For the last f**king time, moron.

>>Justin Green wrote:
>> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>>
>>
>>You're right- I'm in a conspiracy with Verizon and Verizon Wireless to
>>spread lies about Verizon. Verizon lies about it, Verizon Wireless lies
>>about it, and I lie about it. I just wonder how big the **** stain is
>>that you're sitting in.
>>
>>I've told you why they don't file- that crack pipe in your right hand is
>>playing havoc with your memory.
>
>
> No you didn't. Your explanation was simply WRONG.
>

I know- I've been wrong about everything (so is Verizon, obviously)

>
>
>
>>And to really jog your memory, I
>>originally was pointing out that VZ Wireless was not a 'private
>>comapny', but was in fact owned (in part) by Verizon.
>
>
> It is owned in part by VZ. But it is private. Besides being a dumbass
> working at McDonalds, that's the reason you can't go to a broker and buy an
> interest in Cellco. You agree that Cellco doesn't have shares outstanding,
> or shares at all for that matter, right?
>

You have me confused with your smarter brother- he's the one in your
family who qualifed for the McDonalds job. Put your keyboard away and
go to bed- Mommy says you need your beauty sleep. You can't buy AOL
stock anymore either- it is now AOL/Time Warner as a result of their
merger. Is AOL a private Company? The AOL corporate entities still do
business. Your logic sucks- just admit defeat and give up.
>
>>I believe that
>>has been done with information from both entities. You can ask for all
>>of the clarification you want. I would suggest you do some research at
>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>
>
> Again, explain why the partnership agreement is "wrong" according to you.
>

I never said the partnership agreement was wrong- it is quite solid, as
a matter of fact. You are just trying to read things into it that not
only are wrong, but don't make any sense. Parent corporations can make
a business deal using any of the business entities it has at its
disposal. You really need to brush up on these things- this is Business
101 stuff.

---

› See More: For the last f**king time, moron.

I would suggest you do some research at
> the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> need to brush up on the state of affairs.


I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up, too,
as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.

Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several entities
listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
And they ARE separate entities.

Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not have
LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is a
separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.

Are you really this stupid in real life?

I would suggest you do some research at
> the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> need to brush up on the state of affairs.


I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up, too,
as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.

Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several entities
listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
And they ARE separate entities.

Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not have
LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is a
separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.

Are you really this stupid in real life?

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:6%[email protected]...
>
> >>Justin Green wrote:
> >> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>
> >>You're right- I'm in a conspiracy with Verizon and Verizon Wireless to
> >>spread lies about Verizon. Verizon lies about it, Verizon Wireless lies
> >>about it, and I lie about it. I just wonder how big the **** stain is
> >>that you're sitting in.
> >>
> >>I've told you why they don't file- that crack pipe in your right hand is
> >>playing havoc with your memory.
> >
> >
> > No you didn't. Your explanation was simply WRONG.
> >
>
> I know- I've been wrong about everything (so is Verizon, obviously)
>

Why yes, thanks for finally admitting you're wrong.

> >
> >
> >>And to really jog your memory, I
> >>originally was pointing out that VZ Wireless was not a 'private
> >>comapny', but was in fact owned (in part) by Verizon.
> >
> >
> > It is owned in part by VZ. But it is private. Besides being a dumbass
> > working at McDonalds, that's the reason you can't go to a broker and buy
an
> > interest in Cellco. You agree that Cellco doesn't have shares
outstanding,
> > or shares at all for that matter, right?
> >
>
> You have me confused with your smarter brother- he's the one in your
> family who qualifed for the McDonalds job. Put your keyboard away and
> go to bed- Mommy says you need your beauty sleep. You can't buy AOL
> stock anymore either- it is now AOL/Time Warner as a result of their
> merger. Is AOL a private Company? The AOL corporate entities still do
> business. Your logic sucks- just admit defeat and give up.

No one in my family is as dumb as you. Not even Spot, the family dog.
Nah, you're wrong. Please tell me why you can't buy stock in Cellco. Both
reasons. There are two.

> >>I believe that
> >>has been done with information from both entities. You can ask for all
> >>of the clarification you want. I would suggest you do some research at
> >>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >
> >
> > Again, explain why the partnership agreement is "wrong" according to
you.
> >
>
> I never said the partnership agreement was wrong- it is quite solid, as
> a matter of fact. You are just trying to read things into it that not
> only are wrong, but don't make any sense. Parent corporations can make
> a business deal using any of the business entities it has at its
> disposal. You really need to brush up on these things- this is Business
> 101 stuff.

