Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Robert
    Guest
    In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
    > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    >
    > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is interested
    > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for John
    > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.


    Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.



    See More: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR




  2. #2
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
    > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    > >
    > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is

    interested
    > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for

    John
    > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.

    >
    > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.


    Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    government. I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
    everything at others' expense. It totally fits your pattern- you don't
    fight your own battles (clogging up the legal system and regulatory agencies
    with misguided fervor), you do things for no other reason than "you can",
    and you consistantly argue for regulation in areas that require none. Not
    to mention the wild conspiracy theories you pollute Usenet with. You could
    possibly be more Kerry than Kerry.





  3. #3
    The other Donald
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
    > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    > > >
    > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is

    > interested
    > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for

    > John
    > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.

    > >
    > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.

    >
    > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    > government.


    Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
    12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA? What
    does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of dumbasses
    like the original poster?

    Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?



    > I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
    > everything at others' expense.


    Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
    still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and bull****
    strawmen....

    <snipped rest of redundant bull****>

    -Donald in Austin
    AA #2104





  4. #4
    rjdriver
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR

    >Or just admit you are
    > still stuck in the 70's,


    I have to admit, I'm a little lost as to the nature of this insult.
    Yes I was alive during the 70's, but as I remember, other than gas
    rationing, and Jimmy Carter, and the real end of the 60s music renaissance,
    the decade didn't seem to have a distict character to it like the 60s and
    80s. I'm not interested in the original post but would appreciate an
    explanation of how being called "stuck in the 70s" is an insult. Any one
    care to take a shot at it?


    Bob




    "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    >
    > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."

    <[email protected]>
    > > > wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
    > > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    > > > >
    > > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is

    > > interested
    > > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,

    for
    > > John
    > > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
    > > >
    > > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.

    > >
    > > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    > > government.

    >
    > Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
    > 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?

    What
    > does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of

    dumbasses
    > like the original poster?
    >
    > Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?
    >
    >
    >
    > > I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
    > > everything at others' expense.

    >
    > Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
    > still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and

    bull****
    > strawmen....
    >
    > <snipped rest of redundant bull****>
    >
    > -Donald in Austin
    > AA #2104
    >
    >






  5. #5
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    >
    > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."

    <[email protected]>
    > > > wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
    > > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    > > > >
    > > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is

    > > interested
    > > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,

    for
    > > John
    > > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
    > > >
    > > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.

    > >
    > > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    > > government.

    >
    > Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
    > 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?

    What
    > does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of

    dumbasses
    > like the original poster?
    >
    > Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?


    My twelve year old will be back next week- I'll have him translate it for
    you.

    >
    >
    >
    > > I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
    > > everything at others' expense.

    >
    > Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
    > still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and

    bull****
    > strawmen....


    The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you would
    see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of course,
    your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.


    >
    > <snipped rest of redundant bull****>
    >


    I should do the same.





  6. #6
    Robert
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you would
    > see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of course,
    > your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.


    Has Adelphia called you yet?



  7. #7
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you

    would
    > > see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of

    course,
    > > your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.

    >
    > Has Adelphia called you yet?


    Just talked to them today, as a matter of fact. Nice company, now that they
    are running outside of Rigas control. Upgraded both my cable and internet
    packages- got a little better d/l speed and a good kick in the u/l.

    Oh- and if that was some sort of veiled threat- nice try. You might want to
    read their TOS on Usenet usage- nothing even close to a violation here. You
    see, I don't spam groups with the same post multiple times a day, or
    purposely demunge email addresses. Can you say the same? Earthlink may
    disagree with you.





  8. #8
    The other Donald
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."

    > <[email protected]>
    > > > > wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see

    this
    > > > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
    > > > interested
    > > > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,

    > for
    > > > John
    > > > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
    > > > >
    > > > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
    > > >
    > > > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    > > > government.

    > >
    > > Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some

    ignorant
    > > 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?

    > What
    > > does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of

    > dumbasses
    > > like the original poster?
    > >
    > > Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?

    >
    > My twelve year old will be back next week- I'll have him translate it for
    > you.


    Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.

    So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail *****ed
    out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's name
    and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
    furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.

    But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
    about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality the
    government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton has
    been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.

    Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
    Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.

    -Donald in Austin
    AA #2104





  9. #9
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...

