Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Mark
    Guest
    here's hoping you guys can help!



    when phonebook numbers are stored in 'domestic' format e.g.
    07715 xxxxxx
    the caller is recognised when they call but NOT when they send a SMS

    when phonebook numbers are stored in 'international' format e.g.
    +447715 xxxxxx
    the caller is recognised when they send a SMS but NOT when they call!

    Apart from storing all mobile numbers in both formats, any suggestions?





    See More: V3 problems (UK)




  2. #2
    Andre
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    Why not just use international format for everything?
    Or enter the international format as a secondary number for each
    entry.


    On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:07:26 +0000 (UTC), "Mark"
    <m@mark_remove_fraser.net> wrote:

    >here's hoping you guys can help!
    >
    >
    >
    >when phonebook numbers are stored in 'domestic' format e.g.
    >07715 xxxxxx
    >the caller is recognised when they call but NOT when they send a SMS
    >
    >when phonebook numbers are stored in 'international' format e.g.
    >+447715 xxxxxx
    >the caller is recognised when they send a SMS but NOT when they call!
    >
    >Apart from storing all mobile numbers in both formats, any suggestions?
    >





  3. #3
    Mark
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    I can't use the international format for everything because it won't
    recognise that for incoming calls. I have stored each mobile number in both
    formats for now but it's a pain having to scroll thru duplicate entries


    "Andre" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Why not just use international format for everything?
    > Or enter the international format as a secondary number for each
    > entry.
    >
    >
    > On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:07:26 +0000 (UTC), "Mark"
    > <m@mark_remove_fraser.net> wrote:
    >
    >>here's hoping you guys can help!
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>when phonebook numbers are stored in 'domestic' format e.g.
    >>07715 xxxxxx
    >>the caller is recognised when they call but NOT when they send a SMS
    >>
    >>when phonebook numbers are stored in 'international' format e.g.
    >>+447715 xxxxxx
    >>the caller is recognised when they send a SMS but NOT when they call!
    >>
    >>Apart from storing all mobile numbers in both formats, any suggestions?
    >>

    >






  4. #4
    JC
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:07:26 +0000 (UTC), "Mark" <m@mark_remove_fraser.net>
    wrote:

    >here's hoping you guys can help!
    >
    >
    >
    >when phonebook numbers are stored in 'domestic' format e.g.
    >07715 xxxxxx
    >the caller is recognised when they call but NOT when they send a SMS
    >
    >when phonebook numbers are stored in 'international' format e.g.
    >+447715 xxxxxx
    >the caller is recognised when they send a SMS but NOT when they call!
    >
    >Apart from storing all mobile numbers in both formats, any suggestions?
    >



    Well, I'm in the UK and have a black V3 and do NOT get the symptoms you are
    reporting.

    I have just done a test with both the normal format 07764 xxxxxx and the
    international format +447764 xxxxxx and in both cases, the correct Name was
    shown on both the call and the SMS!! The only time I do not see the name
    directly is when the call is missed and I get a message "1 call missed - 0
    unknown", but I just then press the "view" button to see the caller
    details.

    Are you sure that this is not a network-specific problem? I am on O2 if
    that helps at all.

    --

    Regards

    John [Essex, UK]
    Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply



  5. #5
    Mark
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    I'm also on o2, and its also the black one, although I am using my work's
    SIM at the moment whilst I am waiting for the number to be transferred to my
    new SIM. I assume there is no connection to that fact? - A new SIM can't
    make any difference to this can it?

    "JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:07:26 +0000 (UTC), "Mark"
    > <m@mark_remove_fraser.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>here's hoping you guys can help!
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>when phonebook numbers are stored in 'domestic' format e.g.
    >>07715 xxxxxx
    >>the caller is recognised when they call but NOT when they send a SMS
    >>
    >>when phonebook numbers are stored in 'international' format e.g.
    >>+447715 xxxxxx
    >>the caller is recognised when they send a SMS but NOT when they call!
    >>
    >>Apart from storing all mobile numbers in both formats, any suggestions?
    >>

    >
    >
    > Well, I'm in the UK and have a black V3 and do NOT get the symptoms you
    > are
    > reporting.
    >
    > I have just done a test with both the normal format 07764 xxxxxx and the
    > international format +447764 xxxxxx and in both cases, the correct Name
    > was
    > shown on both the call and the SMS!! The only time I do not see the name
    > directly is when the call is missed and I get a message "1 call missed - 0
    > unknown", but I just then press the "view" button to see the caller
    > details.
    >
    > Are you sure that this is not a network-specific problem? I am on O2 if
    > that helps at all.
    >
    > --
    >
    > Regards
    >
    > John [Essex, UK]
    > Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply






  6. #6
    JC
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    On Wed, 25 May 2005 07:55:51 +0000 (UTC), "Mark" <m@mark_remove_fraser.net>
    wrote:

    >I'm also on o2, and its also the black one, although I am using my work's
    >SIM at the moment whilst I am waiting for the number to be transferred to my
    >new SIM. I assume there is no connection to that fact? - A new SIM can't
    >make any difference to this can it?

    Are the numbers stored on the SIM or the phone??

    All of my contacts are on the phone and not the SIM.

    Give that try.


    --

    Regards

    John [Essex, UK]
    Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply



  7. #7
    Mark
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    same here!

    what's your flex version? (or anything else sotware related that mey be
    relevent)


    "JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Wed, 25 May 2005 07:55:51 +0000 (UTC), "Mark"
    > <m@mark_remove_fraser.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>I'm also on o2, and its also the black one, although I am using my work's
    >>SIM at the moment whilst I am waiting for the number to be transferred to
    >>my
    >>new SIM. I assume there is no connection to that fact? - A new SIM can't
    >>make any difference to this can it?

    > Are the numbers stored on the SIM or the phone??
    >
    > All of my contacts are on the phone and not the SIM.
    >
    > Give that try.
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    > Regards
    >
    > John [Essex, UK]
    > Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply






  8. #8
    Mark
    Guest

    Re: V3 problems (UK)

    swapped for a new phone today and it's got different software which seems to
    have fixed the problem


    "Mark" <m@mark_remove_fraser.net> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > same here!
    >
    > what's your flex version? (or anything else sotware related that mey be
    > relevent)
    >
    >
    > "JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> On Wed, 25 May 2005 07:55:51 +0000 (UTC), "Mark"
    >> <m@mark_remove_fraser.net>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>I'm also on o2, and its also the black one, although I am using my
    >>>work's
    >>>SIM at the moment whilst I am waiting for the number to be transferred to
    >>>my
    >>>new SIM. I assume there is no connection to that fact? - A new SIM can't
    >>>make any difference to this can it?

    >> Are the numbers stored on the SIM or the phone??
    >>
    >> All of my contacts are on the phone and not the SIM.
    >>
    >> Give that try.
    >>
    >>
    >> --
    >>
    >> Regards
    >>
    >> John [Essex, UK]
    >> Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply

    >
    >






  • Similar Threads