If the replacement didn't work properly, GO BACK
and get another one. Keep repeating until you get a good one.
Or, go to another location. Be sure you stress that this replacement
is within X time frame and NOT to charge you the $35.
(BTW: some of the replacement phones are new or undistinguishable from new)
You got a bad one, deal with it...

You are paying a monthly bill for SERVICE. The phone is just an
access tool.

"NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
> "Larry" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:Fv5pd.6385$T02.2615@lakeread06...
>> Quit whining!!
>
>
> Only a fool would be happy with a replacement phone that does not work
> properly as well.
>
> Gee, you must be a stock holder in one of these companies and or you work
> for them.
>
> Your post have now been block from my mail viewer. To bad.
>
> Have a nice life, however impossible that might seem to you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > YES, I did. Now three times over.
>> >
>> > The warranty/contract held between Motorola and Nextel is not privy to
> the
>> > Nextel customer. As you might know, Motorola does not sell to the
> public,
>> > period.
>> >
>> > Yes, there are such laws under the consumer protection act of 1986.
>> However,
>> > they are very long and lengthy to read, but in simple:
>> >
>> > The Enactment of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was one of the most
>> important
>> > steps taken. The present position of the implementation of this Act is
> as
>> > follows:
>> >
>> >
>> > (1) All the provisions of the Act came into force w.e.f. 1.7.1987.
>> >
>> > (2) The State level consumer protection councils are functioning in all
>> > States/ UTs.
>> >
>> >
>> > Possibly you should read up first before making such an assumption.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Best wishes for a nice thanksgiving.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Al Klein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news[email protected]...
>> > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:20:57 GMT, "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]>
>> > > said in alt.cellular.nextel:
>> > >
>> > > >(((Can someone help me with: A consumer law/statute that protects the
>> > > >consumer in the event a brand-new product becomes unfixable within
> the
>> > first
>> > > >90 the days from the date of purchase that in turn a retailer must
>> > replace
>> > > >the item with an equally brand new one?)))
>> > >
>> > > No such law - especially in view of the fact that it's publicly stated
>> > > that your unworking (used, not new) phone may be replaced with a used,
>> > > factory refurbished phone.
>> > >
>> > > BTW, Nextel is not the only carrier that does this - they ALL do.
>> > >
>> > > >Nonetheless, sending a used replacement phone without telling the
>> > customer
>> > > >that you had done just that is deceptive and can be seen as fraud
>> within
>> > > >itself.
>> > >
>> > > Did you read your contract? ALL of it?
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>




› See More: WARNING - Whiner!!