So I'm reading into the agreement that it is owned by several PRIVATE
companies?

Oh my God you are stupid.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:6%[email protected]...
>
> >>Justin Green wrote:
> >> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>
> >>You're right- I'm in a conspiracy with Verizon and Verizon Wireless to
> >>spread lies about Verizon. Verizon lies about it, Verizon Wireless lies
> >>about it, and I lie about it. I just wonder how big the **** stain is
> >>that you're sitting in.
> >>
> >>I've told you why they don't file- that crack pipe in your right hand is
> >>playing havoc with your memory.
> >
> >
> > No you didn't. Your explanation was simply WRONG.
> >
>
> I know- I've been wrong about everything (so is Verizon, obviously)
>

Why yes, thanks for finally admitting you're wrong.

> >
> >
> >>And to really jog your memory, I
> >>originally was pointing out that VZ Wireless was not a 'private
> >>comapny', but was in fact owned (in part) by Verizon.
> >
> >
> > It is owned in part by VZ. But it is private. Besides being a dumbass
> > working at McDonalds, that's the reason you can't go to a broker and buy
an
> > interest in Cellco. You agree that Cellco doesn't have shares
outstanding,
> > or shares at all for that matter, right?
> >
>
> You have me confused with your smarter brother- he's the one in your
> family who qualifed for the McDonalds job. Put your keyboard away and
> go to bed- Mommy says you need your beauty sleep. You can't buy AOL
> stock anymore either- it is now AOL/Time Warner as a result of their
> merger. Is AOL a private Company? The AOL corporate entities still do
> business. Your logic sucks- just admit defeat and give up.

No one in my family is as dumb as you. Not even Spot, the family dog.
Nah, you're wrong. Please tell me why you can't buy stock in Cellco. Both
reasons. There are two.

> >>I believe that
> >>has been done with information from both entities. You can ask for all
> >>of the clarification you want. I would suggest you do some research at
> >>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >
> >
> > Again, explain why the partnership agreement is "wrong" according to
you.
> >
>
> I never said the partnership agreement was wrong- it is quite solid, as
> a matter of fact. You are just trying to read things into it that not
> only are wrong, but don't make any sense. Parent corporations can make
> a business deal using any of the business entities it has at its
> disposal. You really need to brush up on these things- this is Business
> 101 stuff.

So I'm reading into the agreement that it is owned by several PRIVATE
companies?

Oh my God you are stupid.

Justin Green wrote:
> I would suggest you do some research at
>
>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>
>
>
> I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up, too,
> as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
> Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
>
> Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several entities
> listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
> And they ARE separate entities.
>
> Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not have
> LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is a
> separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
>
> Are you really this stupid in real life?
>
>
No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.

My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.

Parent Companies
A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
www.vodafone.com

Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:

http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf

Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.

If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.

Justin Green wrote:
> I would suggest you do some research at
>
>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>
>
>
> I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up, too,
> as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
> Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
>
> Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several entities
> listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
> And they ARE separate entities.
>
> Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not have
> LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is a
> separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
>
> Are you really this stupid in real life?
>
>
No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.

My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.

Parent Companies
A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
www.vodafone.com

Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:

http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf

Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.

If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> > I would suggest you do some research at
> >
> >>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
too,
> > as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
> > Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
> >
> > Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
entities
> > listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
> > And they ARE separate entities.
> >
> > Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
have
> > LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
a
> > separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
> >
> > Are you really this stupid in real life?
> >
> >
> No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
> a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
>
> My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
>
> Parent Companies
> A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
> world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
> are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
> United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
> million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
> long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
> long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
> publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
> With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
> Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
> Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
> Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
> proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
> and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
> www.vodafone.com
>
> Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
> company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
> Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
> mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
>
>
http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
>
> Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
> clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
>
> If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
> all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.


Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
absolutely a crack smoking moron.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> > I would suggest you do some research at
> >
> >>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
too,
> > as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
> > Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
> >
> > Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
entities
> > listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
> > And they ARE separate entities.
> >
> > Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
have
> > LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
a
> > separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
> >
> > Are you really this stupid in real life?
> >
> >
> No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
> a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
>
> My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
>
> Parent Companies
> A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
> world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
> are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
> United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
> million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
> long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
> long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
> publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
> With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
> Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
> Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
> Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
> proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
> and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
> www.vodafone.com
>
> Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
> company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
> Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
> mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
>
>
http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
>
> Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
> clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
>
> If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
> all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.


Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
absolutely a crack smoking moron.

