Hey, will wonders never cease! I tried it (with 3 pauses) and it works like
a charm.
Thanks.
In article <JB7If.12095$Ou1.3692@tornado.socal.rr.com>, "BruceR" <razrbruce AT
gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes(!), good idea, in that case it would work. You can use a Pause or a
>Wait and then the digits would be dialed using DTMF. It would work if
>you did a separate entry for each individual. You could do it for the
>whole company if you added the zero for operator. Each Pause is 2
>seconds. Wait stops till you press a button to continue. Add them by
>pressing Menu when dialing the number to be stored.
>
>
>"Just Me" <local_vintage@REMOVETHIShotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:rN6If.5732$UD1.1216@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
>> In article <Es5If.6826$Z3.601@tornado.socal.rr.com>, "BruceR"
>> <razrbruce AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Not unless the voice dialing is a function of your office's auto
>>>attendant system. Voice dialing in the phone is useless as it is not
>>>used to send DTMF tones.
>>
>>
>> I feared as much. What if one inserted a pause or multiple pauses
>> after the
>> main number after estimating how long it takes for the offic system to
>> answer.
>> Do you think that the handset would send out DTMF after the pauses if
>> the
>> call were answered?
>>
>
>