainly isn't for everything so I use pcAnywhere for mobile when I
    want to connect to a computer with a lot of desktop icons and don't care
    about the missing sound. pcAnywhere for mobile will not let you zoom in but
    it will let you zoom out to see a screen much bigger than the screen on your
    phone and pcAnywhere for mobile works with XP Home.

    > Maybe I'm missing something, but when I remote in to my PC with RDM, the
    > PC desktop switches to 800x480 to match the phone's screen size. (The
    > display change is what moves the desktop icons around.)


    But RDM looks just like a desktop computer when you go to full screen in
    landscape mode and I like that part of it the most. My biggest complaint
    about RDM is stereo sound is reduced to mono.





  • Similar Threads







  • Quick Reply Quick Reply

    If you are already a member, please login above.