"Danglerb" <mikefordz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1156212575.430745.126920@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> Dunno if my phone is typical, but its something like 2.5 hours talk and
> 144 hours standby, so it doesn't take much talk to knock down the juice
> compared to standby.
>
> I don't think the carrier would matter, but I could see how maybe it
> might if it used different bands etc. Maybe somebody that actually
> knows will reply.
>
Not claiming that I'm "somebody who knows" but like the previous post
mentioned, the carrier CAN have a significant effect. If one is mostly
calling from a place with poor coverage from one operator while another one
has good coverage, the phone needs to transmit at high power in the first
case while low power is sufficient for the other.
This may also affect standby time. It is power consuming if the phone has to
change between cells frequently, compared to a case where it constantly
receives good signal from one cell.
Operators may have different parameter settings on their networks too. In
standby mode one may allow longer power saving periods while the other one
orders the phone to wake up more frequently.
There are some differences in
SIM cards too. Modern phones do not accept 5V
cards but some that did, had to provide the operating voltage with a step-up
switching regulator which consumes more power than driving a low voltage
SIM
with normal regulators. Very old
SIM cards requested a continuous clock
which prevented efficient power saving features (don't think those
SIM cards
exist any more).
Like previously mentioned, the user behaviour is very important too. One may
be playing with the phone almost unconsciously, activating display lights
(and preventing power saving modes) etc. etc. The standby current
consumption on
GSM phones is so low that any activity, even if not placing a
call, consumes power equivalent to a significant standby time.