Results 1 to 10 of 10
- 10-05-2003, 11:42 AM #1Justin GreenGuest
"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
> to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
> and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
> best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
>
> [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
> > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
Here you go:
http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1
Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.
Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
research.
The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.
› See More: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
- 10-05-2003, 12:08 PM #2Peter PanGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
Instead of *****ing because the one page summary doesn't show the detail you
want, why not look at the full multipage detailed document at
http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/index.jsp (click on wireless)
"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
> > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
> > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
> > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
> >
> > [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
> > > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > [posted via phonescoop.com]
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
>
> Here you go:
>
> http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1
>
> Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.
>
> Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
> was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
> research.
>
> The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.
>
>
- 10-05-2003, 12:19 PM #3Justin GreenGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
"Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Instead of *****ing because the one page summary doesn't show the detail
you
> want, why not look at the full multipage detailed document at
> http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/index.jsp (click on wireless)
I'm not the one *****ing about lack of detail. I'm *****ing because people
do read the press release and then say stupid things like "wow, must have
taken REAL research to put them in alphabetical order" (paraphrased).
- 10-05-2003, 05:42 PM #4J on the phoneGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
While the original criticism was a bit simplistic, I do tend to agree
that the Power ratings are not as useful as some advertisers would
like consumers to believe.
The ratings are all about image and perception, not reality. Note the
headings do not include "Network Coverage" or "Quality of Service".
Why not? Because those who pay the bills for J.D. Powers, the
companies, are much more interested that prospective customers' views
of the companies are positive as opposed to whether current users are
happy with their service.
- 10-05-2003, 05:53 PM #5Justin GreenGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
"J on the phone" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> While the original criticism was a bit simplistic, I do tend to agree
> that the Power ratings are not as useful as some advertisers would
> like consumers to believe.
>
> The ratings are all about image and perception, not reality. Note the
> headings do not include "Network Coverage" or "Quality of Service".
> Why not? Because those who pay the bills for J.D. Powers, the
> companies, are much more interested that prospective customers' views
> of the companies are positive as opposed to whether current users are
> happy with their service.
This was a customer service survey, not a coverage survey, but your point is
well taken. It shows the results. Seeing the questions would be more
helpful, not only from the consumers' standpoints, but also the companies'.
That said, I doubt Sprint and the other companies don't know why they rated
where they did.
- 10-07-2003, 10:50 AM #6Mr TGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
could care less about the results.
"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
> > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
> > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
> > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
> >
> > [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
> > <[email protected]>:
> > > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
> > > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
> > >
> > > LOL
> > >
> > > [posted via phonescoop.com]
> >
> > [posted via phonescoop.com]
>
>
> Here you go:
>
> http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1
>
> Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.
>
> Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
> was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
> research.
>
> The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.
>
>
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-07-2003, 11:04 AM #7JustinGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
> word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
> care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
> like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
> an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
> don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
> could care less about the results.
You did:
> > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
> > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
> > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
> > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
- 10-07-2003, 11:42 AM #8Mr TGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
I'm not Rob.
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
> > word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
> > care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
> > like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
> > an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
> > don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
> > could care less about the results.
>
>
> You did:
>
> > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
> > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
> > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
> > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
>
>
>
[posted via phonescoop.com]
- 10-07-2003, 11:47 AM #9JustinGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
> about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
> I'm not Rob.
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
> > > word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I
don't
> > > care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
> > > like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
> > > an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
> > > don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
> > > could care less about the results.
> >
> >
> > You did:
> >
> > > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL"
research
> > > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the
page
> > > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are
the
> > > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
> >
> >
> >
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
I simply corrected your stupid ass. Get over it.
- 10-07-2003, 08:41 PM #10Justin GreenGuest
Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?
"Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
> about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
> I'm not Rob.
You said the survey was what, how did you put it, "crap", not "REAL"
research.
Just answer the question. If you don't care about the study, you can't find
any support for bashing it, why do you get so offended when I corrected you
about it?
Similar Threads
- Sony Ericsson
- LG
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
Lifeline cell phone service
in Chit Chat