Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Richard Ness
    Guest
    Conspicuous silence from our whiner speaks volumes.



    I guess it was "shut up"....




    "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    >
    > Since your posts are devoid of any FACTS, who actually knows what got your panties in such a twist.
    >
    > Your Bull **** is becoming tiring.... Prove me wrong. Post the FACTS.
    >
    > ANY facts.
    >
    > Put up or shut up.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "MOTOROLA USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    >> Man you sure missed the boat on what and why my case was referred to the
    >> FBI. Either you're not getting all of my posts, or you're to lazy to
    >> actually read them in there entirety, and at speed in which you can not only
    >> (fully) comprehend what is being said, but (retain) what you have read. You
    >> may want to try www.usenet.com rather then using your Outlook Express to
    >> peruse newsgroups in finding (all) of my post.
    >>
    >> And yes, FRAUD is taken very seriously by law local law enforcement, just
    >> that this case became a federal one because of the operation crossing state
    >> lines. I don't call the shots; I just do as I am told to do. This shows just
    >> how little you actually know and understand when national law enforcement
    >> comes into play, verses state/local law enforcement issues. Example: If you
    >> commit a crime using the postal service, (known as, mail fraud) it's a
    >> federal crime, as the postal service crosses state lines, thus making it,
    >> "A Federal Crime." Not to mention using government buildings to commit the
    >> crime.
    >>
    >> You might want to scratch your ole noggin a little bit longer next time
    >> before you respond, aside from the fact that responding when were all
    >> frazzled up clouds our judgment.
    >>
    >> For god's sakes, I moved on with the old warranty issue, can't you catch up
    >> with the current issue? Please let it go. Please. Otherwise I will have to
    >> ignore your ranting, of which I should have done in the first place, but did
    >> not, in the name of keeping this post on track.
    >>
    >> Please contribute to the cause in a constructive way, or at least hold your
    >> tongue until you have all of the facts straight. Again I say, stay away from
    >> jury duty when and (if) possible.
    >>
    >> Thanks in advance.
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    >






    See More: Conspicuous silence....




  2. #2
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: Conspicuous silence....

    On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:32:29 -0800, "Richard Ness"
    <[email protected]> said in alt.cellular.nextel:

    >Conspicuous silence from our whiner speaks volumes.


    >I guess it was "shut up"....


    He *did* say Monday. (He just didn't say *which* Monday.)



  3. #3
    DevilsPGD
    Guest

    Re: Conspicuous silence....

    In message <[email protected]> Al Klein
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >He *did* say Monday. (He just didn't say *which* Monday.)


    True enough. Maybe another Monday or two?


    --
    In Jolt We Trust



  • Similar Threads