T630 or Z600

What is the difference between the above 2 handsets apart from the obvious body
style? I have a T300 just now and have had problems with 'no access' and
dropped calls. Do any of these handsets suffer from the same problem?

btw I'm on T-Mobile(UK)

--

Hide the chocolate biscuits before emailing me

---

› See More: T630 or Z600

On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:40:58 -0000, Eddie
<[email protected]> wrote some stuff about "T630 or
Z600", to which I would like to add the following:

>What is the difference between the above 2 handsets apart from the obvious body
>style? I have a T300 just now and have had problems with 'no access' and
>dropped calls. Do any of these handsets suffer from the same problem?

As far as I know they're completely identical. My girlfriend had a hard time
choosing between the two based on pictures and specs and reviews. Until she
held them in her hand. She went for the T630 that looks much nicer, though
personally I hate that little joystick. I would probably have taken the Z600,
which was cheaper, too.

New phones coming out soon though by SE.. More improvements on the way,
especially on the ****ty useless camera.

Cheers,
Chanchao

the Z600 SAR is much lower than the T630's (0,08 W/kg vs 0,88W/kg)

"Chanchao" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:40:58 -0000, Eddie
> <[email protected]> wrote some stuff about "T630 or
> Z600", to which I would like to add the following:
>
> >What is the difference between the above 2 handsets apart from the
obvious body
> >style? I have a T300 just now and have had problems with 'no access' and
> >dropped calls. Do any of these handsets suffer from the same problem?
>
> As far as I know they're completely identical. My girlfriend had a hard
time
> choosing between the two based on pictures and specs and reviews. Until
she
> held them in her hand. She went for the T630 that looks much nicer,
though
> personally I hate that little joystick. I would probably have taken the
Z600,
> which was cheaper, too.
>
> New phones coming out soon though by SE.. More improvements on the way,
> especially on the ****ty useless camera.
>
> Cheers,
> Chanchao

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:50:33 +0100, <a> wrote some stuff about "Re: T630 or
Z600", to which I would like to add the following:

>the Z600 SAR is much lower than the T630's (0,08 W/kg vs 0,88W/kg)

SAR? Size to.. . . . aa.. Ratio?

And does that matter?

Cheers,
Chanchao

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:55:41 +0700, Chanchao
<[email protected]> wrote:

>SAR? Size to.. . . . aa.. Ratio?
>
>And does that matter?

SAR is the "How much it cooks your brain rating". SO yes it would
matter to most people :-) Higher the number the worse it is...
--
Munch

"Munch" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:55:41 +0700, Chanchao
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >SAR? Size to.. . . . aa.. Ratio?
> >
> >And does that matter?
>
> SAR is the "How much it cooks your brain rating". SO yes it would
> matter to most people :-) Higher the number the worse it is...
> --
> Munch

I thought the radiation level (SAR) has not been conclusively linked to
'brain-cooking'? There are some fabulous protectors you can get, just to be
safe though... ;-)

With these things, the level of radiation isn't that important. All mobiles
on sale are within 'safe' (as far as we know) levels. I wouldn't use that as
a factor in choosing a new phone, especially when trading off the brick Z600
against the svelte T630!



Dylan http://bassnote.tk