John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
John Navas?


The reason for the question is obvious.

---

› See More: John Navas - Does Cingular pay you?

In article <[email protected]>,
"torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
> John Navas?
>
>
> The reason for the question is obvious.

He just takes blowjobs from the streetcorner dealers.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sun, 02 Jan 2005
19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:

>What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
>John Navas?

Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company) other
than as a customer.

>The reason for the question is obvious.

Not to me.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <[email protected]>,
John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.

Which tells all, John. Which tells all.

You're oblivious.

On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:20:20 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>He just takes blowjobs from the streetcorner dealers.

Not helpful ... actually less than worthless and quit immature. If
you can't play nice, then take your ball and go home.

In article <[email protected]>,
"<----- Which Way? ----->" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not helpful ... actually less than worthless and quit immature. If
> you can't play nice, then take your ball and go home.

Will you tell that to Navas next time he posts immature insults to
someone he disagrees with, or more likely has proven him wrong?

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Sun, 02 Jan
> 2005
> 19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
>>John Navas?
>
> Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
> other
> than as a customer.
>
>>The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

In article <[email protected]>,
"torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
> > other
> > than as a customer.
> >
> >>The reason for the question is obvious.
> >
> > Not to me.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> > John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
>
> So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

In the same manner that Al Qaeda believes in what they do. Yes.

In other words, you'll never stop him.

I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
generation.
"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Sun, 02 Jan
2005
> 19:48:52 GMT, "torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >What is the amount of money that Cingular pays you,
> >John Navas?
>
> Zero. I have no connection to Cingular (or any other cellular company)
other
> than as a customer.
>
> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>
> Not to me.
>
> --
> Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
> John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

In article <%[email protected]>,
"Leo Curran" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
> the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
> idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
> generation.

So you ignore his posts where he omits URLs, or insults others?

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:55:23 GMT, Leo Curran wrote:

>I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
>the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
>idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
>generation.

I have found *some* of his posts helpful too. At times, however, he is
arrogant and places himself out there as the be-all, end-all. While he
admits not being affiliated with Cingular, occasionally citing that
he's only a customer, he paints a picture of himself as the ultimate
cellular guru, quite often speaking as if he single-handedly founded
Cingular. When I started reading through this group several months
ago, I initially wondered why so many were "picking on him." The
reason is now quite obvious.

In article <[email protected]>,
Someone <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:55:23 GMT, Leo Curran wrote:
>
> >I have found Mr Navas's posts to be very helpfull and informative. Unlike
> >the very uninfomative and head in the sewer comments made by others. The
> >idea that someone just likes to be helpfull is lost on a lot of the younger
> >generation.
>
> I have found *some* of his posts helpful too. At times, however, he is
> arrogant and places himself out there as the be-all, end-all. While he
> admits not being affiliated with Cingular, occasionally citing that
> he's only a customer, he paints a picture of himself as the ultimate
> cellular guru, quite often speaking as if he single-handedly founded
> Cingular. When I started reading through this group several months
> ago, I initially wondered why so many were "picking on him." The
> reason is now quite obvious.

Exactly. He is to be commended for founding this newsgroup, but he still
thinks he can run it and control it, when as an unmoderated newsgroup,
nothing is further from the truth.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Sun, 02 Jan 2005
17:53:16 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >The reason for the question is obvious.
>>
>> Not to me.
>
>Which tells all, John. Which tells all.

Indeed.

>You're oblivious.

Backwards again.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan
2005 01:54:33 GMT, "torresD" <[email protected]> wrote:

>So you consider what you do a public service, Navas?

I do. Takes a fair amount of work to create a newsgroup like this. And you?

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 03 Jan
2005 15:48:42 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

>[John] is to be commended for founding this newsgroup, but he still
>thinks he can run it and control it, when as an unmoderated newsgroup,
>nothing is further from the truth.

Case in point: your behavior.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>