Results 46 to 60 of 66
- 04-15-2004, 02:35 PM #46POD {Ò¿Ó}Guest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
"Peter Hewitt-Dutton" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> You sad bastard.
> I much prefer posts at the top, then you don't have to scroll down to
> read it. Much easier.
> So how can one person be wrong about this? It's what ever each
> individual person prefers.
You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
you bend light!
Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!
Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote
3.1 User Guidelines
3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
include the entire original!
So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
having the nerve to stick your nose in.
--
*..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*
› See More: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
- 04-15-2004, 03:01 PM #47Ewan VilliersGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
Who Gives a monkeys?
"Kurt Hamster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC), Bill Newton used
> <[email protected]> to say...
>
> >
> >"Dave Plowman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
> >> Try counting the numbers of top against bottom posts on this or any
> >other
> >> UK group. Bottom posting is the norm - and by a factor of several.
> >
> >The implication here is that 'you' have counted them ............You
> >must be a pretty sad guy.
> >
> >Know what I mean? ........;-)))
>
> One doesn't need to count when the overwhelming majority correctly
> bottom post.
>
Who Gives a monkeys?
- 04-15-2004, 03:53 PM #48Gymmy BobGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
It's whan you whole body shakes to your words...LOL
"J. A. Mc." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:42:50 -0400, "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]>
found
> these unused words floating about:
>
> >You don't have to studder if you get excited.
> >
> I've heard of shudder and stutter ... is 'studder' something studdents do?
>
- 04-15-2004, 03:54 PM #49Gymmy BobGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
LOL
<see original attached below>
"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> > Try counting the numbers of top against bottom posts on this or any
other
> > UK group. Bottom posting is the norm - and by a factor of several.
> >
>
> Don't say that, they'll go on a crazy top posting rampage just to out
number
> the bottom (proper) posts just to prove you wrong.
>
> A. Because it messes up the reading order
> Q. Why shouldn't people top post?
>
> A. Top Posting
> Q. Whats the most annoying thing on usenet?
>
>
- 04-15-2004, 03:56 PM #50Gymmy BobGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
That's not what the site I read on it says.
Quote your opinionated site.
Oh I forgot. You can't read this.
"POD {Ò¿Ó}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Peter Hewitt-Dutton" <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
> > You sad bastard.
> > I much prefer posts at the top, then you don't have to scroll down to
> > read it. Much easier.
> > So how can one person be wrong about this? It's what ever each
> > individual person prefers.
>
> You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
> you bend light!
>
> Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
> to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!
>
> Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
> Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote
>
> 3.1 User Guidelines
> 3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
> If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
> summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
> include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
> make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
> Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
> from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
> before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
> include the entire original!
>
>
> So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
> arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
> having the nerve to stick your nose in.
>
> --
> *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
> ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
> ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
> -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*
- 04-15-2004, 04:10 PM #51PhilGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
"Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> That's not what the site I read on it says.
>
> Quote your opinionated site.
>
> Oh I forgot. You can't read this.
FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
thread?
The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
posting.
- 04-15-2004, 04:24 PM #52maveGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
In article <[email protected]>, POD {Ò¿Ó}
<[email protected]> wrote:
> You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
> you bend light!
LMFAO!!!!
--
mave
----------------------------------------------------
drugs... rock 'n' roll... bad-ass vegas whores...
late-night booty calls... shiny disco balls...
.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
- 04-15-2004, 06:12 PM #53Gymmy BobGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they are
something special?
<original rant attached below>
"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > That's not what the site I read on it says.
> >
> > Quote your opinionated site.
> >
> > Oh I forgot. You can't read this.
>
> FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
> thread?
>
> The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
> posting.
>
>
- 04-15-2004, 06:18 PM #54Kurt HamsterGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:01:24 GMT, Ewan Villiers used
<[email protected]> to say...
>Who Gives a monkeys?
Obviously you do or you wouldn't have bothered reading it then making
the effort to reply.
Do you think the village idiot is concerned that you are after her job?
- 04-15-2004, 06:20 PM #55Kurt HamsterGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:56:07 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
<[email protected]> to say...
>
>"POD {Ò¿Ó}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
>> to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!
>>
>> Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
>> Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote
>>
>> 3.1 User Guidelines
>> 3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
>> If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
>> summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
>> include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
>> make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
>> Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
>> from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
>> before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
>> include the entire original!
>>
>>
>> So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
>> arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
>> having the nerve to stick your nose in.
>That's not what the site I read on it says.
>
>Quote your opinionated site.
>
>Oh I forgot. You can't read this.
Yet another own goal by a newbie ****wit.
RFCs are documents, not sites. They may appear on a site, but they
aren't sites as such.
Obviously you weren't reading the correct document.
So why doesn't that surprise me.
- 04-15-2004, 06:24 PM #56Kurt HamsterGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:12:27 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
<[email protected]> to say...
>"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
>> thread?
>>
>> The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
>> posting.
>
>Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
>crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they are
>something special?
>
><original rant attached below>
Because you dumb ****, you are supposed to snip non relative parts of
the message you are replying to.
It's lazy ****wits like you who just bung a few words on top of the
original thread that waste bandwidth.
Sooner or later you will experience a not so subtle LART if you keep on
with this brain dead attitude.
****ing newbies, it's almost as bad as the AOL "me too" of the dim and
distant past.
- 04-15-2004, 08:09 PM #57Gymmy BobGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
What?
"Kurt Hamster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:12:27 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
> <[email protected]> to say...
>
>
> >"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:[email protected]...
> >> FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
> >> thread?
> >>
> >> The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and
top
> >> posting.
> >
> >Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
> >crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they
are
> >something special?
> >
> ><original rant attached below>
>
>
> Because you dum
- 04-15-2004, 11:28 PM #58RobertGuest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
Arguing about a newsgroup post is like running in the special olympics.
Even is you win you're still retarded.
- 04-16-2004, 03:31 AM #59POD {Ò¿Ó}Guest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
Kurt Hamster <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> it's almost as bad as the AOL "me too" of the dim and
> distant past.
>
Not so dim and distant, there were several hundred "me toos" to the 2004
warez list thread.
--
*..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*
- 04-16-2004, 03:32 AM #60POD {Ò¿Ó}Guest
Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam
"Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> What?
Only goes to compound the fact that you are a fecless dimwit with no
****ing clue.
--
*..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*
Similar Threads
- Computers
- Computers
- Computers
Creditare Eficientă
in Chit Chat