Vilation of charter by "moderator" Navas

John Navas is guilty of the following.
In violation if his "charter".
A charter for an UNMODERATED group

The violation(s) include one or both of the following
Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service
Spam (including excessive cross-posting)

Posts to the following alt.cellular groups
cellular
attws
cingular
gsm
gsm carriers voicestream
nextel
sprintpcs
verizon




--
Andrew D. Sisson

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <9AYGd.144563$Uf.134622@twister.nyroc.rr.com> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:17:09
GMT, "Andy S" <adsisson@NOrochesterSPAM.rr.com> wrote:

>John Navas is guilty of the following.
>In violation if his "charter".
>A charter for an UNMODERATED group
>
>The violation(s) include one or both of the following
>Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service
>Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
>
>Posts to the following alt.cellular groups
> cellular
> attws
> cingular
> gsm
> gsm carriers voicestream
> nextel
> sprintpcs
> verizon

You're misinformed.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <elmop-F25A8A.05445918012005@text.usenetserver.com> on Tue, 18 Jan 2005
05:44:59 -0500, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <BC2Hd.2580$m31.30986@typhoon.sonic.net>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> >John Navas is guilty of the following.
>> >In violation if his "charter".
>> >A charter for an UNMODERATED group
>> >
>> >The violation(s) include one or both of the following
>> >Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service
>> >Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
>> >
>> >Posts to the following alt.cellular groups
>> > cellular
>> > attws
>> > cingular
>> > gsm
>> > gsm carriers voicestream
>> > nextel
>> > sprintpcs
>> > verizon
>>
>> You're misinformed.
>
>Hmmmm, a simple Google search will show the truth.

Indeed.

>Think you can stand up to the facts, John? Or are you just standing
>there, hands on hips, claiming things that simply aren't true?
>
>What will the FACTS show, John?

That (unlike you) my messages are consistent with the charter, on-topic and
not-spam.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford

"Andy S" <adsisson@NOrochesterSPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
news:9AYGd.144563$Uf.134622@twister.nyroc.rr.com.. .
> John Navas is guilty of the following.
> In violation if his "charter".
> A charter for an UNMODERATED group
>
> The violation(s) include one or both of the following
> Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service
> Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
>
> Posts to the following alt.cellular groups
> cellular
> attws
> cingular
> gsm
> gsm carriers voicestream
> nextel
> sprintpcs
> verizon
>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew D. Sisson
So does the above post violate the charter being that it is not directly
related to Cingular Wireless service?

Oh wait...I think I just violated the charter by posting this reply to an
off-topic post...darn it...

TC

"Tony Clark" <curiousgeorge1964@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:06nHd.10435$pZ4.1011@newsread1.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> "Andy S" <adsisson@NOrochesterSPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:9AYGd.144563$Uf.134622@twister.nyroc.rr.com.. .
> > John Navas is guilty of the following.
> > In violation if his "charter".
> > A charter for an UNMODERATED group
> >
> > The violation(s) include one or both of the following
> > Off-topic (not directly related to Cingular Wireless service
> > Spam (including excessive cross-posting)
> >
> > Posts to the following alt.cellular groups
> > cellular
> > attws
> > cingular
> > gsm
> > gsm carriers voicestream
> > nextel
> > sprintpcs
> > verizon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew D. Sisson
> So does the above post violate the charter being that it is not directly
> related to Cingular Wireless service?
>
> Oh wait...I think I just violated the charter by posting this reply to an
> off-topic post...darn it...



You will now be beaten with a 64k SIM and the exiled to the Nextel
newsgroup!

--
SS