Results 1 to 12 of 12
- 08-01-2004, 10:50 PM #1RobertGuest
In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
> before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
>
> As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is interested
> in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for John
> Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
› See More: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
- 08-01-2004, 10:58 PM #2Scott StephensonGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
> > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
> >
> > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
interested
> > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for
John
> > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
>
> Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
government. I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
everything at others' expense. It totally fits your pattern- you don't
fight your own battles (clogging up the legal system and regulatory agencies
with misguided fervor), you do things for no other reason than "you can",
and you consistantly argue for regulation in areas that require none. Not
to mention the wild conspiracy theories you pollute Usenet with. You could
possibly be more Kerry than Kerry.
- 08-01-2004, 11:18 PM #3The other DonaldGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
> > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
> > >
> > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
> interested
> > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla, for
> John
> > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
> >
> > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
>
> Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
> government.
Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA? What
does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of dumbasses
like the original poster?
Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?
> I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
> everything at others' expense.
Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and bull****
strawmen....
<snipped rest of redundant bull****>
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
- 08-02-2004, 04:32 AM #4rjdriverGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
>Or just admit you are
> still stuck in the 70's,
I have to admit, I'm a little lost as to the nature of this insult.
Yes I was alive during the 70's, but as I remember, other than gas
rationing, and Jimmy Carter, and the real end of the 60s music renaissance,
the decade didn't seem to have a distict character to it like the 60s and
80s. I'm not interested in the original post but would appreciate an
explanation of how being called "stuck in the 70s" is an insult. Any one
care to take a shot at it?
Bob
"The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."
<[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
> > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
> > > >
> > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
> > interested
> > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,
for
> > John
> > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
> > >
> > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
> >
> > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
> > government.
>
> Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
> 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?
What
> does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of
dumbasses
> like the original poster?
>
> Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?
>
>
>
> > I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
> > everything at others' expense.
>
> Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
> still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and
bull****
> strawmen....
>
> <snipped rest of redundant bull****>
>
> -Donald in Austin
> AA #2104
>
>
- 08-02-2004, 04:44 PM #5Scott StephensonGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."
<[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see this
> > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
> > > >
> > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
> > interested
> > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,
for
> > John
> > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
> > >
> > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
> >
> > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
> > government.
>
> Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
> 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?
What
> does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of
dumbasses
> like the original poster?
>
> Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?
My twelve year old will be back next week- I'll have him translate it for
you.
>
>
>
> > I believe it comes out of a belief that you are entitled to
> > everything at others' expense.
>
> Would you care to offer a shred of proof of this? Or just admit you are
> still stuck in the 70's, replete with all the lame caricatures and
bull****
> strawmen....
The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you would
see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of course,
your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.
>
> <snipped rest of redundant bull****>
>
I should do the same.
- 08-02-2004, 04:57 PM #6RobertGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you would
> see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of course,
> your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.
Has Adelphia called you yet?
- 08-02-2004, 05:24 PM #7Scott StephensonGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The proof in in his posts. If you had taken the time to research, you
would
> > see his penchant for promoting big government and entitlements. Of
course,
> > your response indicates this might be a little too technical for you.
>
> Has Adelphia called you yet?
Just talked to them today, as a matter of fact. Nice company, now that they
are running outside of Rigas control. Upgraded both my cable and internet
packages- got a little better d/l speed and a good kick in the u/l.
Oh- and if that was some sort of veiled threat- nice try. You might want to
read their TOS on Usenet usage- nothing even close to a violation here. You
see, I don't spam groups with the same post multiple times a day, or
purposely demunge email addresses. Can you say the same? Earthlink may
disagree with you.
- 08-03-2004, 12:29 PM #8The other DonaldGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
> >
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > In article <[email protected]>, "Robert M."
> <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just thought I would repeat myself just in case you didn't see
this
> > > > > before. PLEASE the more the merrier.
> > > > >
> > > > > As everyone knows, I am a big supporter of NAMBLA. If anyone is
> > > interested
> > > > > in forming a support group, made up of those that are pro Nambla,
> for
> > > John
> > > > > Kerry, email me, call me, or post it here.
> > > >
> > > > Typical smear of the fascist cellular apologists.
> > >
> > > Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
> > > government.
> >
> > Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some
ignorant
> > 12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA?
> What
> > does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of
> dumbasses
> > like the original poster?
> >
> > Make some ****ing sense here, would ya?
