Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:55:02
    GMT, Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:32:52 GMT, John Navas
    ><[email protected]> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
    >
    >>In California, towers are owned by a joint venture between Cingular and
    >>T-Mobile. That joint venture is now being bought out by T-Mobile, with
    >>multi-year roaming being sold back to Cingular.

    >
    >You have to remember that Cingular got into the NY Metro market by
    >mistake.


    Huh?

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



    See More: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?




  2. #17
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?

    On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 05:40:01 +0000 (UTC), danny burstein
    <[email protected]> said in alt.cellular.cingular:

    >In <[email protected]> Al Klein <[email protected]> writes:


    >>You have to remember that Cingular got into the NY Metro market by
    >>mistake.


    >huh? all ears here. please tell...


    They deliberately got into the northern New Jersey market, not
    realizing that the eastern part of northern New Jersey (probably 2/3
    of it) is the NYC Metro market. They're /still/ ramping up after all
    this time.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12