Results 11 to 15 of 15
- 06-20-2007, 10:00 AM #11XS11EGuest
Re: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
Randall Ainsworth <rag@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article <Xns9954DC57ADCACxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173.184>,
> XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote:
>
>> I said useless to me because the price includes a HUGE amount of
>> stuff I don't want and very little that I do want. The iPhone
>> has already been reported as a very mediocre phone and that's ALL
>> I want, no tunes, no camera, no web, no texting. I want to call
>> people and have people call me and nothing else so why would I
>> pay hundreds for features I'll not use? It's useless to me....
>
> I haven't seen any reviews saying it's a good phone or a bad
> one...it's not out there yet.
Apparently it is, I read a report elsewhere. Google might find it for
you.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
› See More: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
- 06-20-2007, 12:15 PM #12XS11EGuest
Re: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
Pegleg <Pegleg@usnavyret.mil> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:00:43 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Apparently it is, I read a report elsewhere. Google might find it
>>for you.
>
> Will not be available until 29 June.
Apparently it's available to testers as there are reports on it
already.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
- 06-20-2007, 11:30 PM #13SteveGuest
Re: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
In article <Xns9955729C2FFD0xs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173.184>,
XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Pegleg <Pegleg@usnavyret.mil> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:00:43 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Apparently it is, I read a report elsewhere. Google might find it
> >>for you.
> >
> > Will not be available until 29 June.
>
> Apparently it's available to testers as there are reports on it
> already.
That's like saying that unreleased beta software, that is buggy will
eventually be released like that. I'll say that the iphone tested last
month is better than the iphone tested the month before that, and until
it is released on June 29th, there is no accurate report of how it will
be on the 29th.
Just a few days ago, Apple replaced the plastic with optical quality
glass, and increased the battery life from 5 to 8 hours.
Those are just some improvements we've been told about. We don't know
what kind of tweaks they've made to make the phone better, but you've
already made up your mind to go by the older reviews.
- 06-21-2007, 08:32 AM #14XS11EGuest
Re: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
Steve <Steve@IHATESPAM.com> wrote:
> but you've already made up your mind to go by the older reviews.
No, I made up my mind as soon as I saw the announcement. It's not a
phone I'd have any use for, any phone that does anything other than
make or receive calls is a phone I don't need/want.
Please read posts before replying next time, OK?
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
- 06-22-2007, 09:58 PM #15SteveGuest
Re: Old Motorola StarTAC - phones are for calling people, for taking pictures use a digital camera
In article <Xns99564CA515A2xs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173.184>,
XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote:
> Steve <Steve@IHATESPAM.com> wrote:
>
> > but you've already made up your mind to go by the older reviews.
>
> No, I made up my mind as soon as I saw the announcement. It's not a
> phone I'd have any use for, any phone that does anything other than
> make or receive calls is a phone I don't need/want.
>
> Please read posts before replying next time, OK?
Now you're just being a jerk. You know what you said. I responded to
you saying that you read reviews that the iphone as a phone was not so
good. I responded by saying the phone is not out yet. You responded
that you read reviews from people who already tested the phone. I
responded by saying they are reviewing a beta and not a finished
product, but you made up your mind already that the phone sucks.
You took my above statement "but you've already made up your mind to go
by the older reviews" out of context. That was in response to you
saying the phone had terrible performance based on the older reviews you
read.
You don't want the phone, don't get it. It's OK for you not to want it.
It clearly is not for everybody, but I'm attacking your statements that
the phones performance sucks.
How about you read my posts, and yours, before replying next time, OK?

Run taker
Today, 02:51 AM in Sports