Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    NiceGuyTJ
    Guest
    Dateline: 1998

    As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division officers,
    Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his hand
    was a handgun.

    Later, after all officers were cleared of the charges, the survivors of Marvin
    Ammons filed a federal lawsuit in Omaha against the Omaha Police Division.
    During the proceedings of this lawsuit, Ammons family attorneys forced then
    Interim Omaha Police Chief Charlie Circo to release tape recordings in the
    police's possession of Ammons and his cell phone calls.

    Later still, the Douglas County, Nebraska judiciary announced that no requests
    were ever made by the Omaha Police Division for wiretap permission nor had any
    Douglas County, Nebraska judge ever issued any wiretap order, EVER. This was
    printed in the Omaha World Herald with a Douglas County judge making the
    statement.

    Douglas County is the legal entity presiding over the city of Omaha, Nebraska.

    Yet, the Omaha Police Division claimed the stop of the vehicle driven by Marvin
    Ammons was a routine traffic stop. The man had broken no laws, and they
    murdered him for having a cell phone in his hand.

    The federal judge presiding over the case denied Ammon's family attorneys the
    option of presenting the wiretapped recordings in court and the lawsuit was
    dropped.

    Later still, the nephew of Marvin Ammons was arrested in another so called
    routine traffic stop where the OPD discovered a handgun and quantity of
    marijuana. Apparently, the police, who had been conducting illegal wiretap
    surveillance on the Ammons family had confused the voice of Marvin Ammons with
    that of his nephew and were on their guns ready to kill when they stopped the
    vehicle of Marvin Ammons prior to his nephew's arrest.

    The entire episode is being covered up to this day. Not a finger was lifted by
    the cellular service providers in the Omaha, Nebraska area, including Sprint
    PCS, to protect their customers from surveillance by the police or other
    criminal eavesdroppers, nor was any effort by the FCC or any other federal
    agency to bring the police and their informants to justice.

    And you want me to buy a cellular telephone?



    See More: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone




  2. #2
    JP's E-Mail
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    How would they "protect" their customers from being tapped? Do you have a
    Landline phone? Whats the difference in tapping a landline and a cellphone?
    Or are you cut off from the world? How about their ability to monitor your
    emails and other activities??????

    I'm not saying that the actions of the officers were right at the time of
    the stop, but get real about the phone tapping. Find something else to *****
    about.

    "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Dateline: 1998
    >
    > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    officers,
    > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    hand
    > was a handgun.
    >
    > Later, after all officers were cleared of the charges, the survivors of

    Marvin
    > Ammons filed a federal lawsuit in Omaha against the Omaha Police Division.
    > During the proceedings of this lawsuit, Ammons family attorneys forced

    then
    > Interim Omaha Police Chief Charlie Circo to release tape recordings in the
    > police's possession of Ammons and his cell phone calls.
    >
    > Later still, the Douglas County, Nebraska judiciary announced that no

    requests
    > were ever made by the Omaha Police Division for wiretap permission nor had

    any
    > Douglas County, Nebraska judge ever issued any wiretap order, EVER. This

    was
    > printed in the Omaha World Herald with a Douglas County judge making the
    > statement.
    >
    > Douglas County is the legal entity presiding over the city of Omaha,

    Nebraska.
    >
    > Yet, the Omaha Police Division claimed the stop of the vehicle driven by

    Marvin
    > Ammons was a routine traffic stop. The man had broken no laws, and they
    > murdered him for having a cell phone in his hand.
    >
    > The federal judge presiding over the case denied Ammon's family attorneys

    the
    > option of presenting the wiretapped recordings in court and the lawsuit

    was
    > dropped.
    >
    > Later still, the nephew of Marvin Ammons was arrested in another so called
    > routine traffic stop where the OPD discovered a handgun and quantity of
    > marijuana. Apparently, the police, who had been conducting illegal wiretap
    > surveillance on the Ammons family had confused the voice of Marvin Ammons

    with
    > that of his nephew and were on their guns ready to kill when they stopped

    the
    > vehicle of Marvin Ammons prior to his nephew's arrest.
    >
    > The entire episode is being covered up to this day. Not a finger was

    lifted by
    > the cellular service providers in the Omaha, Nebraska area, including

    Sprint
    > PCS, to protect their customers from surveillance by the police or other
    > criminal eavesdroppers, nor was any effort by the FCC or any other federal
    > agency to bring the police and their informants to justice.
    >
    > And you want me to buy a cellular telephone?






  3. #3
    JP's E-Mail
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    How would they "protect" their customers from being tapped? Do you have a
    Landline phone? Whats the difference in tapping a landline and a cellphone?
    Or are you cut off from the world? How about their ability to monitor your
    emails and other activities??????

    I'm not saying that the actions of the officers were right at the time of
    the stop, but get real about the phone tapping. Find something else to *****
    about.

    "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Dateline: 1998
    >
    > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    officers,
    > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    hand
    > was a handgun.
    >
    > Later, after all officers were cleared of the charges, the survivors of

    Marvin
    > Ammons filed a federal lawsuit in Omaha against the Omaha Police Division.
    > During the proceedings of this lawsuit, Ammons family attorneys forced

    then
    > Interim Omaha Police Chief Charlie Circo to release tape recordings in the
    > police's possession of Ammons and his cell phone calls.
    >
    > Later still, the Douglas County, Nebraska judiciary announced that no

    requests
    > were ever made by the Omaha Police Division for wiretap permission nor had

    any
    > Douglas County, Nebraska judge ever issued any wiretap order, EVER. This

    was
    > printed in the Omaha World Herald with a Douglas County judge making the
    > statement.
    >
    > Douglas County is the legal entity presiding over the city of Omaha,

    Nebraska.
    >
    > Yet, the Omaha Police Division claimed the stop of the vehicle driven by

    Marvin
    > Ammons was a routine traffic stop. The man had broken no laws, and they
    > murdered him for having a cell phone in his hand.
    >
    > The federal judge presiding over the case denied Ammon's family attorneys

    the
    > option of presenting the wiretapped recordings in court and the lawsuit

    was
    > dropped.
    >
    > Later still, the nephew of Marvin Ammons was arrested in another so called
    > routine traffic stop where the OPD discovered a handgun and quantity of
    > marijuana. Apparently, the police, who had been conducting illegal wiretap
    > surveillance on the Ammons family had confused the voice of Marvin Ammons

    with
    > that of his nephew and were on their guns ready to kill when they stopped

    the
    > vehicle of Marvin Ammons prior to his nephew's arrest.
    >
    > The entire episode is being covered up to this day. Not a finger was

    lifted by
    > the cellular service providers in the Omaha, Nebraska area, including

    Sprint
    > PCS, to protect their customers from surveillance by the police or other
    > criminal eavesdroppers, nor was any effort by the FCC or any other federal
    > agency to bring the police and their informants to justice.
    >
    > And you want me to buy a cellular telephone?






  4. #4
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:27:34 -0600, "JP's E-Mail"
    <[email protected]> posted in alt.cellular.motorola:

    >How would they "protect" their customers from being tapped? Do you have a
    >Landline phone? Whats the difference in tapping a landline and a cellphone?


    Nothing - they both require court orders.

    >Or are you cut off from the world? How about their ability to monitor your
    >emails and other activities??????


    Same court order. Without it some celco employee violated both the
    law and his employer's policy.
    --
    Al - rukbat at optonline dot net



  5. #5
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 02:27:34 -0600, "JP's E-Mail"
    <[email protected]> posted in alt.cellular.motorola:

    >How would they "protect" their customers from being tapped? Do you have a
    >Landline phone? Whats the difference in tapping a landline and a cellphone?


    Nothing - they both require court orders.

    >Or are you cut off from the world? How about their ability to monitor your
    >emails and other activities??????


    Same court order. Without it some celco employee violated both the
    law and his employer's policy.
    --
    Al - rukbat at optonline dot net



  6. #6
    R. Mark Clayton
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone


    "JP's E-Mail" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > I'm not saying that the actions of the officers were right at the time of
    > the stop, but get real about the phone tapping. Find something else to

    *****
    > about.
    >
    > "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > Dateline: 1998
    > >
    > > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    > officers,
    > > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by

    Omaha
    > > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    > hand
    > > was a handgun.
    > >

    snip - long story

    > >
    > > And you want me to buy a cellular telephone?

    >
    >


    Well in the UK you can get shot for having a chair leg in a carrier bag, or
    even lying in bed at home naked (James Ashley).