Justin Green wrote:
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Justin Green wrote:
>>
>>> I would suggest you do some research at
>>>
>>>
>>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
>
> too,
>
>>>as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
>>>Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
>>>
>>>Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
>
> entities
>
>>>listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
>>>And they ARE separate entities.
>>>
>>>Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
>
> have
>
>>>LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
>
> a
>
>>>separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
>>>
>>>Are you really this stupid in real life?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
>>a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
>>
>>My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
>>
>> Parent Companies
>>A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
>>world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
>>are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
>>United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
>>million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
>>long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
>>long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
>>publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
>>With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
>>Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
>>Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
>>Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
>>proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
>>and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
>>www.vodafone.com
>>
>>Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
>>company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
>>Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
>>mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
>>
>>
>
> http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
>
>>Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
>>clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
>>
>>If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
>>all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.
>
>
>
> Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
> absolutely a crack smoking moron.
>
>
OK- R e a l s l o w t h i s t i m e :

1. Click the link to the press kit I provided (its the blue thingy).
Lucky for you, this won't require typing with both hands- I'd hate to
interrupt your 'private moment'.
2. Read the press kit or any one of the many sources I have referenced
by hyperlink, not because "I said so" (I would recommend having Mommy
read it to you if the words are too big)
3. Take up your concerns with the corporate liars- I only repeat their
information.

And do me one more favor- come to the table with some facts next time.
Your questions are meaningless, and if you were correct, you'd be able
to give twenty verifiable sources for every one I've provided (and I can
provide more if need be).

Now go rest up- I hear your favorite episode of Teletubbies is on in the
morning, but you'll have to miss your morning nap.

Justin Green wrote:
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Justin Green wrote:
>>
>>> I would suggest you do some research at
>>>
>>>
>>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
>
> too,
>
>>>as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities, including
>>>Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
>>>
>>>Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
>
> entities
>
>>>listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC reports.
>>>And they ARE separate entities.
>>>
>>>Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
>
> have
>
>>>LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
>
> a
>
>>>separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
>>>
>>>Are you really this stupid in real life?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
>>a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
>>
>>My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
>>
>> Parent Companies
>>A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
>>world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
>>are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
>>United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
>>million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
>>long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
>>long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
>>publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
>>With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
>>Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
>>Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
>>Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
>>proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
>>and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
>>www.vodafone.com
>>
>>Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
>>company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
>>Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
>>mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
>>
>>
>
> http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
>
>>Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
>>clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
>>
>>If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
>>all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.
>
>
>
> Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
> absolutely a crack smoking moron.
>
>
OK- R e a l s l o w t h i s t i m e :

1. Click the link to the press kit I provided (its the blue thingy).
Lucky for you, this won't require typing with both hands- I'd hate to
interrupt your 'private moment'.
2. Read the press kit or any one of the many sources I have referenced
by hyperlink, not because "I said so" (I would recommend having Mommy
read it to you if the words are too big)
3. Take up your concerns with the corporate liars- I only repeat their
information.

And do me one more favor- come to the table with some facts next time.
Your questions are meaningless, and if you were correct, you'd be able
to give twenty verifiable sources for every one I've provided (and I can
provide more if need be).

Now go rest up- I hear your favorite episode of Teletubbies is on in the
morning, but you'll have to miss your morning nap.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>Justin Green wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would suggest you do some research at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
> >
> > too,
> >
> >>>as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities,
including
> >>>Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
> >>>
> >>>Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
> >
> > entities
> >
> >>>listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC
reports.
> >>>And they ARE separate entities.
> >>>
> >>>Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
> >
> > have
> >
> >>>LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
> >
> > a
> >
> >>>separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
> >>>
> >>>Are you really this stupid in real life?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
> >>a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
> >>
> >>My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
> >>
> >> Parent Companies
> >>A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
> >>world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
> >>are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
> >>United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
> >>million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
> >>long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
> >>long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
> >>publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
> >>With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
> >>Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
> >>Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
> >>Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
> >>proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
> >>and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
> >>www.vodafone.com
> >>
> >>Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
> >>company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
> >>Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
> >>mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
> >
> >>Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
> >>clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
> >>
> >>If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
> >>all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.
> >
> >
> >
> > Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
> > absolutely a crack smoking moron.
> >
> >
> OK- R e a l s l o w t h i s t i m e :
>
> 1. Click the link to the press kit I provided (its the blue thingy).
> Lucky for you, this won't require typing with both hands- I'd hate to
> interrupt your 'private moment'.
> 2. Read the press kit or any one of the many sources I have referenced
> by hyperlink, not because "I said so" (I would recommend having Mommy
> read it to you if the words are too big)
> 3. Take up your concerns with the corporate liars- I only repeat their
> information.
>
> And do me one more favor- come to the table with some facts next time.

I did. You refuse to read the sources.

> Your questions are meaningless, and if you were correct, you'd be able
> to give twenty verifiable sources for every one I've provided (and I can
> provide more if need be).

My questions are meaningless to you, because you're too stupid to answer
them.

> Now go rest up- I hear your favorite episode of Teletubbies is on in the
> morning, but you'll have to miss your morning nap.

Try answering the questions.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>Justin Green wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would suggest you do some research at
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
> >>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I guess Cellco Partnership's lawyers and accountants need to brush up,
> >
> > too,
> >
> >>>as they still think that Cellco is owned by severeal entities,
including
> >>>Bell Atlantic Cellular Holdings.
> >>>
> >>>Or, you could actually explain the reason that there are several
> >
> > entities
> >
> >>>listed on the amended partnership agreement that don't file SEC
reports.
> >>>And they ARE separate entities.
> >>>
> >>>Divisions, in the strict sense of the word, like you use it, does not
> >
> > have
> >
> >>>LLC, LP, or Inc., behind their names. When they do, rest assured it is
> >
> > a
> >
> >>>separate entity, which COULD BE owned by another entity.
> >>>
> >>>Are you really this stupid in real life?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>No- I tried 'dumbing down' to help you understand, but I obviously have
> >>a few more steps down to take to accomplish this.
> >>
> >>My final quote from Verizon Wireless, taken directly from their website.
> >>
> >> Parent Companies
> >>A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) is one of the
> >>world's leading providers of communications services. Verizon companies
> >>are the largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the
> >>United States, with 136.6 million access line equivalents and 33.3
> >>million Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest
> >>long-distance carrier for U.S. consumers, with 13.2 million
> >>long-distance lines, and the company is also the largest directory
> >>publisher in the world, as measured by directory titles and circulation.
> >>With more than $67 billion in annual revenues and 227,000 employees,
> >>Verizon's global presence extends to the Americas, Europe, Asia and the
> >>Pacific. For more information on Verizon, visit www.verizon.com.
> >>Vodafone is the world's largest mobile operator with over 112.5m
> >>proportionate customers worldwide and equity interests in 28 countries
> >>and Partner Networks in a further 7 countries.
> >>www.vodafone.com
> >>
> >>Your beef is not with me, it is with your beloved '(not) private
> >>company'. They are misinforming everybody about their relationship with
> >>Verizon. If you reaaly want to get an explanation form the horse'
> >>mouth, check out page 5 of the Press Kit on Verizon Wireless' site:
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
http://www.verizonwireless.com/pdfs/...skit7-1-03.pdf
> >
> >>Read the portions from February to June 30, 2000. It outlines quite
> >>clearly how the merger swallowed up all of the partnership entities.
> >>
> >>If you have any further concerns, you better contact VZ Wireless- after
> >>all, I am only provideing what they have said. THey must be lying.
> >
> >
> >
> > Again, answer the ****ing questions. You can't. Why? Because you are
> > absolutely a crack smoking moron.
> >
> >
> OK- R e a l s l o w t h i s t i m e :
>
> 1. Click the link to the press kit I provided (its the blue thingy).
> Lucky for you, this won't require typing with both hands- I'd hate to
> interrupt your 'private moment'.
> 2. Read the press kit or any one of the many sources I have referenced
> by hyperlink, not because "I said so" (I would recommend having Mommy
> read it to you if the words are too big)
> 3. Take up your concerns with the corporate liars- I only repeat their
> information.
>
> And do me one more favor- come to the table with some facts next time.

I did. You refuse to read the sources.

> Your questions are meaningless, and if you were correct, you'd be able
> to give twenty verifiable sources for every one I've provided (and I can
> provide more if need be).

My questions are meaningless to you, because you're too stupid to answer
them.

> Now go rest up- I hear your favorite episode of Teletubbies is on in the
> morning, but you'll have to miss your morning nap.

Try answering the questions.

