Razr V3 Motorola Phone Tools

The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now>
>>wrote in <qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>The attached picture ...
>>
>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to
>>being rude, it means your post won't make it to the many
>>newservers that filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead,
>>put your image on a free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put
>>the URL in your Usenet post.
>
> Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make
> a crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of
> their users.

No, rude because it's a violation of Usnet etiquitte or Netiquitte.
Never post any attachment to a newsgroup that doesn't have the word
"binaries" in it's title.

> Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers
> worth looking at.

Any proper server will strip attachments.

> Rude...? Your rude for putting your nose where it doesn't belong.
> And bring nothing useful to the conversation.

He properly pointed out the rules to you, you need to learn about
newsgroups and netiquitte.

Start here, it's a good primer:

http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/dont.html



--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org

---

› See More: Razr V3 Motorola Phone Tools

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:26:08 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:

>The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
>> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now>
>>>wrote in <qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>>The attached picture ...
>>>
>>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to
>>>being rude, it means your post won't make it to the many
>>>newservers that filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead,
>>>put your image on a free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put
>>>the URL in your Usenet post.
>>
>> Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make
>> a crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of
>> their users.
>
>No, rude because it's a violation of Usnet etiquitte or Netiquitte.
>Never post any attachment to a newsgroup that doesn't have the word
>"binaries" in it's title.
>
>> Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers
>> worth looking at.
>
>Any proper server will strip attachments.
>
>> Rude...? Your rude for putting your nose where it doesn't belong.
>> And bring nothing useful to the conversation.
>
>He properly pointed out the rules to you, you need to learn about
>newsgroups and netiquitte.
>
>Start here, it's a good primer:
>
>http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/dont.html

Again nothing useful added...

I came here with a question. I found out all I needed to know.

I won't be checking back here unless I have something else I want to
find out...

I have a little concern for someone who hangs out in a cell phone
group. And who send a reply so fast, even a useless one...

There's a good chance you need to stop trying to police a cell phone
news group. Where all you get is laughed at.
And maybe get outside now and then...

Feel free to have the last word. As I said I won't be checking back...
-- --

The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote in
>><qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>The attached picture ...
>>
>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to being
>>rude, it means your post won't make it to the many newservers that
>>filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead, put your image on a
>>free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put the URL in your Usenet
>>post.
>
>Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make a
>crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of their
>users.
>
>Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers worth
>looking at.
>

Usenet newby apparently.

-mhd

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:38:39 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote in
<t4cbr3d0v6h8k4gpdado7jtso6r3k63ogo@4ax.com>:

>On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:26:08 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
>wrote:

>>He properly pointed out the rules to you, you need to learn about
>>newsgroups and netiquitte.
>>
>>Start here, it's a good primer:
>>
>>http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/dont.html
>
>Again nothing useful added...
>
>I came here with a question. I found out all I needed to know.
>
>I won't be checking back here unless I have something else I want to
>find out...
>
>I have a little concern for someone who hangs out in a cell phone
>group. And who send a reply so fast, even a useless one...
>
>There's a good chance you need to stop trying to police a cell phone
>news group. Where all you get is laughed at.
>And maybe get outside now and then...
>
>Feel free to have the last word. As I said I won't be checking back...

Watch out the door doesn't smack you in the tush on the way out!

--
Best regards, MOTOROLA WIKI:
John Navas <http://cell.wikia.com/wiki/Motorola>

The Dr. wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:26:08 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
>>><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now>
>>>>wrote in <qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>The attached picture ...
>>>>
>>>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to
>>>>being rude, it means your post won't make it to the many
>>>>newservers that filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead,
>>>>put your image on a free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put
>>>>the URL in your Usenet post.
>>>
>>>Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make
>>>a crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of
>>>their users.
>>
>>No, rude because it's a violation of Usnet etiquitte or Netiquitte.
>>Never post any attachment to a newsgroup that doesn't have the word
>>"binaries" in it's title.
>>
>>
>>>Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers
>>>worth looking at.
>>
>>Any proper server will strip attachments.
>>
>>
>>>Rude...? Your rude for putting your nose where it doesn't belong.
>>>And bring nothing useful to the conversation.
>>
>>He properly pointed out the rules to you, you need to learn about
>>newsgroups and netiquitte.
>>
>>Start here, it's a good primer:
>>
>>http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/dont.html
>
>
> Again nothing useful added...
>
> I came here with a question. I found out all I needed to know.
>
> I won't be checking back here unless I have something else I want to
> find out...
>
> I have a little concern for someone who hangs out in a cell phone
> group. And who send a reply so fast, even a useless one...
>
> There's a good chance you need to stop trying to police a cell phone
> news group. Where all you get is laughed at.
> And maybe get outside now and then...
>
> Feel free to have the last word. As I said I won't be checking back...
> -- --

Good bye. We won't miss you!

In article <3d7br3t0pqreig2alnklntaknvbpq2iihr@4ax.com>, The Dr.
<The_Dr@home.now> wrote:

> Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make a
> crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of their
> users.

I wouldn't call it "rude," but then, Navas is an idiot.

Bottom line: you can't post images in non-binary newsgroups.

[posted and mailed]

The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:

> Again nothing useful added...

Yes, there was useful content, I gave you some links so you could
learn what you did wrong.

> I came here with a question. I found out all I needed to know.
>
> I won't be checking back here unless I have something else I want
> to find out...

Good luck finding anyone else who will help you after you've acted
like a total jerk.

> I have a little concern for someone who hangs out in a cell phone
> group. And who send a reply so fast, even a useless one...

It was useless only to your closed mind.

> There's a good chance you need to stop trying to police a cell
> phone news group. Where all you get is laughed at.
> And maybe get outside now and then...

Do you have any idea how ignorant you appear? People were trying to
help and you come back with your idiotic attitude and post
completely off the wall lunatic ravings.

I doubt you'll learn, though.

Ignorant is not knowing, stupid is refusing to learn and guess which
group you fall into?




--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org

He's the ****ing picture police....... Nothing better to do, sad...



On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:18:04 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:

>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote in
>><qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>
>>>The attached picture ...
>>
>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to being
>>rude, it means your post won't make it to the many newservers that
>>filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead, put your image on a
>>free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put the URL in your Usenet
>>post.
>
>Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make a
>crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of their
>users.
>
>Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers worth
>looking at.
>
>And how willingly motorola did it for them.
>Like I said before. Any whore will swallow if the price is right...
>
>Rude...? Your rude for putting your nose where it doesn't belong. And
>bring nothing useful to the conversation.
>
>Try to keep from doing that in the feature...
>-- --

On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:03:31 -0600, Jim <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>He's the ****ing picture police....... Nothing better to do, sad...

If you want to police ****ing pictures, the alt.sex.* hierarchy is over
there ------>

From what I gathered of this thread the picture was of a mobile phone, no
****ing going on here. However, as my ISP operates a well-configured
server and this group doesn't fall somewhere in *.binaries.* I didn't see
it.

>On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:18:04 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:09:38 GMT, John Navas
>><spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:02:36 -0600, The Dr. <The_Dr@home.now> wrote in
>>><qjl8r317pmbv0qiv6si5m53v3tvhop1d5d@4ax.com>:
>>>
>>>>The attached picture ...
>>>
>>>Please do *not* attach pictures to Usenet posts. In addition to being
>>>rude, it means your post won't make it to the many newservers that
>>>filter out binaries in text newsgroups. Instead, put your image on a
>>>free hosting site (e.g., tinypic.com), and put the URL in your Usenet
>>>post.
>>
>>Rude...? Simply showing how verizon has requested motorola make a
>>crippled phone so then can try to suck a few more bucks out of their
>>users.
>>
>>Won't make it to some servers? It will make it to any servers worth
>>looking at.
>>
>>And how willingly motorola did it for them.
>>Like I said before. Any whore will swallow if the price is right...
>>
>>Rude...? Your rude for putting your nose where it doesn't belong. And
>>bring nothing useful to the conversation.
>>
>>Try to keep from doing that in the feature...
>>-- --
>


--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell Eridani Star System
MailStripper - http://www.MailStripper.eu/ - SMTP spam filter
Second Number - http://secondnumber.matrixnetwork.co.uk/

On Feb 8, 7:22*pm, Sandy Foster <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <88opq3tl98dsadgsj2pjfcbmuo8nvmr...@4ax.com>,
> *The Dr. <The...@home.now> wrote:
>
> > Every time I see anyone ask this same question I see them get sent to
> >www.howardforums.com. *Never have seen anyone come back and say
> > "thanks, that worked great"...
>
> Okay, let me be the first. <G> I did go to howardforums, found where to
> buy some "uncrippling" software, followed the directions and now have
> many of the advertised capabilities of my Razr V3m back where they
> belong -- with me. I bought a CD from cellcables.com -- worked like a
> charm. HTH.
>
> --
> Sandy
> sw.foster 1 (at) gmail (dot) com (remove/change the obvious)http://www.sandymike.net

I just got the Razr V3m a few days ago. I checked out cellcables.com
and ended up sending them an Email regarding the compatability with
Vista. It works with Vista but it seems Verizon put some new software
on the Razr and cellcables.com doesn't have the software set up for
Verizon's new version. Customer support (which was very responsive)
said to check back in a couple of weeks and they would have the new
software listed.

I'm curious, how hard is cellcables.com's software to use. Is it like
a regular program or what? One thing their site doesn't do is show
screen shots.