Results 16 to 17 of 17
- 12-15-2004, 12:48 AM #16John NavasGuest
Re: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:55:02
GMT, Al Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:32:52 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>
>>In California, towers are owned by a joint venture between Cingular and
>>T-Mobile. That joint venture is now being bought out by T-Mobile, with
>>multi-year roaming being sold back to Cingular.
>
>You have to remember that Cingular got into the NY Metro market by
>mistake.
Huh?
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
› See More: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?
- 12-15-2004, 09:31 PM #17Al KleinGuest
Re: 850 or 1900 Mhz in California?
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 05:40:01 +0000 (UTC), danny burstein
<[email protected]> said in alt.cellular.cingular:
>In <[email protected]> Al Klein <[email protected]> writes:
>>You have to remember that Cingular got into the NY Metro market by
>>mistake.
>huh? all ears here. please tell...
They deliberately got into the northern New Jersey market, not
realizing that the eastern part of northern New Jersey (probably 2/3
of it) is the NYC Metro market. They're /still/ ramping up after all
this time.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.ericsson
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.verizon
Six weeks after starting the course, so much more relaxed!
in Chit Chat