Results 1 to 7 of 7
- 11-18-2003, 09:38 PM #1Spam Me PleaseGuest
Hi,
Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward the
rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The only phone
that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong signal in my house
without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these phones have the same
great reception as the sanyo 4900?
Thanks for any opinons.
Alan
› See More: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
- 11-18-2003, 10:04 PM #2SAAGuest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
I have the 5400 and so far it works great. A member of my family is
going to get one soon so wee can use the radylink (haven't got to use
that yet).
Speakerphone is loud and easy to understand the other person. Calls
are great and signal strengh is great. I am just trying to get and
extended battery right now. The regular one that came with it I had
to charge up after only two days use.
All in all a great phone. I can't wait to try the readylink.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:38:17 -0600, Spam Me Please <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
>rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward the
>rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The only phone
>that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong signal in my house
>without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these phones have the same
>great reception as the sanyo 4900?
>
>Thanks for any opinons.
>
>Alan
>
- 11-19-2003, 06:43 AM #3w.g.Guest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
Somewhere around Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:38:17 -0600, Spam Me Please was
brave enough to write:
>Hi,
>
>Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
>rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward the
>rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The only phone
>that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong signal in my house
>without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these phones have the same
>great reception as the sanyo 4900?
>
>Thanks for any opinons.
>
Got the 5400 (rl2500) . Speakerphone is great. Screen is clear and
bright. Vision is blazing fast on it , even blew my A500 out the
water. Have yet to try ready link. Downloads are fast. Sound in
earpiece from call is clear and crisp. It isn't a perfect phone , when
using a downloaded screensaver only the time shows up with the
screensaver. I want date,time and username or message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will finish what I sta --Bart Simpson
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tnpnr@mind+spring.com
remove the +
- 11-19-2003, 01:53 PM #4Isaiah BeardGuest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
Spam Me Please wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
> rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward the
> rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The only phone
> that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong signal in my house
> without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these phones have the same
> great reception as the sanyo 4900?
>
> Thanks for any opinons.
I have an RL2500, as does a friend of mine. Placed next to my old 8100,
the signal reception was slightly higher on the RL2500, and placed next
to my friend's 4900, the signal was WAY better.
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
- 11-19-2003, 03:49 PM #5Spam Me PleaseGuest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
Thanks folks for the input. Looks like everyone that answered so far
has the rl2500. I guess the rl2000 should be about the same. Anyone
has actually used the rl2000?
Thanks for the input again. I probably won't be using the push to
talk, but could add that option later.
Later
Alan
>>>>> "Isaiah" == Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> writes:
Isaiah> Spam Me Please wrote:
>> Hi, Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new
>> sanyo rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning
>> toward the rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas.
>> The only phone that I have had from sprint that could hold a
>> strong signal in my house without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do
>> these phones have the same great reception as the sanyo 4900?
>> Thanks for any opinons.
Isaiah> I have an RL2500, as does a friend of mine. Placed next to my
Isaiah> old 8100, the signal reception was slightly higher on the
Isaiah> RL2500, and placed next to my friend's 4900, the signal was
Isaiah> WAY better.
Isaiah> -- E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and
Isaiah> a's in my e-mail address to reply.
- 11-19-2003, 03:50 PM #6Spam Me PleaseGuest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
Thanks for the input.
I was reading in this newsgroup that if you disable the push to talk
option the battery life would be better. Probably a good thing to do
unless you have the PTT option.
Later
>>>>> "SAA" == SAA <[email protected]> writes:
SAA> I have the 5400 and so far it works great. A member of my family
SAA> is going to get one soon so wee can use the radylink (haven't
SAA> got to use that yet).
SAA> Speakerphone is loud and easy to understand the other person.
SAA> Calls are great and signal strengh is great. I am just trying to
SAA> get and extended battery right now. The regular one that came
SAA> with it I had to charge up after only two days use.
SAA> All in all a great phone. I can't wait to try the readylink.
SAA> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:38:17 -0600, Spam Me Please
SAA> <[email protected]>
SAA> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
>> rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward
>> the rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The
>> only phone that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong
>> signal in my house without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these
>> phones have the same great reception as the sanyo 4900?
>>
>> Thanks for any opinons.
>>
>> Alan
>>
- 11-20-2003, 12:31 AM #7Evil_ErnieGuest
Re: Anyone using the sanyo rl2500 or rl2000?
I wanted to get the rl2500 (5400) until I saw the battery life. My 8100
lasts twice as long with just the standard battery, so I guess I will stick
with that one for now.
"Spam Me Please" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hi,
Wanted to see if there were any opinons out there on the new sanyo
rl2500 or rl2000 phones. Both really look nice. I'm leaning toward the
rl2000. Mainly concerned about reception in weak areas. The only phone
that I have had from sprint that could hold a strong signal in my house
without dropping is the sanyo 4900. Do these phones have the same
great reception as the sanyo 4900?
Thanks for any opinons.
Alan
Phones Discussed Above
More Sanyo SCP-7200 / RL2000 topics | Sanyo Forum | Reviews | ||
More Sanyo SCP-5400 / RL2500 topics | Sanyo Forum | Reviews |
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.motorola
How to Network Unlock Your Samsung Galaxy S24 from Claro
in Samsung