  7. #7
    R. Mark Clayton
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone


    "JP's E-Mail" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > I'm not saying that the actions of the officers were right at the time of
    > the stop, but get real about the phone tapping. Find something else to

    *****
    > about.
    >
    > "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > Dateline: 1998
    > >
    > > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    > officers,
    > > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by

    Omaha
    > > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    > hand
    > > was a handgun.
    > >

    snip - long story

    > >
    > > And you want me to buy a cellular telephone?

    >
    >


    Well in the UK you can get shot for having a chair leg in a carrier bag, or
    even lying in bed at home naked (James Ashley).





  8. #8
    TroiaHussein
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    If you don't believe what has been said on this post, check out the archives of
    the Omaha World Herald.

    The details are in the article reporting on the progess of the Ammon's family's
    lawsuit.

    Marvin Ammon's cell phone killed him in more ways than one.



  9. #9
    TroiaHussein
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    If you don't believe what has been said on this post, check out the archives of
    the Omaha World Herald.

    The details are in the article reporting on the progess of the Ammon's family's
    lawsuit.

    Marvin Ammon's cell phone killed him in more ways than one.



  10. #10
    DexAZ
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone


    "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Dateline: 1998
    >
    > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    officers,
    > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    hand
    > was a handgun.
    >


    Was he asked/ordered by the officers to exit the vehicle? Or did he
    suddenly jump out in order to give the officers a piece of his mind? Common
    sense tells you NOT to get out of your car during a police stop _until_ you
    are asked/ordered to by the officers. If you exit a car with ANYTHING in
    your hands during a traffic stop is simply begging for trouble.

    DexAZ





  11. #11
    DexAZ
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone


    "NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Dateline: 1998
    >
    > As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    officers,
    > Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    > Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    hand
    > was a handgun.
    >


    Was he asked/ordered by the officers to exit the vehicle? Or did he
    suddenly jump out in order to give the officers a piece of his mind? Common
    sense tells you NOT to get out of your car during a police stop _until_ you
    are asked/ordered to by the officers. If you exit a car with ANYTHING in
    your hands during a traffic stop is simply begging for trouble.

    DexAZ





  12. #12
    Name withheld by request
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    He jumped out of the car (after a lengthy slow speed chase in which
    the vehicle crossed the center line several times), yelled something
    at one of the approaching officers, pointed something black at one
    of the other officers (who ducked), and was fired upon by the other
    officer. I've seen the FULL video from BOTH patrol car in dash
    cameras, and I would have shot him too.



    On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:02:00 GMT, "DexAZ" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> Dateline: 1998
    >>
    >> As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    >officers,
    >> Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    >> Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    >hand
    >> was a handgun.
    >>

    >
    >Was he asked/ordered by the officers to exit the vehicle? Or did he
    >suddenly jump out in order to give the officers a piece of his mind? Common
    >sense tells you NOT to get out of your car during a police stop _until_ you
    >are asked/ordered to by the officers. If you exit a car with ANYTHING in
    >your hands during a traffic stop is simply begging for trouble.
    >
    >DexAZ
    >





  13. #13
    Name withheld by request
    Guest

    Re: Man Killed By Police In Omaha, Nebraska For Possessing Cell Phone

    He jumped out of the car (after a lengthy slow speed chase in which
    the vehicle crossed the center line several times), yelled something
    at one of the approaching officers, pointed something black at one
    of the other officers (who ducked), and was fired upon by the other
    officer. I've seen the FULL video from BOTH patrol car in dash
    cameras, and I would have shot him too.



    On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:02:00 GMT, "DexAZ" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >
    >"NiceGuyTJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> Dateline: 1998
    >>
    >> As he exited his vehicle after being stopped by Omaha Police Division

    >officers,
    >> Omaha native and Gulf War veteran Marvin Ammons was shot to death by Omaha
    >> Police Division officers who claimed they believed the cell phone in his

    >hand
    >> was a handgun.
    >>

    >
    >Was he asked/ordered by the officers to exit the vehicle? Or did he
    >suddenly jump out in order to give the officers a piece of his mind? Common
    >sense tells you NOT to get out of your car during a police stop _until_ you
    >are asked/ordered to by the officers. If you exit a car with ANYTHING in
    >your hands during a traffic stop is simply begging for trouble.
    >
    >DexAZ
    >





  • Similar Threads