Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Tony Clark
    Guest

    Re: T226 vs T68i AT&T swap (my personal experiences)


    "Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles" <[email protected]> wrote
    in message news:[email protected]...
    SNIP

    > In all seriousness, the issue isn't that AT&T sent us a free phone. The
    > issue is that they rendered the $250 investment I made with them (on a
    > T68i), only 8 months ago, useless. If they wanted to give me a discount

    on
    > a new, similar replacement phone (such as a T616), great! But so far they
    > want to sell me a T616 for about twice what they'd charge a new customer.
    >
    > Do you think it unreasonable to expect them to sell me a T616 for the same
    > price as a new customer, if I agree to a contract extension? If not, why
    > not?
    >
    > For what it's worth, assuming that the T616 has similar reception to the
    > T226, I'd be one happy camper with that combo. I'd have working bluetooth
    > again (which is the biggest issue with the T226; really, it's the *only*
    > issue I really care about with the T226/T68i thing), and a phone with

    great
    > reception. What more would anybody need? C'mon AT&T, make me happy!

    Throw
    > this dog a bone. :>)
    >
    > --Mike--
    > Chain Reaction Bicycles
    > www.ChainReaction.com
    >

    Mike, you hit the nail right on the head as far as I am concerned. Yes I am
    happy that ATT tried to do the right thing and sent me a phone that has
    better reception. But, as you stated, I'd have to give up some features such
    as Bluetooth that were a primary reason for going with the T68i in the first
    place. Other than reception the T68i does everything I need a phone to do.
    The T616 looks like a great follow on and is probably what I will go with
    but not until the prices come down a bit.

    I have been an ATT customer for nearly 9 years now and my contract has often
    been at the $100 level or above. I don't expect ATT to give me a free phone
    but it sure would have been nice to get a good discount on the T616 instead
    of the free T226. I personally think their policy of favoring new customers
    over long time customers sucks.

    Cheers
    TC





    See More: T226 vs T68i AT&T swap (my personal experiences)




  2. #17
    Pete S
    Guest

    Re: T226 vs T68i AT&T swap (my personal experiences)

    >
    > By the way ATTWS didnt send you anything. Sony Ericsson did as a
    > courtesy to customers who had their equipment that did not support
    > 850, a band that ATTWS will have overlayed all over their entire nat'l
    > network by june of 04. Its a free phone with no strings attatched, so
    > i feel that there should be no fussing about it at all. It was free so
    > take it and be happy.
    >


    all understood. but it is miss-leading to call it an "upgrade". i am glad
    that i checked the specs first before i would have eventually sent the 68i
    back. i got that one specifically for international roaming, ir. i think the
    226i is sh... - only upgrade are the ring tones, it looks cheap.

    peter.





  3. #18

    Re: T226 vs T68i AT&T swap (my personal experiences)

    I totaly agree with you TC.
    Although I find that AT&T customer service sucks ass, I am still on of
    their customers (till I find another provider) and I have no use of
    the T226 they sent me other my T68i going bad.
    I would have better appreciated a good discount on a T616 even if I
    had to send my T68i back.
    The Globule

    On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:01:42 GMT, "Tony Clark"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >"Mike Jacoubowsky/Chain Reaction Bicycles" <[email protected]> wrote
    >in message news:[email protected]...
    >SNIP
    >
    >> In all seriousness, the issue isn't that AT&T sent us a free phone. The
    >> issue is that they rendered the $250 investment I made with them (on a
    >> T68i), only 8 months ago, useless. If they wanted to give me a discount

    >on
    >> a new, similar replacement phone (such as a T616), great! But so far they
    >> want to sell me a T616 for about twice what they'd charge a new customer.
    >>
    >> Do you think it unreasonable to expect them to sell me a T616 for the same
    >> price as a new customer, if I agree to a contract extension? If not, why
    >> not?
    >>
    >> For what it's worth, assuming that the T616 has similar reception to the
    >> T226, I'd be one happy camper with that combo. I'd have working bluetooth
    >> again (which is the biggest issue with the T226; really, it's the *only*
    >> issue I really care about with the T226/T68i thing), and a phone with

    >great
    >> reception. What more would anybody need? C'mon AT&T, make me happy!

    >Throw
    >> this dog a bone. :>)
    >>
    >> --Mike--
    >> Chain Reaction Bicycles
    >> www.ChainReaction.com
    >>

    >Mike, you hit the nail right on the head as far as I am concerned. Yes I am
    >happy that ATT tried to do the right thing and sent me a phone that has
    >better reception. But, as you stated, I'd have to give up some features such
    >as Bluetooth that were a primary reason for going with the T68i in the first
    >place. Other than reception the T68i does everything I need a phone to do.
    >The T616 looks like a great follow on and is probably what I will go with
    >but not until the prices come down a bit.
    >
    >I have been an ATT customer for nearly 9 years now and my contract has often
    >been at the $100 level or above. I don't expect ATT to give me a free phone
    >but it sure would have been nice to get a good discount on the T616 instead
    >of the free T226. I personally think their policy of favoring new customers
    >over long time customers sucks.
    >
    >Cheers
    >TC
    >





  • Phones Discussed Above

    Sony Ericsson T68I More Sony Ericsson T68I topics Sony Ericsson Forum Reviews
    Sony Ericsson T226 More Sony Ericsson T226 topics Sony Ericsson Forum Reviews
  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12