Results 1 to 15 of 130
- 03-12-2004, 03:06 AM #1yusuf786Guest
Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good. In
the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their
products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2
years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I had
my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
P900........
regards
› See More: SE vs NOKIA
- 03-12-2004, 03:15 AM #2Ivor JonesGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so
good. In
> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now
their
> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after
2
> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
had
> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
> P900........
Nokia 6310i, best phone on the market IMHO. No frills, no fuss, no silly
cameras or colour screens, it does what it says on the box, makes and
receives phone calls.
Ivor
- 03-12-2004, 03:31 AM #3FryGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so
> good. In the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff,
> but now their products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look
> at the t68, after 2 years still selling for $500 here in Australia.
> No Nokia can do that. I had my t68i for two years & still love it
> even though I just upgraded to a P900........
But the T68i is a horrible phone!
(IMHO)
- 03-12-2004, 03:40 AM #4[BnH]Guest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
2nd that.
Unfortunately R520m was more of a prototype phone rather fully marketed
ones.
Longer battery life than the T68[i] due to the monochrome screen.
=bob=
"tHatDudeUK" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> And now it's nearly 3 years old and represents a much better phone than
> anything nokia had to offer at the time.
>
>
- 03-12-2004, 03:53 AM #5thegoonsGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
Or look at the Ericcson 1288C, selling for $13 at DSE
"yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good.
In
> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their
> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2
> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
had
> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
> P900........
>
> regards
>
>
- 03-12-2004, 04:44 AM #6AlbinusGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Or look at the Ericcson 1288C, selling for $13 at DSE
You mean the 1228c? Got one here, a simple, no frills CDMA phone that
doesn't seem to have the legendary Ericsson firmware "issues".
Albinus.
- 03-12-2004, 05:21 AM #71013Guest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
It is a great phone just not small enough.
"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so
> good. In
> > the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now
> their
> > products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after
> 2
> > years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
> had
> > my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
> > P900........
>
> Nokia 6310i, best phone on the market IMHO. No frills, no fuss, no silly
> cameras or colour screens, it does what it says on the box, makes and
> receives phone calls.
>
> Ivor
>
>
- 03-12-2004, 05:59 AM #8JonGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good.
In
> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their
> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2
> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
had
> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
> P900........
>
> regards
>
>
I agree, I've had a T68i for about 18 months and I love It! *MUCH better
after R8A upgrade*. About 3 weeks ago my Brother Bought a Z600, WHAT AN
AMAZING PHONE! - nothing from Nokia can match it, *7200 - tiny screen,
stupid keypadŽ, express-on FablonŽ.*
My next Sony Ericsson phone is going to be the sexy new K700
http://www.esato.com/news/article.php/id=57
Sexy Phones
http://www.sonyericsson.com
Toy Phones
http://www.nokia.com
- 03-12-2004, 07:38 AM #9a_dudeGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
what crap...just cuz monkeys buy brand names cuz they dont know any
different....
all my mates are green with envy and they have sony, ericsons and all the
other crap phones...
they see what my nokia does and cry...
and yes people love getting ripped off cuz they dont know whats
new.....after all stupid monkeys DO listen to the phone salesmen instead of
researching for themselves...
btw the sony screens are so crap, id use em as a toilet accessory...
"yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good.
In
> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their
> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2
> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
had
> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
> P900........
>
> regards
>
>
- 03-12-2004, 07:44 AM #10JerGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
Jon wrote:
> I agree, I've had a T68i for about 18 months and I love It! *MUCH better
> after R8A upgrade*. About 3 weeks ago my Brother Bought a Z600, WHAT AN
> AMAZING PHONE! - nothing from Nokia can match it, *7200 - tiny screen,
> stupid keypadŽ, express-on FablonŽ.*
>
> My next Sony Ericsson phone is going to be the sexy new K700
>
> http://www.esato.com/news/article.php/id=57
>
> Sexy Phones
> http://www.sonyericsson.com
>
> Toy Phones
> http://www.nokia.com
Curiously, I took a stroll through the marketing info on both these web
sites - what a crock! Sexy? Jon, are you going to make phone calls or
are you going to **** it?
--
jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' ICQ = 35253273
"All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of
what we know." -- Richard Wilbur
- 03-12-2004, 08:17 AM #11Richard ColtonGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"a_dude" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> what crap...just cuz monkeys buy brand names cuz they dont know any
> different....
Err.... yeah... and your actual point is? Or are you just trolling?
>
> all my mates are green with envy and they have sony, ericsons and all the
> other crap phones...
