Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Mobile to Mobile

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on 11 Jan 2005 21:29:04 GMT,
    [email protected]pamfree (John S.) wrote:

    >>Do you have proof that "they" said that AT&T Wireless
    >>operations will be 100% integrated with Cingular operations on November
    >>15th?

    >
    >As near as I can remember the 15th of November date was for Mobile to Mobile
    >across platforms and that DID happen.
    >
    >Fully integrated can mean a number of things depending on your point of view.
    >It could be technology, marketing or even billing. Don't cut them short unless
    >you are more specific in what you are talking about when it comes to
    >integration.
    >
    >I can tell you that they ARE in the process of integrating cell site equipment
    >and that is going to be a long arduous task. Probably 2 years or more.....


    I'd be willing to bet less.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



    See More: Mobile to Mobile




  2. #32
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Mobile to Mobile

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Tue, 11 Jan
    2005 21:51:54 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected]pamfree (John S.) wrote:
    >
    >> >Do you have proof that "they" said that AT&T Wireless
    >> >operations will be 100% integrated with Cingular operations on November
    >> >15th?

    >>
    >> As near as I can remember the 15th of November date was for Mobile to Mobile
    >> across platforms and that DID happen.
    >>
    >> Fully integrated can mean a number of things depending on your point of view.
    >> It could be technology, marketing or even billing. Don't cut them short unless
    >> you are more specific in what you are talking about when it comes to
    >> integration.
    >>
    >> I can tell you that they ARE in the process of integrating cell site equipment
    >> and that is going to be a long arduous task. Probably 2 years or more.....

    >
    >or 4 or 6. They still havent integrated all the pieces stuck together to
    >makie Cingular 5 years ago.


    Irrelevant. Apples and oranges.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  3. #33
    Rod
    Guest

    Re: Mobile to Mobile


    "> Irrelevant. Apples and oranges.
    >

    Actually that's blueberries and oranges.





  4. #34
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Mobile to Mobile

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Fri, 14 Jan 2005
    14:49:11 GMT, "Rod" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >"> Irrelevant. Apples and oranges.
    >>

    > Actually that's blueberries and oranges.


    Good point.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123