Compare V551 to RAZR

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 04:14:27 GMT, Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 22:04:30 -0700, Dick <LeadWinger> said in
>alt.cellular.cingular:
>
>>On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 04:16:04 GMT, Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 10:38:58 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
>>>said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>>>
>>>>Rock wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You paid $500 for a cell phone? Have you lost your mind? What is it going to
>>>>> do that your present phone doesn't?
>>>
>>>>Chicks dig the RAZR!
>>>
>>>It's the single most uncomfortable cell phone I've ever held.
>>
>>Apparently, you have never held the Motorola DynaTAC, circa 1984,
>>weighing 28 ounces.
>
>I keep a brick in my safe. It still works, although the battery
>doesn't hold a charge too long these days.
>
>The Razr is less comfortable.


Actually you can get the V3 for 399.00 with a one year contract from
A1wireless in NY.

---

› See More: Compare V551 to RAZR

But can you buy TWO?
"Jer" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Bob Horvath wrote:
>
>> Rock wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You paid $500 for a cell phone? Have you lost your mind? What is it
>>> going to
>>> do that your present phone doesn't?
>>
>>
>> Chicks dig the RAZR!
>
>
> jeezus h christ dude, you can buy a chick for an entire night for less
> than that! But, you wouldn't have all that cool **** hanging off your
> belt would you?
>
> --
> jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Craven Morehead wrote:

> But can you buy TWO?


Two RAZRs or two chicks? Oh, never mind, my question is irrelevant,
because the answer is the same for both. Yes, you can, you can buy
whatever you want. It's all available and the only question is how much.


--
jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'

On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:23:11 -0500, Bobbo <[email protected]> said
in alt.cellular.cingular:

>Actually you can get the V3 for 399.00 with a one year contract from
>A1wireless in NY.

I get considerably less than that.

Al Klein wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:23:39 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>
>
>>Actually, the old brick phones gave you a lot to wrap your hands around.
>> Plus you could cradle them on your shoulder if you had to.
>
>
> Compared to the Razr, which gives you a crick in your neck after about
> 3 seconds.

Bluetooth headsets are the best thing to happen to cellphones.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:48:29 -0600,
Bob Horvath <[email protected]> wrote:

>Al Klein wrote:

>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:23:39 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
>> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>>
>>>Actually, the old brick phones gave you a lot to wrap your hands around.
>>> Plus you could cradle them on your shoulder if you had to.
>>
>> Compared to the Razr, which gives you a crick in your neck after about
>> 3 seconds.
>
>Bluetooth headsets are the best thing to happen to cellphones.

Agreed!

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:48:29 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
said in alt.cellular.cingular:

>Al Klein wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:23:39 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
>> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>>
>>
>>>Actually, the old brick phones gave you a lot to wrap your hands around.
>>> Plus you could cradle them on your shoulder if you had to.
>>
>>
>> Compared to the Razr, which gives you a crick in your neck after about
>> 3 seconds.
>
>Bluetooth headsets are the best thing to happen to cellphones.

When I'm holding the phone and just have to use my hands for a few
seconds, I want a phone with thickness - I don't want to have to take
10 seconds putting on and taking off a headset.

Al Klein wrote:

> On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 00:48:29 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>
>
>>Al Klein wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:23:39 -0600, Bob Horvath <[email protected]>
>>>said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Actually, the old brick phones gave you a lot to wrap your hands around.
>>>>Plus you could cradle them on your shoulder if you had to.
>>>
>>>
>>>Compared to the Razr, which gives you a crick in your neck after about
>>>3 seconds.
>>
>>Bluetooth headsets are the best thing to happen to cellphones.
>
>
> When I'm holding the phone and just have to use my hands for a few
> seconds, I want a phone with thickness - I don't want to have to take
> 10 seconds putting on and taking off a headset.


But, Al, you're not going about this right... the world expects you to
get a BT headset with the cute, little blue light on it, and wear it
full time, like they do on TV. You're not expected to actually use the
damn thing, but you are expected to march around with cool **** sticking
out of your ear - or ears if you get a recent stereo model. Now, sit up
straight with both feet on the floor and get with the program.

--
jer email reply - I am not a 'ten'

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:10:58 -0600, Jer <[email protected]> said in
alt.cellular.cingular:

>But, Al, you're not going about this right... the world expects you to
>get a BT headset with the cute, little blue light on it, and wear it
>full time, like they do on TV. You're not expected to actually use the
>damn thing, but you are expected to march around with cool **** sticking
>out of your ear - or ears if you get a recent stereo model. Now, sit up
>straight with both feet on the floor and get with the program.


thanks for the giggles, Jer.