V600 vs. Z600, X-70, V500, etc.

" MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeandré Lennox" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Anwer to the question: The V500/600 and Z600 are the only "clam" phones
> > with BT at the moment.

So is the Panasonic X70 which was available before the Moto V5/600 series.

> However the Motorola MPX220 is on its way and will
> > be a huge improvement on the MPX200 and because it is Windows based,
> > synching will be a breeze. Hope this helps a bit.
>
> Thank you for your reply. (I'll ignore the troll from now on.)

Still sulking little boy?

---

› See More: V600 vs. Z600, X-70, V500, etc.

" MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Jeandré Lennox" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Anwer to the question: The V500/600 and Z600 are the only "clam" phones
> > with BT at the moment.

So is the Panasonic X70 which was available before the Moto V5/600 series.

> However the Motorola MPX220 is on its way and will
> > be a huge improvement on the MPX200 and because it is Windows based,
> > synching will be a breeze. Hope this helps a bit.
>
> Thank you for your reply. (I'll ignore the troll from now on.)

Still sulking little boy?

" MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
>
> Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
only
> in their Bluetooth
> implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including of
> course BT, but everything else as well).
>
> Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
>
>

I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far. I have had no
trouble with BT connecting to my MSI dongle on the desktop, the Dell D600
and my Palm although I have not yet used the phone to dial via the Tungsten.
There is a lot of control using Phone Tools and I can sync my phone book,
back up and transfer rings/pics/vids with this software. Java apps are
installed by 'pushing' them through the BT drivers from the PC.

The camera, while low quality, is surprisingly useful at 640x480. The phone
body of the Moto feels exceedingly well built.

My only other experience is the X70. While it has BT, Panasonic have so far
ignored my friends request for support with BT sync to the PC. Evidently
this is not supported via the software.

Photos from the X70 are very low pixel.

HTH

" MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
>
> Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
only
> in their Bluetooth
> implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including of
> course BT, but everything else as well).
>
> Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
>
>

I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far. I have had no
trouble with BT connecting to my MSI dongle on the desktop, the Dell D600
and my Palm although I have not yet used the phone to dial via the Tungsten.
There is a lot of control using Phone Tools and I can sync my phone book,
back up and transfer rings/pics/vids with this software. Java apps are
installed by 'pushing' them through the BT drivers from the PC.

The camera, while low quality, is surprisingly useful at 640x480. The phone
body of the Moto feels exceedingly well built.

My only other experience is the X70. While it has BT, Panasonic have so far
ignored my friends request for support with BT sync to the PC. Evidently
this is not supported via the software.

Photos from the X70 are very low pixel.

HTH

"[ darkside ]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> " MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> > other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
> >
> > Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
> only
> > in their Bluetooth
> > implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including
of
> > course BT, but everything else as well).
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
> >
> >
>
> I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far.

I have a V600 and am growing to be dissapointed with it, the unit started to
failt to 'give' sms messages to the pc via the lead and MPT, intermittently
the sounder would not alert when txt or calls came in, Orange decided to
replace the unit, so today the courier delivered the handset, now I can get
my sms, but after syncing the BT headset, it was full of audio distortion
both ways and whilst I can pair it with my palm, the unit would not allow
connection for the modem, what I did notice though is the camera is much
better than the returned handset and is actually able to take decent
pictures even at night although from the viewer it brightened the sky ,
Orange have suggested I now contact Motorola which I will do on thursday. it
is much better than the x70 though.

"[ darkside ]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> " MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> > other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
> >
> > Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
> only
> > in their Bluetooth
> > implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including
of
> > course BT, but everything else as well).
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
> >
> >
>
> I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far.

I have a V600 and am growing to be dissapointed with it, the unit started to
failt to 'give' sms messages to the pc via the lead and MPT, intermittently
the sounder would not alert when txt or calls came in, Orange decided to
replace the unit, so today the courier delivered the handset, now I can get
my sms, but after syncing the BT headset, it was full of audio distortion
both ways and whilst I can pair it with my palm, the unit would not allow
connection for the modem, what I did notice though is the camera is much
better than the returned handset and is actually able to take decent
pictures even at night although from the viewer it brightened the sky ,
Orange have suggested I now contact Motorola which I will do on thursday. it
is much better than the x70 though.

Thanks for the reply. I have heard that the V600 will be available soon
through T-Mobile (my carrier), so I might just end up buying one.

"[ darkside ]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> " MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> > other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
> >
> > Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
> only
> > in their Bluetooth
> > implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including
of
> > course BT, but everything else as well).
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
> >
> >
>
> I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far. I have had no
> trouble with BT connecting to my MSI dongle on the desktop, the Dell D600
> and my Palm although I have not yet used the phone to dial via the
Tungsten.
> There is a lot of control using Phone Tools and I can sync my phone book,
> back up and transfer rings/pics/vids with this software. Java apps are
> installed by 'pushing' them through the BT drivers from the PC.
>
> The camera, while low quality, is surprisingly useful at 640x480. The
phone
> body of the Moto feels exceedingly well built.
>
> My only other experience is the X70. While it has BT, Panasonic have so
far
> ignored my friends request for support with BT sync to the PC. Evidently
> this is not supported via the software.
>
> Photos from the X70 are very low pixel.
>
> HTH
>
>

Thanks for the reply. I have heard that the V600 will be available soon
through T-Mobile (my carrier), so I might just end up buying one.

"[ darkside ]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> " MS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Motorola v600 and 500, Sony-Ericsson Z600, Panasonic X-70. Are there any
> > other GSM phones with Bluetooth in a clamshell form factor?
> >
> > Could anyone compare advantages and disadvantages of these phones? Not
> only
> > in their Bluetooth
> > implementation, but in their overall features and qualities (including
of
> > course BT, but everything else as well).
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any feedback. :-)
> >
> >
>
> I have a Moto V600 and am very impressed with it so far. I have had no
> trouble with BT connecting to my MSI dongle on the desktop, the Dell D600
> and my Palm although I have not yet used the phone to dial via the
Tungsten.
> There is a lot of control using Phone Tools and I can sync my phone book,
> back up and transfer rings/pics/vids with this software. Java apps are
> installed by 'pushing' them through the BT drivers from the PC.
>
> The camera, while low quality, is surprisingly useful at 640x480. The
phone
> body of the Moto feels exceedingly well built.
>
> My only other experience is the X70. While it has BT, Panasonic have so
far
> ignored my friends request for support with BT sync to the PC. Evidently
> this is not supported via the software.
>
> Photos from the X70 are very low pixel.
>
> HTH
>
>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 May 2004 13:36:45 +0200,
"Jeandré Lennox" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Anwer to the question: The V500/600 and Z600 are the only "clam" phones
>with BT at the moment. However the Motorola MPX220 is on its way and will
>be a huge improvement on the MPX200 and because it is Windows based,
>synching will be a breeze. Hope this helps a bit.

The Z600 isn't Windows based (thank God), yet syncing is still a breeze.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Wed, 19 May 2004 13:36:45 +0200,
"Jeandré Lennox" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Anwer to the question: The V500/600 and Z600 are the only "clam" phones
>with BT at the moment. However the Motorola MPX220 is on its way and will
>be a huge improvement on the MPX200 and because it is Windows based,
>synching will be a breeze. Hope this helps a bit.

The Z600 isn't Windows based (thank God), yet syncing is still a breeze.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>