    >
    > Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.


    Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
    >
    > So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail *****ed
    > out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's name
    > and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
    > furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.


    Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing. I actually responded to
    the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a google
    search on the Robert M. ID will prove. Stop trying to be so omnipotent (or
    maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing your
    pissy little darts.

    >
    > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
    > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality

    the
    > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton

    has
    > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.


    I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts. I mentioned
    Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and bigger
    government. Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory agencies
    and expanded roles for those that already exist. The comparison is valid.
    The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.

    >
    > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
    > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.


    And your point is...?

    >
    > -Donald in Austin
    > AA #2104
    >
    >






  10. #10
    Rock
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
    > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality

    the
    > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton

    has
    > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
    >
    > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
    > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
    >
    > -Donald in Austin
    > AA #2104
    >
    >

    Hey numb nuts, Cheney doesn't work at Haliburton anymore and hasn't for some
    time. And he doesn't own it.Try something else.





  11. #11
    The other Donald
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Rock" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
    > > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality

    > the
    > > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton

    > has
    > > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
    > >
    > > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
    > > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
    > >
    > > -Donald in Austin
    > > AA #2104
    > >
    > >

    > Hey numb nuts, Cheney doesn't work at Haliburton anymore and hasn't for

    some
    > time. And he doesn't own it.Try something else.


    Buy a clue before you open your ****hole next time:

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040413-5.html

    That's the official Dick "Go **** Yourself" Cheney website, in April, 2004.

    Care to play again, Dumbass?

    -Donald in Austin
    AA #2104





  12. #12
    The other Donald
    Guest

    Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR


    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news[email protected]...
    >
    > >
    > > Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.

    >
    > Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
    > >
    > > So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail

    *****ed
    > > out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's

    name
    > > and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
    > > furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.

    >
    > Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing.


    I did, Dumbass, and I *accused* you of no such thing.

    Here's my words, since you could buy a ****ing clue:

    -0-0-
    Clueless Stephenson:
    > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
    > government.


    Donald in response:
    Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
    12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA? What
    does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of dumbasses
    like the original poster?

    -0-0-

    Hmmm. "...ignorant 12-year-old putting his (RobertM) name on a post..."
    referencing the forger, and "...the original poster." Again, referencing the
    forger.

    Do you get professional help for these afflictions of self-persecution?


    > I actually responded to
    > the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a google
    > search on the Robert M. ID will prove.


    Really? Kerry is supported by NAMBLA and the 'real' RobertM (I don't know
    how to make the zero-slash symbol) is admittedly a member?

    Damn.....



    > Stop trying to be so omnipotent (or
    > maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing your
    > pissy little darts.


    Try to get you head out of your ass and read what's put right in front of
    you, in context.


    >
    > >
    > > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
    > > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality

    > the
    > > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton

    > has
    > > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.

    >
    > I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts.


    Then I can assume that you were speaking of Republicans, using the same
    tired mantra that I've heard since I was 10.

    Glad you cleared the air and were actually referencing the neo-cons and
    their penchant for expanding the government.

    I'll sleep better knowing at least ONE of you dolts finally got it right.


    > I mentioned
    > Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and bigger
    > government.


    Shrub has already DONE IT.


    > Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory agencies
    > and expanded roles for those that already exist.


    So NAMBLA is getting a regulatory agency? And here I always though good law
    enforcement would be plenty.

    NAMBLA is in the subject of this thread, not anything about regulatory
    agencies. Or are you so adept at throuwing out the usual **** that it's like
    hitting a reflex nerve for you people.....

    "Bush is a liar" ".....you liberals want big government."

    "Osama escaped" "....it's all Clinton's fault."

    "Baseball" "....Kerry is ****ing Jane Fonda and I have a picture."

    All that has to be done is poke at one of your cherished myths, and you
    morons fire back with one non-sequitur load of **** after another.


    > The comparison is valid.
    > The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.


    Since the point I was addressing is the statement that alluded to is a
    'forger' using Robert's name and saying NAMBLA supporting Kerry, I'd
    certainly like to see your proof otherwise.


    >
    > >
    > > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
    > > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.

    >
    > And your point is...?


    Try reading the goddamn subject line and get back to me.

    -Donald in Austin
    AA #2104





  • Similar Threads