Question regarding WLNP

I have a question about how WLNP will work. I'm currently under contract
until January. But I'm wondering what happens to my account if I port my
number in December. Does porting necessarily close my account? I wouldn't
mind paying the monthly charge for an account with no phone number attached
to it, since it's less than the ETF. Thanks in advance if anyone knows.

John wrote:

> I have a question about how WLNP will work. I'm currently under contract
> until January. But I'm wondering what happens to my account if I port my
> number in December. Does porting necessarily close my account? I
> wouldn't mind paying the monthly charge for an account with no phone
> number attached
> to it, since it's less than the ETF. Thanks in advance if anyone knows.


Once the number is ported, the old account is deactivated.

Sorry John. While it might seem reasonable to allow you to pay your account off
Through January, SprintPCS is only too happy to have an excuse to charge you an
early termination fee should you leave before the end of your contract. After
all you might have used 1000 roaming minutes in January....

DSL GURU wrote:

> Sorry John. While it might seem reasonable to allow you to pay your
> account off Through January, SprintPCS is only too happy to have an excuse
> to charge you an early termination fee should you leave before the end of
> your contract. After all you might have used 1000 roaming minutes in
> January....


This is a misrepresentation of facts- You can not have a customer being
charged twice for the same phone.

> This is a misrepresentation of facts- You can not
> have a customer being
> charged twice for the same phone.

That statement is the misrepresentation. I said no such thing.

=============
I do not work for SprintPCS
I can be honest

is that a sufficient disclaimer for you Scott?

DSL GURU wrote:

> While it might seem reasonable to allow you to pay your account off
> Through January,


Sorry, Phil, but stating that "While it might seem reasonable to allow you
to pay your account off Through January," indicates that a phone can have
charges on two different accounts in the context of the original thread.
YOU misrepresented a 'reasonable' solution that is not available anywhere.

DSL GURU <dslguru@aol.com> wrote:

> =============
> I do not work for SprintPCS
> I can be honest

Anyone care to guess which statement is false?


--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * sjsobol@JustThe.net

Steven J Sobol wrote:

> DSL GURU <dslguru@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> =============
>> I do not work for SprintPCS
>> I can be honest
>
> Anyone care to guess which statement is false?
>
>

I'm leaning towards 'all of the above'.

Scott Stephenson <scott.stephensonson@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>
>>> =============
>>> I do not work for SprintPCS
>>> I can be honest
>>
>> Anyone care to guess which statement is false?
>>
>>
>
> I'm leaning towards 'all of the above'.

Come on, Scott, you really think he works for Sprint?

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * sjsobol@JustThe.net

Steven J Sobol wrote:

> Scott Stephenson <scott.stephensonson@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> =============
>>>> I do not work for SprintPCS
>>>> I can be honest
>>>
>>> Anyone care to guess which statement is false?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm leaning towards 'all of the above'.
>
> Come on, Scott, you really think he works for Sprint?
>

More like the disgruntled ex-employee. I know where you were going with the
first post.

In article <20031108165319.28173.00000404@mb-m25.aol.com>, DSL=20
GURUdslguru@aol.com says...
> I do not work for SprintPCS
> I can be honest
>=20

Nobody's doubted you *can* be, Phill.

It's whether you *are* that's under advisement. Actually, no, it's not. Y=
ou=20
aren't.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"Steven J Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
news:W_idnUKXTqnxSzCiRVn-tA@lmi.net...
> DSL GURU <dslguru@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > =============
> > I do not work for SprintPCS
> > I can be honest
>
> Anyone care to guess which statement is false?
>
>

I think they are both false

Tom Veldhouse

In article <3fafa9e8$0$75890$a1866201@newsreader.visi.com>,
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Steven J Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
> news:W_idnUKXTqnxSzCiRVn-tA@lmi.net...
> > DSL GURU <dslguru@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > =============
> > > I do not work for SprintPCS
> > > I can be honest
> >
> > Anyone care to guess which statement is false?
> >
> >
>
> I think they are both false


DSL GURU works for SprintPCS?

"Dan Pendragon" <pendragon@poydras.com> wrote in message
newsendragon-9B524B.09550610112003@news05.east.earthlink.net...
>
>
> DSL GURU works for SprintPCS?

You mean Philippe. I think he worked for SprintPCS. I think now he is
unemployed and has had nothing better to do than slam Sprint PCS for the
last couple of months. If his real identity is ever discovered, I am sure
he won't be working in Telecom in the future.

Tom Veldhouse