Re: A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry.

In article <C2F7A083.75061%dbowey@comcast.net>,
Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article 0uc4d3dsknukqndksdgqltqrge7oumrp7a@4ax.com,
> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote
> > in <C2E9A4C7.739F3%dbowey@comcast.net>:
> >
> >> On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article
> >> 0cq7c3def3f3rdpt56urvgf6c3ntekbk28@4ax.com,
> >> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote
> >>> in <C2C5616E.700B1%dbowey@comcast.net>:
> >>>
> >>>> On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article
> >>>> 1mtv93ticddur8rq3tghsra57n9508mci0@4ax.com,
> >>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
> >>>>> <tp94n4-17l.ln1@mail.specsol.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
> >>>>>>> start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must
> >>>>>>> also apply:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually more like 10 KHz.
> >>>>
> >>>> If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network
> >>>> channel/circuit,
> >>>> including cellular, it is about 3 kHz.
> >>>
> >>> Audio. Suggest you read more carefully.
> >>
> >> Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio
> >> bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz?
> >
> > No. Suggest you read more carefully.
>
> Suggest you kiss my ass.

I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post.

< Plonk >

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On 9/1/07 10:48 AM, in article
telamon_spamshield-BB9E55.1048480109...ws.prodigy.com,
"Telamon" <telamon_spamshield@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:

> In article <C2F7A083.75061%dbowey@comcast.net>,
> Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article 0uc4d3dsknukqndksdgqltqrge7oumrp7a@4ax.com,
>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote
>>> in <C2E9A4C7.739F3%dbowey@comcast.net>:
>>>
>>>> On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article
>>>> 0cq7c3def3f3rdpt56urvgf6c3ntekbk28@4ax.com,
>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote
>>>>> in <C2C5616E.700B1%dbowey@comcast.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article
>>>>>> 1mtv93ticddur8rq3tghsra57n9508mci0@4ax.com,
>>>>>> "John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
>>>>>>> <tp94n4-17l.ln1@mail.specsol.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium <glucegen1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
>>>>>>>>> start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must
>>>>>>>>> also apply:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually more like 10 KHz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network
>>>>>> channel/circuit,
>>>>>> including cellular, it is about 3 kHz.
>>>>>
>>>>> Audio. Suggest you read more carefully.
>>>>
>>>> Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio
>>>> bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz?
>>>
>>> No. Suggest you read more carefully.
>>
>> Suggest you kiss my ass.
>
> I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post.
>
> < Plonk >

Idiot. The reply goes to whatever distribution was set on the posted
message. Plonk yourself, Troll.

On Sep 1, 10:45 am, Telamon
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <UvCdncJlyIko1U_bnZ2dnUVZ_u6rn...@giganews.com>,
> "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com> wrote:
>
> > "John Navas" <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote in message
> >news:spd4d39jcfqoeubml2ssc4pniml8kelgu4@4ax.com.. .
>
> < Snip >
>

- John Navas is a notorious Troll in many news groups.
- Please do not respond to him in re.radio.shortwave.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California

Telamon - Was 'that' an Oops ? ;-}
{Please do not respond to him in re.radio.shortwave.}

DOH ! - Oops It Was For Me Too ! ) ~ RHF
.
.
.. .

On Sep 1, 10:48 am, Telamon
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article <C2F7A083.75061%dbo...@comcast.net>,
> Don Bowey <dbo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article 0uc4d3dsknukqndksdgqltqrge7oumr...@4ax.com,
> > "John Navas" <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey <dbo...@comcast.net> wrote
> > > in <C2E9A4C7.739F3%dbo...@comcast.net>:
>
> > >> On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article
> > >> 0cq7c3def3f3rdpt56urvgf6c3ntekb...@4ax.com,
> > >> "John Navas" <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey <dbo...@comcast.net> wrote
> > >>> in <C2C5616E.700B1%dbo...@comcast.net>:
>
> > >>>> On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article
> > >>>> 1mtv93ticddur8rq3tghsra57n9508m...@4ax.com,
> > >>>> "John Navas" <spamfilt...@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT, j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote in
> > >>>>> <tp94n4-17l....@mail.specsol.com>:
>
> > >>>>>> In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>> Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and
> > >>>>>>> start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>> a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must
> > >>>>>>> also apply:
>
> > >>>>>> The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz.
>
> > >>>>> Actually more like 10 KHz.
>
> > >>>> If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network
> > >>>> channel/circuit,
> > >>>> including cellular, it is about 3 kHz.
>
> > >>> Audio. Suggest you read more carefully.
>
> > >> Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio
> > >> bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz?
>
> > > No. Suggest you read more carefully.
>
> > Suggest you kiss my ass.
>

- I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross
post.
-
- < Plonk >
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California


Telamon - Was 'that' an Oops ? ;-}

{ I suggest you pay attention to the
news groups to which you cross post.}

sci.electronics.basics, rec.radio.shortwave,
rec.radio.amateur.antenna, alt.cellular.cingular,
alt.internet.wireless

DOH ! - Oops It Was For Me Too ! ) ~ RHF
.
plink, plink, plink,
.
Plank. Plank. Plank.
.
P L O N K ! - P L O N K ! - P L O N K !
.
plonk me if i haven't plonked myself again . . .
.
.
.. .