Re: Anyone come to Cingular from Sprint?

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
news:elmop-E7D757.15473224072005@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
> Did anyone here move recently to Cingular from Sprint?
>
> If so, how would you compare the two?

I switched 6 weeks ago:

Sprint has better data throughput,

Cingular has better voice coverage.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <5LWEe.5332$U%6.3070@fe05.lga> on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:54:20 -0500,
"Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com> wrote:

>"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
>news:elmop-E7D757.15473224072005@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
>> Did anyone here move recently to Cingular from Sprint?
>>
>> If so, how would you compare the two?
>
>I switched 6 weeks ago:
>
>Sprint has better data throughput,
>
>Cingular has better voice coverage.

Here in the San Francisco Bay Area, Cingular has both better data throughput
and better voice coverage.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

I recently switched data plans from Sprint to Cingular and so far Cingular
wins, better speed and coverage for were I've used it.
If it's important to you, you can use Cingular data in Canada but Sprint
data won't work.

"Thurman" <thurman@bigplanet.com> wrote in message
news:5LWEe.5332$U%6.3070@fe05.lga...
> "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop@nastydesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:elmop-E7D757.15473224072005@nntp1.usenetserver.com...
>> Did anyone here move recently to Cingular from Sprint?
>>
>> If so, how would you compare the two?
>
> I switched 6 weeks ago:
>
> Sprint has better data throughput,
>
> Cingular has better voice coverage.
>