How Apple Sees the World

A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.

Worth watching...

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium

oxford

---

› See More: How Apple Sees the World

On Apr 19, 4:22*pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.
>
> Worth watching...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>
> oxford

You mean Corning? The Ceramics and Glass juggernaut? LOL

Stupid video anyway. Yay! I can get emails on my mirror while taking a
****. Terrific.

On Apr 19, 4:22*pm, Oxford <[email protected]> wrote:
> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.
>
> Worth watching...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>
> oxford

"How Corning sees the World"

Fixed, YW.

On 4/19/2011 4:24 PM, MuahMan wrote:
> On Apr 19, 4:22 pm, Oxford<[email protected]> wrote:
>> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.
>>
>> Worth watching...
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>>
>> oxford
>
> You mean Corning? The Ceramics and Glass juggernaut? LOL
>
> Stupid video anyway. Yay! I can get emails on my mirror while taking a
> ****. Terrific.


Product of the future: WINDEX -- for those smeary surfaces

Oxford brought next idea :
> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.
>
> Worth watching...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>
> oxford

Besides being long and boring - most of that stuff looked more like a
microsoft surface demo tehan anything i've seen from apple

--
Tom Shelton

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:01:38 -0600, Tom Shelton wrote:

> Oxford brought next idea :
>> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.
>>
>> Worth watching...
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>>
>> oxford
>
> Besides being long and boring - most of that stuff looked more like a
> microsoft surface demo tehan anything i've seen from apple

That was a sleeper for sure.


--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...m_is_dead.html

Oxford wrote:

> A rather excellent video of our Apple based future.


But appil don't make Linux and so appil has no future!!


> Worth watching...


I suppose appil could make a Linux distro to spite micoshaft
and kill micoshaft early.


> http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...eZ38&vq=medium
>
> oxford



You should understand Appil is only fit for wimmin.


Linux markets its cheaper products while appil trolls
who promote products to milk wimmin out of money with
their money milking debt creating iPiddys, and MP3 players such as ipod
will happily side with appil and their milking maidens targeting wimmin to
milk wimmin dry and putting them into debt.

Most wimmin I know that has an ipone or ipidyy of any sort are also
seriously deluded and seriously in debt. I bet appil doesn't care.


Who pays you to troll any way?


Are you an employee of ntrepid corporation?
http://www.ntrepidcorp.com/



The line managers who contracted you were sniggering to the bone
when they when they realized what kind of idiot you were
and how useful it would be to them.

They never had so much fun since hosting a tampon party.



And tell me again:

Why do dishonest Amrikaaan companies like Appil and Micoshaft pay Amrikaans
to troll and post ad-hominem personal attacks on the internet?

Has anyone in these companies got a degree in honesty?
If so prove it.

If not, are you expecting to ride on the back of good faith of the
international community to not criticise amrikaas dumbest criminals posting
trolls and ad-hominen personal attacks funded by amrikkkaan companies
like micoshaft and appil? Are they above the law? I don't think so. Its
time for prosecutors to move in and arrest a few of the criminals funding
asstroturfers hiding behind dishonest corporations like appil and micoshaft
who sponsor ad hominem personal attacks and abuse in the internet
in blantant disregard for law.

A few wikileaks to open up scrutiny of the funding routes and who's who in
the chain of command could be a starting point.

Stories like this
http://www.11alive.com/news/local/st...storyid=173964
set a precedent which means every asstroturfer is due for a minimum
$400,000 fine.





Asstroturfer offerings
----------------------


I've just read the contents of the fbo.gov solicitation RTB220610

The US government wants asstroturfers and with it sophisticated
asstroturfing technology to drown out democratic free speech,
and then hide from those whom it seeks to victimize.

It was point no.3 that caught my eye:
0003- Static IP Address Management

What that means is the same as what I've been saying for a while about
doofi, flatcake and clog are true.

They are not individuals but a whole asstroturfing team
behind each sock puppet.

There isn't enough memory between the sock operators to know
or remember what had been said earlier so you know the
conversations are being typed out by multiple individuals
impersonating each other.
It was notable gaffs by the goofy doofy sock that first gave it away.

The asstrotufing teams had already gone into government and offered them
consulting services about what technology and asstroturfing
practices were out there for fbo.gov to decide what they will
purchase in solicitation RTB220610.


:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D



https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportun...=core&_cview=1

Solicitation Number: RTB220610
Notice Type: Sources Sought
Synopsis: Added: 2010-06-22 13:42:52Jun 22, 2010 1:42 pm
Modified: 2010-06-22 14:07:11Jun 22, 2010 2:07 pmTrack Changes

0001- Online Persona Management Service.

50 User Licenses, 10 Personas per user. Software will
allow 10 personas per user, replete with background,
history, supporting details, and cyber presences
that are technically, culturally and geographacilly
consistent. Individual applications will enable an
operator to exercise a number of different online
persons from the same workstation and without fear
of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries.
Personas must be able to appear to originate in
nearly any part of the world and can interact through
conventional online services and social media platforms.
The service includes a user friendly application
environment to maximize the user's situational
awareness by displaying real-time local information.


0002- Secure Virtual Private Network (VPN).

1 each VPN provides the ability for users to
daily and automatically obtain
randomly selected IP addresses through
which they can access the internet. The daily
rotation of the user s IP address prevents compromise
during observation of likely or targeted web sites
or services, while hiding the existence of the
operation. In addition, may provide traffic mixing,
blending the user s traffic with traffic from multitudes
of users from outside the organization. This traffic
blending provides excellent cover and powerful deniability.
Anonymizer Enterprise Chameleon or equal


0003- Static IP Address Management.


:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D


50 each Licence protects the identity of government
agencies and enterprise organizations. Enables organizations
to manage their persistent online personas by assigning
static IP addresses to each persona. Individuals
can perform static impersonations, which allow
them to look like the same person over time. Also allows
organizations that frequent same site/service often to
easily switch IP addresses to look like ordinary
users as opposed to one organization.
Anonymizer IP Mapper License or equal

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :- D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D


0004- Virtual Private Servers,

CONUS. 1 each Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of
presence locations that are setup for each customer
based on the geographic area of operations the
customer is operating within and which allow a
customer?s online persona(s) to appear to originate
from. Ability to provide virtual private servers that
are procured using commercial hosting centers around
the world and which are established anonymously. Once
procured, the geosite is incorporated into the network
and integrated within the customers environment and
ready for use by the customer. Unless specifically
designated as shared, locations are dedicated for use
by each customer and never shared among other customers.
Anonymizer Annual Dedicated CONUS Light Geosite or equal


0005- Virtual Private Servers, OCONUS.

8 Each Provides CONUS or OCONUS points of presence
locations that are setup for each customer based on
the geographic area of operations the customer is
operating within and which allow a customer?s
online persona(s) to appear to
originate from. Ability to provide virtual private
servers that are procured using commercial hosting
centers around the world and which are established
anonymously. Once procured, the geosite is incorporated
into the network and integrated within the customers
environment and ready for use by the customer. Unless
specifically designated as shared, locations are dedicated
for use by each customer and never shared among other
customers. Anonymizer Annual Dedicated OCONUS Light
Geosite or equal


0006- Remote Access Secure Virtual Private Network.

1 each Secure Operating Environment provides a reliable
and protected computing environment from which to stage
and conduct operations. Every session uses a clean
Virtual Machine (VM) image. The solution is accessed
through sets of Virtual Private Network (VPN) devices
located at each Customer facility. The fully-managed
VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) is an environment
that allows users remote access from their desktop into
a VM. Upon session termination, the VM is deleted and
any virus, worm, or malicious software that the user
inadvertently downloaded is destroyed. Anonymizer
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Solution or equal.


Contracting Office Address:
2606 Brown Pelican Ave.
MacDill AFB, Florida 33621-5000
United States

Place of Performance:
Performance will be at MacDIll AFB, Kabul, Afghanistan and Baghdad, Iraq.
MacDill AFB , Florida 33679
United States

Primary Point of Contact.:
Russell Beasley,
Contracting Officer
[email protected]
Phone: (813) 828-4729
Fax: (813) 828-5111

7 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Linux markets its cheaper products

but why market to the cheap end of the market when you can have the best?

it sounds like you despise quality in your life... only want everyone to
be poor and "wanting"...

Tom Shelton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Besides being long and boring - most of that stuff looked more like a
> microsoft surface demo tehan anything i've seen from apple

there was a bit of "surface" mixed in, but it was 90% of what Apple has
envisioned. apple had touch walls back in the 80's don't forget.

i agree some of the fashion stuff was long and boring, but this is how
our Apple based world will look like 30 years out is the point.

flatfish+++ <[email protected]> wrote:

> That was a sleeper for sure.

which clearly means it went way over your understanding of what Apple is
doing...

On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:58:26 -0600, Oxford wrote:

> flatfish+++ <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That was a sleeper for sure.
>
> which clearly means it went way over your understanding of what Apple is
> doing...

In that particular case, Apple was boring me to tears......

--
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscente...m_is_dead.html

flatfish+++ <[email protected]> wrote:

> > which clearly means it went way over your understanding of what Apple is
> > doing...
>
> In that particular case, Apple was boring me to tears......

which means you aren't a sophisticated user. you like nerdy bits and
bytes, you don't yet understand that a computer should be completely
invisible to the user.

you're a "grease monkey", not a driver in other words.

Oxford formulated on Tuesday :
> Tom Shelton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Besides being long and boring - most of that stuff looked more like a
>> microsoft surface demo tehan anything i've seen from apple
>
> there was a bit of "surface" mixed in, but it was 90% of what Apple has
> envisioned.

more than a little. Almost all of that stuff was surface stuff - down
to the styling of the controls.

>apple had touch walls back in the 80's don't forget.
>

You have a reference for that? A far as I can tell, apple got is
multi-touch tech from aquiring Fingerwoks in 2005. MS already had been
working on surface for 4 years by then - that project began in 2001.
So, as far as I can tell MS had been working with multi-touch for quite
sometime before apple ever got into it. Not to mention plain old touch
screens.

> i agree some of the fashion stuff was long and boring, but this is how
> our Apple based world will look like 30 years out is the point.

LOL... I get it. Your one of those mac guys. That's cool.

--
Tom Shelton

On 20/04/2011 05:47, Tom Shelton wrote:

> Oxford formulated on Tuesday :

>> i agree some of the fashion stuff was long and boring, but this is how
>> our Apple based world will look like 30 years out is the point.

> LOL... I get it. Your one of those mac guys. That's cool.

He/she is a troll, and a very thinly disguised one at that.

On 20/04/2011 05:12, Oxford wrote:

> flatfish+++<[email protected]> wrote:
>> In that particular case, Apple was boring me to tears......

> which means you aren't a sophisticated user. you like nerdy bits and
> bytes, you don't yet understand that a computer should be completely
> invisible to the user.

Flatfish is a Wintroll, which places him several leagues beneath a
garden variety troll like you. If you want to see the kind of world
that his ilk envisages, a documentary on living with the Stasi behind
the Iron Curtain would be a good place to begin.