Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Kevin
    Guest
    I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
    T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
    V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
    rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to just
    move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
    would be the best pick? Thanks,

    KB





    See More: Motorola GSM phone opinions




  2. #2
    ô¿ô¬
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions


    "Kevin" <kberlenatticzdot.com> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    :I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
    : T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
    : V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
    : rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to
    just
    : move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
    : would be the best pick? Thanks,
    :
    : KB

    Have the v551 and the v3. The v3 reception is far better than the v551. I
    would recommend the v3. Either one will accept the T720's sim card.

    -Wayne





  3. #3
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:37:04 -0500,
    "Kevin" <kberlenatticzdot.com> wrote:

    >I am looking to buy a used Cincular GSM phone to replace my nearly worn out
    >T720. Current offerings that I am considering are the V180, V220, and the
    >V551. I could care less about camera and bluetooth features, just need a
    >rugged, reliable phone, as I am a heavy user. Would like to be able to just
    >move my SIM card over and keep running. Which of the three I have listed
    >would be the best pick? Thanks,


    The V180 and V220 are bargain phones with mediocre performance.

    The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance (comparable to
    the RAZR V3, notwithstanding the other earlier response to your question, as
    well as other phones.)

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  4. #4
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
    06:21:39 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance

    >
    >Bull****.


    You've actually said as much yourself, and I've previously explained why your
    unfortunate experience doesn't actually say anything about the V551.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  5. #5
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
    12:37:40 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> >> The V551 is an excellent high-end phone, with top performance
    >> >
    >> >Bull****.

    >>
    >> You've actually said as much yourself, and I've previously explained why your
    >> unfortunate experience doesn't actually say anything about the V551.

    >
    >And I've explained to you how full of bull**** you are, on many
    >different issues that you've brought up, yet you seem to think that you
    >are de facto the authority on anything you choose to speak on.


    Grow up.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  6. #6
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
    -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
    >good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
    >she's pleased with it.
    >
    ><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
    >it- >
    >
    >Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
    >not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...


    Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
    model.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  7. #7
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
    -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
    >>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
    >>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
    >>>she's pleased with it.
    >>>
    >>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
    >>>it- >
    >>>
    >>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
    >>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...

    >>
    >>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
    >>model.

    >
    >If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
    >I'd be more than glad to read it.


    That's a joke, right?

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  8. #8
    t72pwrd
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    Bull****!









    Sorry, had to do it, LOL

    "John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    >
    > In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
    > 11:45:05
    > -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
    >>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
    >>she's pleased with it.
    >>
    >><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
    >>it- >
    >>
    >>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
    >>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...

    >
    > Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
    > model.
    >
    > --
    > Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    > John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>






  9. #9
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005
    18:47:34 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> >And I've explained to you how full of bull**** you are, on many
    >> >different issues that you've brought up, yet you seem to think that you
    >> >are de facto the authority on anything you choose to speak on.

    >>
    >> Grow up.

    >
    >What? No "Nonsense!"? At least you don't deny it.


    How childish.

    >You do honestly
    >believe that you are de facto the authority on anything you choose to
    >speak on.


    Wrong again.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  10. #10
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:18:18
    -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:25:52 GMT, John Navas
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
    >>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
    >>><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
    >>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
    >>>>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
    >>>>>she's pleased with it.
    >>>>>
    >>>>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
    >>>>>it- >
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
    >>>>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
    >>>>
    >>>>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
    >>>>model.
    >>>
    >>>If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
    >>>I'd be more than glad to read it.

    >>
    >>That's a joke, right?

    >
    >Nope...Don't know you well enough to joke- If you don't have one,
    >then I'll take your post to be an "opinion" then.


    You are of course welcome to take my post however you want in any event.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  11. #11
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:18:21
    GMT, "t72pwrd" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Bull****!
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >Sorry, had to do it, LOL


    No self control?

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  12. #12
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Motorola GSM phone opinions

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 18:25:02
    -0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:42:28 GMT, John Navas
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:18:18
    >>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:25:52 GMT, John Navas
    >>><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:07:42
    >>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:35:41 GMT, John Navas
    >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>In <[email protected]> on Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:45:05
    >>>>>>-0700, Littleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>If your not interested in all the bells and whistles the V180 is a
    >>>>>>>good workhorse. I had it for a time and gave it to my daughter and
    >>>>>>>she's pleased with it.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>><disclaimer----Everybody's performance will depend on where they use
    >>>>>>>it- >
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>Some here will say that it's a low end product but keep in mind that
    >>>>>>>not long ago, it was a top billing product. ...
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Say what? With all due respect, the V180 has always been an entry-level
    >>>>>>model.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>If you want to show me a manufacture web page that would back that up,
    >>>>>I'd be more than glad to read it.
    >>>>
    >>>>That's a joke, right?
    >>>
    >>>Nope...Don't know you well enough to joke- If you don't have one,
    >>>then I'll take your post to be an "opinion" then.

    >>
    >>You are of course welcome to take my post however you want in any event.

    >
    >I can assure you, I need no assistance in that department.


    Thanks for sharing.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  • Similar Threads