Disabled Bluetooth Question

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Thu, 23 Mar 2006
23:21:24 GMT, DecaturTxCowboy <[email protected]> wrote:

>subdude wrote:
>> OK, so let me ask you directly, would you agree that revenue
>> generation is as likely a reason as liability and security?
>
>Verizon has gone on record as saying its a content licensing issue. I
>posted some links on that.

In other words, piracy, as I wrote.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

---

› See More: Disabled Bluetooth Question

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 23 Mar 2006
> 23:21:24 GMT, DecaturTxCowboy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>subdude wrote:
>>> OK, so let me ask you directly, would you agree that revenue
>>> generation is as likely a reason as liability and security?
>>
>>Verizon has gone on record as saying its a content licensing issue. I
>>posted some links on that.
>
> In other words, piracy, as I wrote.
>

No- they are not one in the same. You are wrong.

John Navas wrote:
> In other words, piracy, as I wrote.

Piracy and content licensing are two different things. Try again.