For the last f**king time, moron.

> Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
> made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
> from you.


Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.

Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:

WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
(ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...

See? They are STILL separate legal entities.

---

› See More: For the last f**king time, moron.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
They can do it as a corporate division just as AOL can enter into
agreements as AOL, when infact it is a division of AOL/Time Warner.

Take a look at the following news article written by CNN, written just
last week:

http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/04/tech...stor/lamonica/

I call your attention to the 12th paragraph:

"So which carriers are at the most risk? Mike Hodel, an analyst with
Morningstar, said that companies that are doing a good job of holding
onto customers, firms like Nextel (NXTL: up $0.60 to $19.54, Research,
Estimates) and Verizon Wireless (which is co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon
(VZ: up $0.54 to $36.79, Research, Estimates) and British telecom
Vodafone) will probably see the lowest increase in customer churn."

Does that say co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon? Of course, they don't know
what the hell they are talking about either, do they? You are the
almighty, all-seeing stupid piece of crap who can not see the writing on
the wall. IT IS OWNED BY VERIZON THROUGH ITS BUSINESS DIVISIONS. All
of your pissing, moaning, whining and complaining may be obnoxious and
quite voracious, but the fact is that it is your logic that is flawed,
and according to the very article I just quoted, YOU ARE THE FREAKIN'
MORON.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
They can do it as a corporate division just as AOL can enter into
agreements as AOL, when infact it is a division of AOL/Time Warner.

Take a look at the following news article written by CNN, written just
last week:

http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/04/tech...stor/lamonica/

I call your attention to the 12th paragraph:

"So which carriers are at the most risk? Mike Hodel, an analyst with
Morningstar, said that companies that are doing a good job of holding
onto customers, firms like Nextel (NXTL: up $0.60 to $19.54, Research,
Estimates) and Verizon Wireless (which is co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon
(VZ: up $0.54 to $36.79, Research, Estimates) and British telecom
Vodafone) will probably see the lowest increase in customer churn."

Does that say co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon? Of course, they don't know
what the hell they are talking about either, do they? You are the
almighty, all-seeing stupid piece of crap who can not see the writing on
the wall. IT IS OWNED BY VERIZON THROUGH ITS BUSINESS DIVISIONS. All
of your pissing, moaning, whining and complaining may be obnoxious and
quite voracious, but the fact is that it is your logic that is flawed,
and according to the very article I just quoted, YOU ARE THE FREAKIN'
MORON.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm

the 6th paragraph:

" Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."


Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm

the 6th paragraph:

" Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."


Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.

This apparently didn't post the first time. My comments below.


Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>

They can do it as a corporate division just as AOL can enter into
agreements as AOL, when infact it is a division of AOL/Time Warner.

Take a look at the following news article written by CNN, written just
last week:

http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/04/tech...stor/lamonica/

I call your attention to the 12th paragraph:

"So which carriers are at the most risk? Mike Hodel, an analyst with
Morningstar, said that companies that are doing a good job of holding
onto customers, firms like Nextel (NXTL: up $0.60 to $19.54, Research,
Estimates) and Verizon Wireless (which is co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon
(VZ: up $0.54 to $36.79, Research, Estimates) and British telecom
Vodafone) will probably see the lowest increase in customer churn."

Does that say co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon? Of course, they don't know
what the hell they are talking about either, do they? You are the
almighty, all-seeing stupid piece of crap who can not see the writing on
the wall. IT IS OWNED BY VERIZON THROUGH ITS BUSINESS DIVISIONS. All
of your pissing, moaning, whining and complaining may be obnoxious and
quite voracious, but the fact is that it is your logic that is flawed,
and according to the very article I just quoted, YOU ARE THE FREAKIN' MORON.

This apparently didn't post the first time. My comments below.


Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>

They can do it as a corporate division just as AOL can enter into
agreements as AOL, when infact it is a division of AOL/Time Warner.

Take a look at the following news article written by CNN, written just
last week:

http://money.cnn.com/2003/09/04/tech...stor/lamonica/

I call your attention to the 12th paragraph:

"So which carriers are at the most risk? Mike Hodel, an analyst with
Morningstar, said that companies that are doing a good job of holding
onto customers, firms like Nextel (NXTL: up $0.60 to $19.54, Research,
Estimates) and Verizon Wireless (which is co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon
(VZ: up $0.54 to $36.79, Research, Estimates) and British telecom
Vodafone) will probably see the lowest increase in customer churn."

Does that say co-owned by Baby Bell Verizon? Of course, they don't know
what the hell they are talking about either, do they? You are the
almighty, all-seeing stupid piece of crap who can not see the writing on
the wall. IT IS OWNED BY VERIZON THROUGH ITS BUSINESS DIVISIONS. All
of your pissing, moaning, whining and complaining may be obnoxious and
quite voracious, but the fact is that it is your logic that is flawed,
and according to the very article I just quoted, YOU ARE THE FREAKIN' MORON.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
And I plucked this out of a Verizon press release- if its not owned by
Verizon, how can they provide wireless service>

"A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications is one of the world's
leading providers of communications services, with approximately $67
billion in revenues and 221,000 employees. Verizon companies are the
largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the United
States, with 137.6 million access line equivalents and 34.6 million
Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest long-distance
carrier for U.S. consumers, with 14.6 million long-distance lines. The
company is also the largest directory publisher in the world, as
measured by directory titles and circulation. Verizon's international
presence includes wireline and wireless communications operations and
investments, primarily in the Americas and Europe. For more information,
visit www.verizon.com."

