Stephenson, the foul mouthed liar

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> > You're a mind reader now too? You know for a fact that folks ignore your
> > insults? Then why post them??
>
> You know, I guess I really don't care if they ignore them or not. The fact
> is that you openly lie, play both sides of an argument and use deception to
> bolster your argument.
>
> A brief list:
>
> Your lies:


> Sprint offers the fewest phones of the top ten providers

I said top 6 carriers. And that is still true.

> AT&T was not capable of offering 7pm nights

At the time I said it, it was true, I was repeating what folks
in Bothell, Washington had told me.


> AT&T would not match web prices at retail stores

I said they didn't always, and they still dont always. That is still
true, they do sometimes even though the web says their deals are
Exclusive.

> Cingular paid over $50B for AT&TW

If you include the debt they are absorbing, and the likely loses on
asset sales, it totals $50 Billion. How much did Cingular just lose
with its fire sale of South American assests?

> Sprint PCS would be out of business by the end of the year

I said SprintPCS as we know it wont be around, and they wont.
The stock is disappearing, being merged with FON stock, to hid the loses.

> Sprint has no team handling Retention

I said their is no Retention Group anymore, and there isn't! Its a
Cancellation Group that handles retention. I have posted a retention FAQ
however. Perhaps its time to post it again.

There: not one of the lies you ascribe to me is correct.

I also said:

SprintPCS has repeatedly been rated worst in Customer Service.

SprintPCS has secret warranties - i.e. on Sanyo 4500, and Samsung Black
8500; and for screens on only 4 phone models.

So who is the liar now, and who blindly accepts every single corporate
press release?

---

› See More: Stephenson, the foul mouthed liar

> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> lame attempts to coverup his mistakes.

Why foul mouthed. 22 postings on Usenet with the "F" word. 49 postings
with the "S" word. Not to mention other gratuitoous insults for anyone
that would disagree with him, let alone prove him wrong, like AT&T
Wireless lying on its web pages.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > You're a mind reader now too? You know for a fact that folks ignore
your
> > > insults? Then why post them??
> >
> > You know, I guess I really don't care if they ignore them or not. The
fact
> > is that you openly lie, play both sides of an argument and use deception
to
> > bolster your argument.
> >
> > A brief list:
> >
> > Your lies:
>
>
> > Sprint offers the fewest phones of the top ten providers
>
> I said top 6 carriers. And that is still true.

Not its not- Sprint offers 16 phones. Nextel (#6) offers nine. And you did
say top 10 (I'll find the post to remind you).

>
> > AT&T was not capable of offering 7pm nights
>
> At the time I said it, it was true, I was repeating what folks
> in Bothell, Washington had told me.

It was true a week before they rolled it out? I don't think so. Lie.

>
>
> > AT&T would not match web prices at retail stores
>
> I said they didn't always, and they still dont always. That is still
> true, they do sometimes even though the web says their deals are
> Exclusive.

Answered already, although you are apparently having trouble with the big
words. The "Exclusive" deal revolves around free activation, instant
rebates, free shipping and bonus anytime minutes, as specifically stated on
the web site.

>
> > Cingular paid over $50B for AT&TW
>
> If you include the debt they are absorbing, and the likely loses on
> asset sales, it totals $50 Billion. How much did Cingular just lose
> with its fire sale of South American assests?

You obviously didn't learn your lesson- they pay $41B.......period.

>
> > Sprint PCS would be out of business by the end of the year
>
> I said SprintPCS as we know it wont be around, and they wont.
> The stock is disappearing, being merged with FON stock, to hid the loses.

You are saying that Sprint PCS, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Sprint
Corporation, will no long be Sprint PCS, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Sprint Corporation? Because that would make the wholly owned subsidiary as
we know it the same wholly owned subsidiary at the end of the year.
And......I'll bet the wireless financials will appear on Sprint's 10-Q
filings, just as they do now. How is that hiding losses?
>
> > Sprint has no team handling Retention
>
> I said their is no Retention Group anymore, and there isn't! Its a
> Cancellation Group that handles retention. I have posted a retention FAQ
> however. Perhaps its time to post it again.

They renamed the group, fool. You are the ONLY one to say otherwise, and
your lack of knowledge (as documented by your own postings) doesn't give you
any credibility.

>
> There: not one of the lies you ascribe to me is correct.

No- every one is correct.

>
> I also said:
>
> SprintPCS has repeatedly been rated worst in Customer Service.

Not for long.

>
> SprintPCS has secret warranties - i.e. on Sanyo 4500, and Samsung Black
> 8500; and for screens on only 4 phone models.

How is honoring the manufacturer's warranty a secret?

>
> So who is the liar now, and who blindly accepts every single corporate
> press release?

Where have I quoted a press release? Everything I mentioned came either
from a public website, or independently reported news source. You are just
a paranoid, little fool.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not its not- Sprint offers 16 phones. Nextel (#6) offers nine. And you did
> say top 10 (I'll find the post to remind you).


Go back to trolling the Nextel group from your desk in Denver.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > lame attempts to coverup his mistakes.
>
> Why foul mouthed. 22 postings on Usenet with the "F" word. 49 postings
> with the "S" word. Not to mention other gratuitoous insults for anyone
> that would disagree with him, let alone prove him wrong, like AT&T
> Wireless lying on its web pages.

At least I don't post lies, unfounded rumors, or spam newsgroups with
identical multiple postings. Too bad you can't say the same.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> You are just
> a paranoid, little fool.


To quote someone I saw on USENET:


From: Scott Stephenson ([email protected])
Subject: Re: tower 2 cell View
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.nextel
Date: 2004-03-22 12:49:12 PST

BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not its not- Sprint offers 16 phones. Nextel (#6) offers nine. And you
did
> > say top 10 (I'll find the post to remind you).
>
>
> Go back to trolling the Nextel group from your desk in Denver.

Funny- I don't see any postings from my desk- they all seem to generate from
Colorado Springs. Care to point out the postings you are referring to (with
headers)?

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You are just
> > a paranoid, little fool.
>
>
> To quote someone I saw on USENET:
>
>
> From: Scott Stephenson ([email protected])
> Subject: Re: tower 2 cell View
> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.nextel
> Date: 2004-03-22 12:49:12 PST
>
> BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude

Wow- you know guys, I think I may have finally struck a nerve with the
troll. Wish I knew what it was.

And Phil- two can play that game. I've been doing a little googling myself-
some pretty interesting reading, which I could easily share with the rest of
the group. And, like you, I can post it out of context- that makes it sound
even sicker than intended.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You are just
> > a paranoid, little fool.
>
>
> To quote someone I saw on USENET:
>
>
> From: Scott Stephenson ([email protected])
> Subject: Re: tower 2 cell View
> Newsgroups: alt.cellular.nextel
> Date: 2004-03-22 12:49:12 PST
>
> BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude


Would that be something like this?

From: [email protected] (DSL GURU)
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 23 Nov 2003 18:41:39 GMT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>


How lame and juvenile,

In article <[email protected]>,
"Robert M." <[email protected]> says:

>Why foul mouthed. 22 postings on Usenet with the "F" word. 49 postings
>with the "S" word. Not to mention other gratuitoous insults for anyone
>that would disagree with him

Oooh! Oooh! Now, do mine!

-Kenny

--
Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles
H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (310) 391-1898
W: 26601 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA 91302-1959 (818) 444-3685

"Kenneth Crudup" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Robert M." <[email protected]> says:
>
> >Why foul mouthed. 22 postings on Usenet with the "F" word. 49 postings
> >with the "S" word. Not to mention other gratuitoous insults for anyone
> >that would disagree with him
>
> Oooh! Oooh! Now, do mine!
>
> -Kenny
>

He forgot to the "M" word for me- 78 by my count- most directed at him.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...

> BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude

Frankly, Robert/Philipe/Artist Formerly Known As Troll, or whoever you
are, IMHO, nobody on Usenet hiding behind an alias (or 50) should get
to make ANY kind of personal attack against someone who has always
posted here with a real name.

From reading the crap you spout, I'd say Scott's use of just under two
dozen f-words makes him quite restrained.

(To the rest of the group, sorry I fed the troll...)

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Todd Allcock) wrote:

> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
>
> > BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude


I was quoting Scott Stephenson there, which you kindly omitted,
falsely making it appear it was my statement.

I thought the advice he gave there, between his trolls in the
Nextel USENET group she should apply to himself.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Todd Allcock) wrote:
>
> > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>...
> >
> > > BTW- I would lose the juvenile attitude
>
>
> I was quoting Scott Stephenson there, which you kindly omitted,
> falsely making it appear it was my statement.

Frankly I got lost trying to decipher who was ranting at who. My apologies
for mistakingly attributing a quote to you that you didn't write.

Regardless, it has no bearing on the rest of my post. Posts coming from a
real name trump those coming from a whiner with four dozen aliases.

You are a troll, and while Scott is perhaps a little too wrapped up in
"exposing" you, if one of you had to disappear from Usenet forever, guess
who I'd choose...





> I thought the advice he gave there, between his trolls in the
> Nextel USENET group she should apply to himself.