Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Rebranding ATT Wireless stores?

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Why in the world do you care what sign is on the building, it could be
    > "Harry's Mule Barn" and make no difference, as long as you are still
    > getting your cellphone service with no problems!!


    Fine, but if you read the thread we have plenty of reports of that not
    happening either.


    >
    >
    > "Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > Jim Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Al Klein wrote:
    > > > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:40:23 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
    > > > > said in alt.cellular:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >>Cant adequately address the issue of Cingular doing a POOR job of
    > > > >>rebranding AT&T Wireless stores?
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Rebranding the stores?
    > > > >
    > > > > I'd settle for activations that didn't take 4 hours on the phone to
    > > > > straighten out the foul-ups, lack of product availability, refusal to
    > > > > port AT&T numbers (as far as the customer is concerned, he's upgrading
    > > > > - why should he have to accept a changed number?)
    > > > >
    > > > > They can brand the stores anything they like for as long as they like.
    > > >
    > > > Just switched from ATTW to Cingular. Since I was on a family plan I
    > > > couldn't do it on line but went to a local Cingular store. No problems!
    > > > New phones we wanted, old numbers ported within minutes and great
    > > > service!!! Can't complain.

    > >
    > > Fine, but the complaint was that was all supposed to also happen at
    > > (former?) ATTWS stores as of Nov 15, but it aint so. ATTWS stores have
    > > switched over only in Cingular press releases.




    See More: Rebranding ATT Wireless stores?




  2. #32
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Rebranding ATT Wireless stores?

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Fri, 26 Nov
    2004 13:17:30 GMT, FUDMEISTER Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> Why in the world do you care what sign is on the building, it could be
    >> "Harry's Mule Barn" and make no difference, as long as you are still
    >> getting your cellphone service with no problems!!

    >
    >Fine, but if you read the thread we have plenty of reports of that not
    >happening either.


    Nothing out of the ordinary. Actually better than expected.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  3. #33
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Rebranding ATT Wireless stores?

    FUDMEISTER Jack has a bug up is behind about Cingular/ATTWS, is desperate to
    find something to criticize, and this is the best he can do.

    In <[email protected]> on Fri, 26 Nov 2004
    12:42:18 GMT, "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Why in the world do you care what sign is on the building, it could be
    >"Harry's Mule Barn" and make no difference, as long as you are still
    >getting your cellphone service with no problems!!
    >
    >
    >"Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> Jim Burke <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> > Al Klein wrote:
    >> > > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:40:23 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]>
    >> > > said in alt.cellular:
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > >>Cant adequately address the issue of Cingular doing a POOR job of
    >> > >>rebranding AT&T Wireless stores?
    >> > >
    >> > >
    >> > > Rebranding the stores?
    >> > >
    >> > > I'd settle for activations that didn't take 4 hours on the phone to
    >> > > straighten out the foul-ups, lack of product availability, refusal to
    >> > > port AT&T numbers (as far as the customer is concerned, he's upgrading
    >> > > - why should he have to accept a changed number?)
    >> > >
    >> > > They can brand the stores anything they like for as long as they like.
    >> >
    >> > Just switched from ATTW to Cingular. Since I was on a family plan I
    >> > couldn't do it on line but went to a local Cingular store. No problems!
    >> > New phones we wanted, old numbers ported within minutes and great
    >> > service!!! Can't complain.

    >>
    >> Fine, but the complaint was that was all supposed to also happen at
    >> (former?) ATTWS stores as of Nov 15, but it aint so. ATTWS stores have
    >> switched over only in Cingular press releases.

    >


    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  4. #34
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Rebranding ATT Wireless stores?


    "Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Why in the world do you care what sign is on the building, it could be
    > > "Harry's Mule Barn" and make no difference, as long as you are still
    > > getting your cellphone service with no problems!!

    >
    > Fine, but if you read the thread we have plenty of reports of that not
    > happening either.
    >


    And none of those references to service problems had anything to do with the
    rebranding of stores.. You need to come back to reality for a while.





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123