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
And I plucked this out of a Verizon press release- if its not owned by
Verizon, how can they provide wireless service>

"A Fortune 10 company, Verizon Communications is one of the world's
leading providers of communications services, with approximately $67
billion in revenues and 221,000 employees. Verizon companies are the
largest providers of wireline and wireless communications in the United
States, with 137.6 million access line equivalents and 34.6 million
Verizon Wireless customers. Verizon is the third largest long-distance
carrier for U.S. consumers, with 14.6 million long-distance lines. The
company is also the largest directory publisher in the world, as
measured by directory titles and circulation. Verizon's international
presence includes wireline and wireless communications operations and
investments, primarily in the Americas and Europe. For more information,
visit www.verizon.com."

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> >>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
> >>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
> >>from you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement
if
> > they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
> >
> > Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
> >
> > WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> > certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
dated
> > as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group
and
> > the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10,
2000,
> > the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> > hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was
merged
> > with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group,
and
> > (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> > Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated,
another
> > member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
> >
> > See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
>
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm
>
> the 6th paragraph:
>
> " Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
> of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."
>
>
> Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.

Yes, you dolt, do you really think that the Dow Jones is going to list
seperately the partners of Cellco? LOOK AT THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

God, it must be nice to be an 8 year old with internet access.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> >>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
> >>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
> >>from you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement
if
> > they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
> >
> > Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
> >
> > WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> > certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
dated
> > as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group
and
> > the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10,
2000,
> > the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> > hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was
merged
> > with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group,
and
> > (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> > Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated,
another
> > member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
> >
> > See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
>
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm
>
> the 6th paragraph:
>
> " Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
> of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."
>
>
> Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.

Yes, you dolt, do you really think that the Dow Jones is going to list
seperately the partners of Cellco? LOOK AT THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

God, it must be nice to be an 8 year old with internet access.

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
This next one is from a Verizon Wireless press release:

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/tools/quo...457FB%7D&symb=

"About Verizon Wireless

Verizon Wireless is the nation's leading provider of wireless
communications. The company has the largest nationwide wireless voice
and data network and 34.6 million customers. Headquartered in
Bedminster, NJ, Verizon Wireless is a joint venture of Verizon
Communications (VZ) and Vodafone (NYSE and LSE: VOD). Find more
information on the Web at www.verizonwireless.com. "

I guess they don't know what thery're talking about either, do they?

Justin Green wrote:
>>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
>>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
>>from you.
>
>
>
> Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement if
> they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
>
> Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
>
> WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement dated
> as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group and
> the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10, 2000,
> the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was merged
> with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group, and
> (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated, another
> member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
>
> See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
>
>
>
>
This next one is from a Verizon Wireless press release:

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/tools/quo...457FB%7D&symb=

"About Verizon Wireless

Verizon Wireless is the nation's leading provider of wireless
communications. The company has the largest nationwide wireless voice
and data network and 34.6 million customers. Headquartered in
Bedminster, NJ, Verizon Wireless is a joint venture of Verizon
Communications (VZ) and Vodafone (NYSE and LSE: VOD). Find more
information on the Web at www.verizonwireless.com. "

I guess they don't know what thery're talking about either, do they?

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> >>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
> >>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
> >>from you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement
if
> > they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
> >
> > Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
> >
> > WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> > certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
dated
> > as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group
and
> > the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10,
2000,
> > the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> > hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was
merged
> > with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group,
and
> > (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> > Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated,
another
> > member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
> >
> > See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
>
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm
>
> the 6th paragraph:
>
> " Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
> of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."
>
>
> Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.


Can't you post anything other than general statements from an article where
the end user doesn't care about the specific companies that own Cellco?

And please, for once in this thread, answer a question. How is it that the
partners of Cellco still exist as of July 24, 2003, yet DO NOT FILE WITH THE
SEC?

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
> >>Yeah, I went there and it offered no proof to counter the statements I
> >>made above. Learn to get the facts- I tire of your rants that come only
> >>from you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please tell me how those entities entered into a partnership agreement
if
> > they were divisions of another company and no longer separate entities.
> >
> > Here's a quote from the Agreement, AS FILED WITH THE SEC:
> >
> > WHEREAS, the undersigned constitute all of the current parties to that
> > certain Cellco Partnership Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement
dated
> > as of April 3, 2000 by and among the members of the Bell Atlantic Group
and
> > the members of the Vodafone Group (as further amended as of July 10,
2000,
> > the "Partnership Agreement"), it being the case that prior to the date
> > hereof (i) AirTouch Paging, then a member of the Vodafone Group, was
merged
> > with and into JV PartnerCo, LLC, another member of the Vodafone Group,
and
> > (ii) GTE Wireless of the South Incorporated, then a member of the Bell
> > Atlantic Group, was merged with and into GTE Wireless Incorporated,
another
> > member of the Bell Atlantic Group; and...
> >
> > See? They are STILL separate legal entities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Another article from Dow Jones, written today.
>
http://money.cnn.com/services/ticker...9_FORTUNE5.htm
>
> the 6th paragraph:
>
> " Verizon Wireless, which has 34.6 million customers, is a joint venture
> of Verizon Communications (VZ) and Vodafone Group PLC (VOD)."
>
>
> Just in case you thought the first article was a typo.


Can't you post anything other than general statements from an article where
the end user doesn't care about the specific companies that own Cellco?

And please, for once in this thread, answer a question. How is it that the
partners of Cellco still exist as of July 24, 2003, yet DO NOT FILE WITH THE
SEC?