Yeah, if you say so Mr Troll.
>
> they see what my nokia does and cry...
With laughter.
Unlike yourself, I can see the up and downside to Nokias and Ericssons. The
Nokias (generally) feel cheap and plasticky and have to rely on such
gimmicks as X-Press on covers and FM radios. Ericssons on the other hand
are solidly built, reliable and have worthwhile features such as BlueTooth
that actually work without having to upgrade the firmware every other week
and sacrificing virgins to the Nokia CEO.
>
> and yes people love getting ripped off cuz they dont know whats
> new.....after all stupid monkeys DO listen to the phone salesmen instead
of
> researching for themselves...
About the only thing in your post that makes any sense, and that I can agree
with. I did my research, and that's exactly why I bought Ericsson - because
at the end of the day Nokia only make one decent handset (6310i). If you
want a toy, by all means buy Nokia. If youwant a phone then you'll have to
look elsewhere. Ericsson or Samsung are usually a better bet.
>
> btw the sony screens are so crap, id use em as a toilet accessory...
Yeah, yeah. Go back to wanking over strip poker on your 3510i then, the
rest of us will enjoy the far superior screens fitted to the latest SE
offerings.
--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> http://www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<
>>> http://www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
- 03-12-2004, 10:15 AM #12Ivor JonesGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"1013" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> It is a great phone just not small enough.
Just the right size for me, any smaller and my fingers have trouble
hitting 2 keys at once.
BTW could you not top post please, it throws the thread out, thanks.
Ivor
- 03-12-2004, 10:29 AM #13Tim DownieGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
Fry wrote:
>> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so
>> good. In the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff,
>> but now their products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look
>> at the t68, after 2 years still selling for $500 here in Australia.
>> No Nokia can do that. I had my t68i for two years & still love it
>> even though I just upgraded to a P900........
>
> But the T68i is a horrible phone!
> (IMHO)
I would agree. My wife bought one but found it fiddly to use and hopeless
for receving texts with as the text alert tone was far too feeble. The
joystick is a horrible gimmicky thing to use and all in all, despite its
spec, an unpleasant little phone.
Changed it for a Nokia 6310i with which she is much happier. Yes Nokia do
make some duff phones but then so do SE.
Tim
--
Remove the obvious to reply by email.
Please support rheumatoid arthritis research!
Visit http://www.justgiving.com/pfp/speyside or
http://www.justgiving.com/speyside if you're a UK tax payer.
- 03-12-2004, 11:32 AM #14OdetteGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
"a_dude" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> what crap...just cuz monkeys buy brand names cuz they dont know any
> different....
>
> all my mates are green with envy and they have sony, ericsons and all
> the other crap phones...
>
> they see what my nokia does and cry...
>
> and yes people love getting ripped off cuz they dont know whats
> new.....after all stupid monkeys DO listen to the phone salesmen
> instead of researching for themselves...
>
> btw the sony screens are so crap, id use em as a toilet accessory...
>
And then you call yourself a_dude? What a perfect world ;-)
- 03-12-2004, 11:55 AM #15michael turnerGuest
Re: SE vs NOKIA
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:59:33 +0000, Jon wrote:
>
> "yusuf786" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Why is it that these days Nokia is such crap and Sonyericsson is so good.
> In
>> the days of the 3810 & 6150 Nokia was making quality stuff, but now their
>> products are just toys & yuppie junk..............Look at the t68, after 2
>> years still selling for $500 here in Australia. No Nokia can do that. I
> had
>> my t68i for two years & still love it even though I just upgraded to a
>> P900........
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>
> I agree, I've had a T68i for about 18 months and I love It! *MUCH better
> after R8A upgrade*.
I had a t68 for two years, and replaced it recently with a *Nokia* 6100.
> About 3 weeks ago my Brother Bought a Z600, WHAT AN
> AMAZING PHONE! - nothing from Nokia can match it, *7200 - tiny screen,
> stupid keypadŽ, express-on FablonŽ.*
>
> My next Sony Ericsson phone is going to be the sexy new K700
>
> http://www.esato.com/news/article.php/id=57
How can a mobile-phone be 'sexy', are you going to *masturbate* with it or
something..surely it's much cheaper just to buy a dildo.
> Sexy Phones
> http://www.sonyericsson.com
>
> Toy Phones
> http://www.nokia.com
Sad or what.
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
Similar Threads
- Kyocera
- alt.cellular.ericsson
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.motorola
- alt.cellular.nokia
Newbie Member
in New Member Introductions