The FCC wants to hear from you

Anonymous wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:44:59 GMT, John Navas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> CU (publisher of Consumer Reports) didn't distinguish between GSM and TDMA,
>> much less handsets with and without ENS, which makes the survey badly flawed.
>
> In other words, it probably reflects the *AVERAGE* Cingular user.
>
> Probably a mix of GSM (some with/without ENS) and TDMA.
>
> Sounds prety valid good to me.
>
> It would be UNFAIR to survey only GSM with ENS users.

The number of remaining TDMA subscribers is small enough to make the
results accurate for Cingular GSM.

---

› See More: The FCC wants to hear from you

[email protected] wrote:

> I can't think of a valid reason to devote company resources to
> changing out one type of equipment for another unless you just have
> nothing else to do or resources are unlimited. Unless the lease was
> up, and there was a decision to be made. That could be a valid
> reason.
>
> Maybe the Ericsson equipment is actually better, and it may be. But
> the resources expended to change it out could have been used to fix
> dead spots, expand capacity, etc. Nope. They apparently have
> different priorities, at least in Southern California.
>
> Anyway, I don't care. I am not currently a Cingular customer. But I am
> sharing that with the world as verbatim information gleaned directly.
> I saw this happening with my own eyes, and I got the opinions of the
> technician who was there doing the work. Firsthand. Not hearsay as
> far as I am concerned.
>
> It may still be hearsay as far as you are but I have no axe to grind,
> I don't pay Cingular a cent and have no interest in their system
> performance.

Whatever, the bottom line is that there was a reason to make the change,
and the fact that you can't think of it, is immaterial.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:51:05
-0800, SMS <[email protected]> wrote:

>Anonymous wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 05:44:59 GMT, John Navas
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> CU (publisher of Consumer Reports) didn't distinguish between GSM and TDMA,
>>> much less handsets with and without ENS, which makes the survey badly flawed.
>>
>> In other words, it probably reflects the *AVERAGE* Cingular user.
>>
>> Probably a mix of GSM (some with/without ENS) and TDMA.
>>
>> Sounds prety valid good to me.
>>
>> It would be UNFAIR to survey only GSM with ENS users.
>
>The number of remaining TDMA subscribers is small enough to make the
>results accurate for Cingular GSM.

As I wrote, the inclusion of results from TDMA (blue and orange) and non-ENS
handsets (blue and orange) makes the results meaningless with regard to the
current GSM network using ENS, or any other specific technology segment for
that matter.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...

>
> As I wrote, the inclusion of results from TDMA (blue and orange) and
> non-ENS
> handsets (blue and orange) makes the results meaningless with regard to
> the
> current GSM network using ENS, or any other specific technology segment
> for
> that matter.
>


I see it didn't take you long to re-establish your inability to understand
even the most basic business priinciples. You have no data to back up your
statement and are simply grasping at straws to bolster your uneducated
claim.