Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Justin Green
    Guest

    "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
    > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
    > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
    > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
    >
    > [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
    > <[email protected]>:
    > > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
    > > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
    > >
    > > LOL
    > >
    > > [posted via phonescoop.com]

    >
    > [posted via phonescoop.com]



    Here you go:

    http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1

    Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.

    Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
    was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
    research.

    The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.





    See More: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?




  2. #2
    Peter Pan
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?

    Instead of *****ing because the one page summary doesn't show the detail you
    want, why not look at the full multipage detailed document at
    http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/index.jsp (click on wireless)


    "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
    > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
    > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
    > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
    > >
    > > [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
    > > <[email protected]>:
    > > > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
    > > > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
    > > >
    > > > LOL
    > > >
    > > > [posted via phonescoop.com]

    > >
    > > [posted via phonescoop.com]

    >
    >
    > Here you go:
    >
    > http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1
    >
    > Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.
    >
    > Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
    > was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
    > research.
    >
    > The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.
    >
    >






  3. #3
    Justin Green
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?


    "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Instead of *****ing because the one page summary doesn't show the detail

    you
    > want, why not look at the full multipage detailed document at
    > http://www.jdpower.com/cc/telecom/index.jsp (click on wireless)



    I'm not the one *****ing about lack of detail. I'm *****ing because people
    do read the press release and then say stupid things like "wow, must have
    taken REAL research to put them in alphabetical order" (paraphrased).





  4. #4
    J on the phone
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?

    While the original criticism was a bit simplistic, I do tend to agree
    that the Power ratings are not as useful as some advertisers would
    like consumers to believe.

    The ratings are all about image and perception, not reality. Note the
    headings do not include "Network Coverage" or "Quality of Service".
    Why not? Because those who pay the bills for J.D. Powers, the
    companies, are much more interested that prospective customers' views
    of the companies are positive as opposed to whether current users are
    happy with their service.



  5. #5
    Justin Green
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?


    "J on the phone" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > While the original criticism was a bit simplistic, I do tend to agree
    > that the Power ratings are not as useful as some advertisers would
    > like consumers to believe.
    >
    > The ratings are all about image and perception, not reality. Note the
    > headings do not include "Network Coverage" or "Quality of Service".
    > Why not? Because those who pay the bills for J.D. Powers, the
    > companies, are much more interested that prospective customers' views
    > of the companies are positive as opposed to whether current users are
    > happy with their service.



    This was a customer service survey, not a coverage survey, but your point is
    well taken. It shows the results. Seeing the questions would be more
    helpful, not only from the consumers' standpoints, but also the companies'.

    That said, I doubt Sprint and the other companies don't know why they rated
    where they did.





  6. #6
    Mr T
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?

    Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
    word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
    care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
    like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
    an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
    don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
    could care less about the results.

    "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    >
    > "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
    > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
    > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
    > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.
    > >
    > > [email protected] (Sam Iam) wrote in article
    > > <[email protected]>:
    > > > Well there is an intelligent and well substantiated opinion. Surely we
    > > > should all believe the "Mr T" study.
    > > >
    > > > LOL
    > > >
    > > > [posted via phonescoop.com]

    > >
    > > [posted via phonescoop.com]

    >
    >
    > Here you go:
    >
    > http://www.jdpower.com/news/releases...03074&search=1
    >
    > Lists them in order, along with the number ratings.
    >
    > Must take a real genius to look at one press release and say "all they did
    > was list the other companies in alphabetical order" without doing the
    > research.
    >
    > The survey is crap because your dumb ass doesn't like the results.
    >
    >


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  7. #7
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?


    "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
    > word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
    > care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
    > like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
    > an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
    > don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
    > could care less about the results.



    You did:

    > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
    > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
    > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
    > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.







  8. #8
    Mr T
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?

    Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
    about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
    I'm not Rob.

    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    >
    > "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
    > > word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I don't
    > > care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
    > > like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
    > > an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
    > > don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
    > > could care less about the results.

    >
    >
    > You did:
    >
    > > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL" research
    > > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the page
    > > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are the
    > > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.

    >
    >
    >


    [posted via phonescoop.com]



  9. #9
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?


    "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
    > about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
    > I'm not Rob.
    >
    > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
    > <[email protected]>:
    > >
    > > "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > Listen here "TROLL" who said anything about the results. What's the
    > > > word you use for Rob, "drivel" that's what you're speaking now. I

    don't
    > > > care about the results. I'm saying a survey with no details is just
    > > > like your posts.........crap. I guess since you couldn't come up with
    > > > an answer on the lack of details you had make an excuse for the fact I
    > > > don't care for the survey by saying it's the results. Like I said, I
    > > > could care less about the results.

    > >
    > >
    > > You did:
    > >
    > > > > I didn't say anything about a study. It must take some "REAL"

    research
    > > > > to list all the carriers in Alphabetical order on the left of the

    page
    > > > > and put a couple of them to the right of the page and say these are

    the
    > > > > best. That survey is a heap of crap unless they go into DETAILS.

    > >
    > >
    > >

    >
    > [posted via phonescoop.com]


    I simply corrected your stupid ass. Get over it.





  10. #10
    Justin Green
    Guest

    Re: What's with the "alphabetical list" bull****?


    "Mr T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Once again, unless you're absolutely blind. I never mentioned caring
    > about the results. End of discussion. You're not going to TROLL me,
    > I'm not Rob.


    You said the survey was what, how did you put it, "crap", not "REAL"
    research.

    Just answer the question. If you don't care about the study, you can't find
    any support for bashing it, why do you get so offended when I corrected you
    about it?





  • Similar Threads