>
> My twelve year old will be back next week- I'll have him translate it for
> you.
Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.
So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail *****ed
out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's name
and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.
But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality the
government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton has
been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
- 08-03-2004, 04:48 PM #9Scott StephensonGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
>
> Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.
Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
>
> So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail *****ed
> out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's name
> and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
> furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.
Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing. I actually responded to
the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a google
search on the Robert M. ID will prove. Stop trying to be so omnipotent (or
maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing your
pissy little darts.
>
> But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
> about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality
the
> government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton
has
> been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts. I mentioned
Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and bigger
government. Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory agencies
and expanded roles for those that already exist. The comparison is valid.
The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.
>
> Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
And your point is...?
>
> -Donald in Austin
> AA #2104
>
>
- 08-03-2004, 04:54 PM #10RockGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
> But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
> about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality
the
> government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton
has
> been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
>
> Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
>
> -Donald in Austin
> AA #2104
>
>
Hey numb nuts, Cheney doesn't work at Haliburton anymore and hasn't for some
time. And he doesn't own it.Try something else.
- 08-04-2004, 10:07 PM #11The other DonaldGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Rock" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
> > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality
> the
> > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton
> has
> > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
> >
> > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
> >
> > -Donald in Austin
> > AA #2104
> >
> >
> Hey numb nuts, Cheney doesn't work at Haliburton anymore and hasn't for
some
> time. And he doesn't own it.Try something else.
Buy a clue before you open your ****hole next time:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea...0040413-5.html
That's the official Dick "Go **** Yourself" Cheney website, in April, 2004.
Care to play again, Dumbass?
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
- 08-04-2004, 10:29 PM #12The other DonaldGuest
Re: REPEAT: NAMBLA = SMEAR
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>
> >
> > Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.
>
> Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
> >
> > So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail
*****ed
> > out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's
name
> > and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
> > furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.
>
> Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing.
I did, Dumbass, and I *accused* you of no such thing.
Here's my words, since you could buy a ****ing clue:
-0-0-
Clueless Stephenson:
> Smear? Your own posts indicate your love affair with Kerry and big
> government.
Donald in response:
Even if it were remotely true, what does it have to do with some ignorant
12-year-old putting his name on a post and associating it with NAMBLA? What
does Kerry have to do with NAMBLA, anyway, besides in the minds of dumbasses
like the original poster?
-0-0-
Hmmm. "...ignorant 12-year-old putting his (RobertM) name on a post..."
referencing the forger, and "...the original poster." Again, referencing the
forger.
Do you get professional help for these afflictions of self-persecution?
> I actually responded to
> the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a google
> search on the Robert M. ID will prove.
Really? Kerry is supported by NAMBLA and the 'real' RobertM (I don't know
how to make the zero-slash symbol) is admittedly a member?
Damn.....
> Stop trying to be so omnipotent (or
> maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing your
> pissy little darts.
Try to get you head out of your ass and read what's put right in front of
you, in context.
>
> >
> > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
> > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality
> the
> > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton
> has
> > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
>
> I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts.
Then I can assume that you were speaking of Republicans, using the same
tired mantra that I've heard since I was 10.
Glad you cleared the air and were actually referencing the neo-cons and
their penchant for expanding the government.
I'll sleep better knowing at least ONE of you dolts finally got it right.
> I mentioned
> Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and bigger
> government.
Shrub has already DONE IT.
> Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory agencies
> and expanded roles for those that already exist.
So NAMBLA is getting a regulatory agency? And here I always though good law
enforcement would be plenty.
NAMBLA is in the subject of this thread, not anything about regulatory
agencies. Or are you so adept at throuwing out the usual **** that it's like
hitting a reflex nerve for you people.....
"Bush is a liar" ".....you liberals want big government."
"Osama escaped" "....it's all Clinton's fault."
"Baseball" "....Kerry is ****ing Jane Fonda and I have a picture."
All that has to be done is poke at one of your cherished myths, and you
morons fire back with one non-sequitur load of **** after another.
> The comparison is valid.
> The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.
Since the point I was addressing is the statement that alluded to is a
'forger' using Robert's name and saying NAMBLA supporting Kerry, I'd
certainly like to see your proof otherwise.
>
> >
> > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
>
> And your point is...?
Try reading the goddamn subject line and get back to me.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.nextel
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.nextel
Creditare Eficientă
in Chit Chat