Justin Green wrote:
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:6%[email protected]...
>
>>>>Justin Green wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You're right- I'm in a conspiracy with Verizon and Verizon Wireless to
>>>>spread lies about Verizon. Verizon lies about it, Verizon Wireless lies
>>>>about it, and I lie about it. I just wonder how big the **** stain is
>>>>that you're sitting in.
>>>>
>>>>I've told you why they don't file- that crack pipe in your right hand is
>>>>playing havoc with your memory.
>>>
>>>
>>>No you didn't. Your explanation was simply WRONG.
>>>
>>
>>I know- I've been wrong about everything (so is Verizon, obviously)
>>
>
>
> Why yes, thanks for finally admitting you're wrong.
>
>
>>>
>>>>And to really jog your memory, I
>>>>originally was pointing out that VZ Wireless was not a 'private
>>>>comapny', but was in fact owned (in part) by Verizon.
>>>
>>>
>>>It is owned in part by VZ. But it is private. Besides being a dumbass
>>>working at McDonalds, that's the reason you can't go to a broker and buy
>
> an
>
>>>interest in Cellco. You agree that Cellco doesn't have shares
>
> outstanding,
>
>>>or shares at all for that matter, right?
>>>
>>
>>You have me confused with your smarter brother- he's the one in your
>>family who qualifed for the McDonalds job. Put your keyboard away and
>>go to bed- Mommy says you need your beauty sleep. You can't buy AOL
>>stock anymore either- it is now AOL/Time Warner as a result of their
>>merger. Is AOL a private Company? The AOL corporate entities still do
>>business. Your logic sucks- just admit defeat and give up.
>
>
> No one in my family is as dumb as you. Not even Spot, the family dog.
> Nah, you're wrong. Please tell me why you can't buy stock in Cellco. Both
> reasons. There are two.
>
>
>>>>I believe that
>>>>has been done with information from both entities. You can ask for all
>>>>of the clarification you want. I would suggest you do some research at
>>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>Again, explain why the partnership agreement is "wrong" according to
>
> you.
>
>>I never said the partnership agreement was wrong- it is quite solid, as
>>a matter of fact. You are just trying to read things into it that not
>>only are wrong, but don't make any sense. Parent corporations can make
>>a business deal using any of the business entities it has at its
>>disposal. You really need to brush up on these things- this is Business
>>101 stuff.
>
>
> So I'm reading into the agreement that it is owned by several PRIVATE
> companies?
>
> Oh my God you are stupid.
>
>
>
>
Who said they were companies?

Justin Green wrote:
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:6%[email protected]...
>
>>>>Justin Green wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You're right- I'm in a conspiracy with Verizon and Verizon Wireless to
>>>>spread lies about Verizon. Verizon lies about it, Verizon Wireless lies
>>>>about it, and I lie about it. I just wonder how big the **** stain is
>>>>that you're sitting in.
>>>>
>>>>I've told you why they don't file- that crack pipe in your right hand is
>>>>playing havoc with your memory.
>>>
>>>
>>>No you didn't. Your explanation was simply WRONG.
>>>
>>
>>I know- I've been wrong about everything (so is Verizon, obviously)
>>
>
>
> Why yes, thanks for finally admitting you're wrong.
>
>
>>>
>>>>And to really jog your memory, I
>>>>originally was pointing out that VZ Wireless was not a 'private
>>>>comapny', but was in fact owned (in part) by Verizon.
>>>
>>>
>>>It is owned in part by VZ. But it is private. Besides being a dumbass
>>>working at McDonalds, that's the reason you can't go to a broker and buy
>
> an
>
>>>interest in Cellco. You agree that Cellco doesn't have shares
>
> outstanding,
>
>>>or shares at all for that matter, right?
>>>
>>
>>You have me confused with your smarter brother- he's the one in your
>>family who qualifed for the McDonalds job. Put your keyboard away and
>>go to bed- Mommy says you need your beauty sleep. You can't buy AOL
>>stock anymore either- it is now AOL/Time Warner as a result of their
>>merger. Is AOL a private Company? The AOL corporate entities still do
>>business. Your logic sucks- just admit defeat and give up.
>
>
> No one in my family is as dumb as you. Not even Spot, the family dog.
> Nah, you're wrong. Please tell me why you can't buy stock in Cellco. Both
> reasons. There are two.
>
>
>>>>I believe that
>>>>has been done with information from both entities. You can ask for all
>>>>of the clarification you want. I would suggest you do some research at
>>>>the SEC website you are so fond of directing others to. You obviously
>>>>need to brush up on the state of affairs.
>>>
>>>
>>>Again, explain why the partnership agreement is "wrong" according to
>
> you.
>
>>I never said the partnership agreement was wrong- it is quite solid, as
>>a matter of fact. You are just trying to read things into it that not
>>only are wrong, but don't make any sense. Parent corporations can make
>>a business deal using any of the business entities it has at its
>>disposal. You really need to brush up on these things- this is Business
>>101 stuff.
>
>
> So I'm reading into the agreement that it is owned by several PRIVATE
> companies?
>
> Oh my God you are stupid.
>
>
>
>
Who said they were companies?