Results 16 to 30 of 49
- 10-05-2003, 09:19 AM #16plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Wrong and wrong...
>
<snip>
>
how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
› See More: questions on i90
- 10-05-2003, 09:19 AM #17plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Wrong and wrong...
>
<snip>
>
how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
- 10-05-2003, 10:59 AM #18WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: questions on i90
plaguebeast wrote:
> "Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Wrong and wrong...
>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
> how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
>
>
Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
- 10-05-2003, 10:59 AM #19WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: questions on i90
plaguebeast wrote:
> "Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Wrong and wrong...
>>
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
> how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
>
>
Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
- 10-05-2003, 04:15 PM #20plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
> plaguebeast wrote:
>
> > "Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>Wrong and wrong...
> >>
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> > how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
> >
> >
>
>
> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
> crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
> you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
> crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
>
almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
- 10-05-2003, 04:15 PM #21plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
> plaguebeast wrote:
>
> > "Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>Wrong and wrong...
> >>
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >
> > how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
> >
> >
>
>
> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
> crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
> you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
> crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
>
almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
- 10-05-2003, 06:50 PM #22WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: questions on i90
plaguebeast wrote:
> "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
>
>>plaguebeast wrote:
>>
>>>>Wrong and wrong...
>>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
>>>
>> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
>>crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
>>you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
>>crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
>>
>
>
> almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
>
>
n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
- 10-05-2003, 06:50 PM #23WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: questions on i90
plaguebeast wrote:
> "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
>
>>plaguebeast wrote:
>>
>>>>Wrong and wrong...
>>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
>>>
>> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
>>crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
>>you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
>>crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
>>
>
>
> almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
>
>
n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
- 10-05-2003, 10:03 PM #24DevilsPGDGuest
Re: questions on i90
In message <<[email protected]>>
[email protected] (soops) did ramble:
>What do you mean by that? I tried the sensor options both off and on.
>yet the phone still turns on when I flipped the cover up (with plenty
>of lights) and also when it's total dark. I just don't see the
>different.
The sensor has a bit of a lag, and it might not be bright enough.
Shut the phone off, press and the *0# buttons at the same time, and turn
on the power. You'll get in diagnostic mode, and it should help test to
see if the sensor works at all, and get an idea for what is bright
enough.
--
If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've had twice as much fun as you.
- 10-05-2003, 10:03 PM #25DevilsPGDGuest
Re: questions on i90
In message <<[email protected]>>
[email protected] (soops) did ramble:
>What do you mean by that? I tried the sensor options both off and on.
>yet the phone still turns on when I flipped the cover up (with plenty
>of lights) and also when it's total dark. I just don't see the
>different.
The sensor has a bit of a lag, and it might not be bright enough.
Shut the phone off, press and the *0# buttons at the same time, and turn
on the power. You'll get in diagnostic mode, and it should help test to
see if the sensor works at all, and get an idea for what is bright
enough.
--
If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've had twice as much fun as you.
- 10-05-2003, 11:33 PM #26RichGuest
Re: questions on i90
the 1st wrong was removing the nextel logo, it can't be done, and the 2nd
was the contrasting adjustment with the photosensor, it has nothing to do
with contrast, nothing @ all.
"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:t%2gb.40867$AH4.15792@lakeread06...
> plaguebeast wrote:
> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
> >
> >>plaguebeast wrote:
> >>
>
> >>>>Wrong and wrong...
> >>>>
> >>><snip>
> >>>
> >>>how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
> >>>
> >> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
> >>crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
> >>you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
> >>crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
> >>
> >
> >
> > almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
> >
> >
>
> n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
>
- 10-05-2003, 11:33 PM #27RichGuest
Re: questions on i90
the 1st wrong was removing the nextel logo, it can't be done, and the 2nd
was the contrasting adjustment with the photosensor, it has nothing to do
with contrast, nothing @ all.
"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:t%2gb.40867$AH4.15792@lakeread06...
> plaguebeast wrote:
> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:i5Yfb.40679$AH4.13741@lakeread06...
> >
> >>plaguebeast wrote:
> >>
>
> >>>>Wrong and wrong...
> >>>>
> >>><snip>
> >>>
> >>>how about some good information instead of just saying wrong ?
> >>>
> >> Yeah and how about posting on the BOTTOM and trimming the exess
> >>crap so someone on the OUTSIDE of the thread can tell what the HELL
> >>you are replying to. That post was nothing more than a big mess of
> >>crap with an extremely short ZERO information message at the top.
> >>
> >
> >
> > almost Eggbert without the sense (??) of humor.
> >
> >
>
> n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
>
- 10-06-2003, 12:05 AM #28plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> the 1st wrong was removing the nextel logo, it can't be done, and the 2nd
> was the contrasting adjustment with the photosensor, it has nothing to do
> with contrast, nothing @ all.
> "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
<snip>
> >
> > >
> >
> > n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
> >
>
>
****ing top posters.
- 10-06-2003, 12:05 AM #29plaguebeastGuest
Re: questions on i90
"Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> the 1st wrong was removing the nextel logo, it can't be done, and the 2nd
> was the contrasting adjustment with the photosensor, it has nothing to do
> with contrast, nothing @ all.
> "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
<snip>
> >
> > >
> >
> > n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
> >
>
>
****ing top posters.
- 10-06-2003, 01:25 AM #30G R JenksGuest
Re: questions on i90
"plaguebeast" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Rich" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > the 1st wrong was removing the nextel logo, it can't be done, and the
2nd
> > was the contrasting adjustment with the photosensor, it has nothing to
do
> > with contrast, nothing @ all.
> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> <snip>
>
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > n00bs, can't live with'em, can't kill'em....
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ****ing top posters.
>
>
I like the Top Posters, because you do not have to waste time paging down to
find the end to see an answer.
Similar Threads
- Games
- alt.cellular.ericsson
- alt.cellular.verizon
- General Cell Phone Forum
Recover scammed cryptocurrency
in Samsung