Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 66
  1. #46
    POD {Ò¿Ó}
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    "Peter Hewitt-Dutton" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > You sad bastard.
    > I much prefer posts at the top, then you don't have to scroll down to
    > read it. Much easier.
    > So how can one person be wrong about this? It's what ever each
    > individual person prefers.


    You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
    you bend light!

    Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
    to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!

    Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
    Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote

    3.1 User Guidelines
    3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
    If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
    summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
    include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
    make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
    Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
    from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
    before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
    include the entire original!


    So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
    arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
    having the nerve to stick your nose in.

    --
    *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
    -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*



    See More: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam




  2. #47
    Ewan Villiers
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    Who Gives a monkeys?

    "Kurt Hamster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:56:29 +0000 (UTC), Bill Newton used
    > <[email protected]> to say...
    >
    > >
    > >"Dave Plowman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >
    > >> Try counting the numbers of top against bottom posts on this or any

    > >other
    > >> UK group. Bottom posting is the norm - and by a factor of several.

    > >
    > >The implication here is that 'you' have counted them ............You
    > >must be a pretty sad guy.
    > >
    > >Know what I mean? ........;-)))

    >
    > One doesn't need to count when the overwhelming majority correctly
    > bottom post.
    >


    Who Gives a monkeys?





  3. #48
    Gymmy Bob
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    It's whan you whole body shakes to your words...LOL

    "J. A. Mc." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:42:50 -0400, "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]>

    found
    > these unused words floating about:
    >
    > >You don't have to studder if you get excited.
    > >

    > I've heard of shudder and stutter ... is 'studder' something studdents do?
    >






  4. #49
    Gymmy Bob
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    LOL

    <see original attached below>

    "Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > > Try counting the numbers of top against bottom posts on this or any

    other
    > > UK group. Bottom posting is the norm - and by a factor of several.
    > >

    >
    > Don't say that, they'll go on a crazy top posting rampage just to out

    number
    > the bottom (proper) posts just to prove you wrong.
    >
    > A. Because it messes up the reading order
    > Q. Why shouldn't people top post?
    >
    > A. Top Posting
    > Q. Whats the most annoying thing on usenet?
    >
    >






  5. #50
    Gymmy Bob
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    That's not what the site I read on it says.

    Quote your opinionated site.

    Oh I forgot. You can't read this.

    "POD {Ò¿Ó}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > "Peter Hewitt-Dutton" <[email protected]> wrote in
    > news:[email protected]:
    >
    > > You sad bastard.
    > > I much prefer posts at the top, then you don't have to scroll down to
    > > read it. Much easier.
    > > So how can one person be wrong about this? It's what ever each
    > > individual person prefers.

    >
    > You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
    > you bend light!
    >
    > Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
    > to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!
    >
    > Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
    > Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote
    >
    > 3.1 User Guidelines
    > 3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
    > If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
    > summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
    > include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
    > make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
    > Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
    > from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
    > before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
    > include the entire original!
    >
    >
    > So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
    > arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
    > having the nerve to stick your nose in.
    >
    > --
    > *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    > ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    > ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
    > -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*






  6. #51
    Phil
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam


    "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > That's not what the site I read on it says.
    >
    > Quote your opinionated site.
    >
    > Oh I forgot. You can't read this.


    FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
    thread?

    The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
    posting.





  7. #52
    mave
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    In article <[email protected]>, POD {Ò¿Ó}
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    > You're a dense little ****tard ain't you sonny? So dense, in fact, that
    > you bend light!


    LMFAO!!!!

    --
    mave
    ----------------------------------------------------
    drugs... rock 'n' roll... bad-ass vegas whores...
    late-night booty calls... shiny disco balls...



    .................................................................
    Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
    >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<

    -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-




  8. #53
    Gymmy Bob
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
    crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they are
    something special?

    <original rant attached below>

    "Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > That's not what the site I read on it says.
    > >
    > > Quote your opinionated site.
    > >
    > > Oh I forgot. You can't read this.

    >
    > FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
    > thread?
    >
    > The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
    > posting.
    >
    >






  9. #54
    Kurt Hamster
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:01:24 GMT, Ewan Villiers used
    <[email protected]> to say...

    >Who Gives a monkeys?


    Obviously you do or you wouldn't have bothered reading it then making
    the effort to reply.

    Do you think the village idiot is concerned that you are after her job?





  10. #55
    Kurt Hamster
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:56:07 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
    <[email protected]> to say...


    >
    >"POD {Ò¿Ó}" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> Your newbie arrogance is outstanding and comical, just because you like
    >> to do it makes it alright does it? Jeez the logic overpowers me!
    >>
    >> Let me point you in the direction of RFC1855, which is easily found on
    >> Google, so even a moron like you has no excuse....and from whick I quote
    >>
    >> 3.1 User Guidelines
    >> 3.1.1 General Guidelines for mailing lists and NetNews
    >> If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
    >> summarize the original ==>***"at the top"***<== of the message, or
    >> include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will
    >> make sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
    >> Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the postings
    >> from one host to another, it is possible to see a response to a message
    >> before seeing the original. Giving context helps everyone. But do not
    >> include the entire original!
    >>
    >>
    >> So go take your newbie BTInternet/Outlook Express stupidity and
    >> arrogance elsewhere, as you have be found to be clueless on what you are
    >> having the nerve to stick your nose in.


    >That's not what the site I read on it says.
    >
    >Quote your opinionated site.
    >
    >Oh I forgot. You can't read this.


    Yet another own goal by a newbie ****wit.

    RFCs are documents, not sites. They may appear on a site, but they
    aren't sites as such.

    Obviously you weren't reading the correct document.

    So why doesn't that surprise me.





  11. #56
    Kurt Hamster
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:12:27 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
    <[email protected]> to say...


    >"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]...
    >> FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
    >> thread?
    >>
    >> The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and top
    >> posting.

    >
    >Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
    >crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they are
    >something special?
    >
    ><original rant attached below>



    Because you dumb ****, you are supposed to snip non relative parts of
    the message you are replying to.

    It's lazy ****wits like you who just bung a few words on top of the
    original thread that waste bandwidth.

    Sooner or later you will experience a not so subtle LART if you keep on
    with this brain dead attitude.

    ****ing newbies, it's almost as bad as the AOL "me too" of the dim and
    distant past.





  12. #57
    Gymmy Bob
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    What?

    "Kurt Hamster" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:12:27 -0400, Gymmy Bob used
    > <[email protected]> to say...
    >
    >
    > >"Phil" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > >news:[email protected]...
    > >> FFS, whats the point of top posting if you don't remove the rest of the
    > >> thread?
    > >>
    > >> The rest of the thread is useless if you insist on being an arse and

    top
    > >> posting.

    > >
    > >Your post is totally useless if you bottom post after a bunch of header
    > >crap. Who wants to scroll 100 lines to read somebody's rant unless they

    are
    > >something special?
    > >
    > ><original rant attached below>

    >
    >
    > Because you dum






  13. #58
    Robert
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    Arguing about a newsgroup post is like running in the special olympics.
    Even is you win you're still retarded.





  14. #59
    POD {Ò¿Ó}
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    Kurt Hamster <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > it's almost as bad as the AOL "me too" of the dim and
    > distant past.
    >


    Not so dim and distant, there were several hundred "me toos" to the 2004
    warez list thread.

    --
    *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
    -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*



  15. #60
    POD {Ò¿Ó}
    Guest

    Re: OT:WARNING: CItibank Scam

    "Gymmy Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > What?


    Only goes to compound the fact that you are a fecless dimwit with no
    ****ing clue.

    --
    *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- *POD {Ò¿Ó}* -:¦:-
    -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast