Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: UMTS and HSDPA in November

    John Navas wrote:

    >>John, evidently you have a habit of reading titles and not subject
    >>matter.

    >
    >
    > I actually read them all.


    And the reailty of the facts whoosed by you like a freight train, it
    would seem.

    >>And last I checked, EVDO was a CRMS service. If spectrum is tight, it's
    >>tight for ALL CMRS services, including EVDO.

    >
    >
    > A *spectrum* crunch is not a *capacity* crunch on a given allocated piece of
    > spectrum (i.e., Verizon CDMA).


    You're splitting hairs now, and not doing it very well. A spectrum
    crunch generally is triggered by heavy demand and limited supply. What
    drives the demand for more spectrum? A demand for capacity.


    >>[additional insult deleted]


    Let me UNdelete what I said, because it wasn't an insult, and I would
    kindly ask that you not accuse me of something I didn't say.

    I wrote:

    >> But John, clearly you have an axe to grind and an ego to nurse, and
    >> clearly you will never acept that anyone else BUT you is right.


    If I had said "John, you're a egotistical lying maniac," THAT would have
    been an insult. But on the contrary, the above was a statement of my
    observations in regard to your often-sophomoric behavior, which is very
    unbecoming of an aspiring moderator.

    Clearly, you felt the need to delete what I wrote because you couldn't
    twist the wording around to MAKE it appear insulting. False accusations
    are not the way to win an argument, especially when a permament archive
    of what was said exists.


    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



    See More: UMTS and HSDPA in November




  2. #32
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: UMTS and HSDPA in November

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:20:19 -0500,
    Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:

    >John Navas wrote:


    >> I actually read them all.

    >
    >And the reailty of the facts whoosed by you like a freight train, it
    >would seem.


    And you just can't resist the urge to be insulting, it would seem.

    >> A *spectrum* crunch is not a *capacity* crunch on a given allocated piece of
    >> spectrum (i.e., Verizon CDMA).

    >
    >You're splitting hairs now, ...


    I disagree. They are two completely different things.

    >[further insults deleted]


    Have a nice day.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  3. #33
    GomJabbar
    Guest

    Re: UMTS and HSDPA in November

    >>> A *spectrum* crunch is not a *capacity* crunch on a given allocated piece of
    >>> spectrum (i.e., Verizon CDMA).


    >>You're splitting hairs now, ...


    > I disagree. They are two completely different things.


    They are two COMPLETELY RELATED things. Wake up and smell the coffee.

    I have found Isaiah Beard much more accurate and knowledgeable in his
    posts than you. You have knowledge in some areas, but unfortunately it
    is not as broad as you make out.




  4. #34
    J Robertson
    Guest

    Re: UMTS and HSDPA in November

    GomJabbar wrote:
    >>>> A *spectrum* crunch is not a *capacity* crunch on a given allocated piece of
    >>>> spectrum (i.e., Verizon CDMA).

    >
    >>> You're splitting hairs now, ...

    >
    >> I disagree. They are two completely different things.

    >
    > They are two COMPLETELY RELATED things. Wake up and smell the coffee.
    >
    > I have found Isaiah Beard much more accurate and knowledgeable in his
    > posts than you. You have knowledge in some areas, but unfortunately it
    > is not as broad as you make out.
    >

    You have it right. John Navas, hangs out here to satisfy a need to be
    expert in something. Unfortunately for John, his cover is blown. He
    really does not know a lot about cellular technology in general or that
    deployed by Cingular or other major cellular firms. His presence is
    largely unwelcome.




  • Similar Threads

    1. alt.cellular.cingular
    2. alt.cellular.ericsson



  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123