| |  |
02-05-2006, 12:19 PM
|
#1 | | Guest | If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook to
the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB, using the
same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be caused by my
Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0) connection? I've tried it
with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side by side, so the position, and
time frame are the same) with the same results.
| | | | |
Cell Phone Links
| Advertisement
| |
02-05-2006, 01:28 PM
|
#2 | | Guest |
"NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook to
> the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB, using the
> same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be caused by my
> Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0) connection? I've tried it
> with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side by side, so the position, and
> time frame are the same) with the same results.
You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed that is
actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of 11Mbps. | | | |
02-05-2006, 02:16 PM
|
#3 | | Guest | "Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in news  psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook
>> to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB,
>> using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be
>> caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0)
>> connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side
>> by side, so the position, and time frame are the same) with the same
>> results.
>
> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
> 11Mbps.
>
>
>
Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then? | | | |
02-05-2006, 02:25 PM
|
#4 | | Guest | NoBody wrote:
> "Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in news psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
>
>> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook
>>> to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB,
>>> using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be
>>> caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0)
>>> connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side
>>> by side, so the position, and time frame are the same) with the same
>>> results.
>> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
>> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
>> 11Mbps.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then?
If it can be set to AUTO / Automatic, I would set it to that if it was mine | | | |
02-05-2006, 03:00 PM
|
#5 | | Guest | Your Name Here <mbb3977@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Vr6dnTHwa5jLwnvenZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@giganews.com :
> NoBody wrote:
>> "Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in
>> news psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
>>
>>> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>>>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old
>>>> Notebook to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get
>>>> is 115KB, using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would
>>>> this be caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its
>>>> v1.0) connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable
>>>> (sitting side by side, so the position, and time frame are the
>>>> same) with the same results.
>>> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
>>> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
>>> 11Mbps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then?
> If it can be set to AUTO / Automatic, I would set it to that if it was
> mine
>
No automatic selection... | | | |
02-05-2006, 04:20 PM
|
#6 | | Guest | NoBody <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote:
> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook to
> the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB, using the
> same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be caused by my
> Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0) connection? I've tried it
> with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side by side, so the position, and
> time frame are the same) with the same results.
I think there is something wrong with your desktop measurement.
I thought the Razr was only good for GPRS Class 10, and no EDGE at all. My
v551, with EDGE, gets around 100Kbps, not B, and you won't get 230, even
with EDGE. In a GPRS-only area, I get 30-40Kbps.
--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5 | | | |
02-05-2006, 09:23 PM
|
#7 | | Guest |
"NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9761A2C693DEEnobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
> Your Name Here <mbb3977@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Vr6dnTHwa5jLwnvenZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@giganews.com :
>
>> NoBody wrote:
>>> "Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>> news psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
>>>
>>>> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>>>>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old
>>>>> Notebook to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get
>>>>> is 115KB, using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would
>>>>> this be caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its
>>>>> v1.0) connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable
>>>>> (sitting side by side, so the position, and time frame are the
>>>>> same) with the same results.
>>>> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
>>>> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
>>>> 11Mbps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then?
>> If it can be set to AUTO / Automatic, I would set it to that if it was
>> mine
>>
>
> No automatic selection...
>
>
The speed you see on your computer may well be the port speed and nothing to
do with the data rate through your phone. As an example when I use VPN the
network connection icon tells me I have a 1GB link, which I can assure you
is not true. The WAP connection is pretty slow. | | | |
02-05-2006, 10:13 PM
|
#8 | | Guest | [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <Xns97619B5C43238nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131> on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 15:16:21
-0500, NoBody <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote:
>"Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in news psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
>
>> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old Notebook
>>> to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get is 115KB,
>>> using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would this be
>>> caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its v1.0)
>>> connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable (sitting side
>>> by side, so the position, and time frame are the same) with the same
>>> results.
>>
>> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
>> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
>> 11Mbps.
>
>Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then?
Yes.
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ> | | | |
02-05-2006, 10:15 PM
|
#9 | | Guest | [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <Xns9761A2C693DEEnobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131> on Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:00:05
-0500, NoBody <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote:
>[SNIP]
Binaries (e.g., uuencoded programs or pictures) should never be posted to
discussion newsgroups; most discussion newsgroups do not permit binary posts.
Post binaries to a *binaries* newsgroup only (or on a website or FTP server),
with a notice in relevant discussion newsgroup(s).
--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ> | | | |
02-11-2006, 06:10 PM
|
#10 | | Newbie | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Austinman "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9761A2C693DEEnobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
> Your Name Here <mbb3977@yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:Vr6dnTHwa5jLwnvenZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@giganews.com :
>
>> NoBody wrote:
>>> "Yeeehaaa" <not@bellsouth.net> wrote in
>>> news psFf.210$CO7.105@fe02.lga:
>>>
>>>> "NoBody" <nobody_special@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns976187879A0A2nobodyaolcom@216.196.97.131.. .
>>>>> If I use my RAZR, and Motorola Phone Tools to connect my old
>>>>> Notebook to the WAP@CINGULARGPRS.COM, the max connection I can get
>>>>> is 115KB, using the same setup on my Desktop PC, i get 230KB, would
>>>>> this be caused by my Notebook having an older USB (I think its
>>>>> v1.0) connection? I've tried it with Bluetooth, and USB Cable
>>>>> (sitting side by side, so the position, and time frame are the
>>>>> same) with the same results.
>>>> You'll have ot adjust the virtual com port speed. That is the speed
>>>> that is actually being reported to you. Older USB is capable of
>>>> 11Mbps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should the modem port speed be set at the highest maximum then?
>> If it can be set to AUTO / Automatic, I would set it to that if it was
>> mine
>>
>
> No automatic selection...
>
>
The speed you see on your computer may well be the port speed and nothing to
do with the data rate through your phone. As an example when I use VPN the
network connection icon tells me I have a 1GB link, which I can assure you
is not true. The WAP connection is pretty slow. |
[i]Regretably - no matter what the device connection speed (I have 960kbs for both bt and usb) your internet speed is totally throttled by the quality of the local wireless network. Sorry. Mine ( GPRS) is no better than a 24k dial-up modem most of the time - with all the tweaks I've done (sans hacking the actual code) - at best it looks like a 56k modem running a little slow. (sigh).
Good luck.
I monitor with ActivePorts, do timings with FasterFox and have all my custom settings peaked out. I use FileZilla for FTP and I enable up to 5 simultaneous connections. All of this makes a broadband connection scream for mercy but has zero effect on T-Mobile GPRS performance.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that T-Mobile et al are deliberately throttling over the air bandwidth. What jerks. | | | |
Cell Phone Links
| Advertisement
| |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | | |