PTT latency is 1 second

"John Eckart" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>JWP7000, I think there is something wrong with your "S" key. You may want
to look in to that.

His problem with the "S" key (though it looked like it was in working order
to me) is minor my friend..... LMAO.

Stay tuned Phil ---- stay tuned.

---

› See More: PTT latency is 1 second

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> You can choose to sit back if you choose- he won't go away. I choose not
to
> take that approach.

You boys are of course correct ---- and was thinking that depriving the
troll of food would work. That said I'll be taking an entirely different,
less public, approach to this than what I was blubbering about the previous
few days, and use technology as the fiend it's always proven to be.

Or, to put it another way, there's more than one way to skin a troll.

Ehhhh! Wrong, I have ten nextel i88s phones and I can be sitting right
next to a person with a phone and it rings as user not available. It
does this at least 10% of the time. Further Nextel knows of serious
data issues with their data network and its latency. Sometimes 17+
seconds receive a response from a tower after ping command. Nextel is
by no means that cat's meow. Don't even get me started about their
complete lack of customer service (only till 9:00 pm weekdays, 8-5 on
Sat. and NOTHING on Sundays.)

> User Not Available means the user is busy using the phone (Phone, PTT,
> Net, etc.) or their phone is ringing.
> Nextel has the most intelligent network I've ever seen.
> There are no facts in your statement.


"John Eckart" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> User Not Available means the user is busy using the phone (Phone, PTT,
> Net, etc.) or their phone is ringing.
> Nextel has the most intelligent network I've ever seen.
> There are no facts in your statement.
>
> "Craig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > A few second latency on set up is better than the Nextel (CO: USER NOT
> > AVAILABLE) one second, and then available the next second because of a
> > bad network design or capacity limitation with IDEN. At least thats
> > how I look at it....
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Big Poppa" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > > You know if you read you own post, the INITIAL connection may take a
> few
> > > seconds, That when the person if first trying to get to the other
> person.
> > > once the main connection has been established, the latency is around
> 1 -2
> > > seconds if even that. And no were in your "quote" of Sprint PCS did
> they say
> > > "It's not ready yet"
> > >
> > > "DSL GURU" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > nice try

I agree! I had Nextel before and Sprints Ready Link is so much better that
Nextel's Direct Connect. With Nextel you can not connect I say about 25% of
the time will full signal. It blocks out in the middle of the conversation and
not to mention their cell service sucks. Sprint is going to take alot of
customers from Nextel. Stocks are going to go up!

Must be your area.

"Antonio" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
> I agree! I had Nextel before and Sprints Ready Link is so much better =
that
> Nextel's Direct Connect. With Nextel you can not connect I say about =
25% of
> the time will full signal. It blocks out in the middle of the =
conversation and
> not to mention their cell service sucks. Sprint is going to take alot =
of
> customers from Nextel. Stocks are going to go up!

in your area you have good Nextel coverage. I went to a Nextel store in the
boulevard mall in las vegas and the store manager has a sanyo 4900 on his side.
That should be telling you something vegas coverage with Nextel

Actually, the SPCS quote you posted said 'may not be appropriate'.

You're such a ****ing liar.

[email protected] (DSL GURU) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Sprint said its not suitable for emergency services. Enough said.

In article=20
<[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Actually, the SPCS quote you posted said 'may not be appropriate'.
>=20
> You're such a ****ing liar.
>=20

Silly you. Do not question THE HOLY GOSPEL ACCORDING TO=20
WEEKEND SUNSHINE/DSL GURU/PHILIPPE/MILTON SEARLES...

Don't you know that by now?

If a screwdriver doesn't hammer a nail, then, obviously,=20
it's defective. Especially if that dogmatist can claim=20
it's Sprint's fault.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

Alias for Smith wrote:


> " PCS Ready Link may not be appropriate for use by providers of
> emergency services. It will take several seconds to establish the
> initial PCS Ready Link connection; users may experience slight delays
> in subsequent "in session" communications.

<Heavily snipped for the sake of addressing a single point>

This statement is a liability dodge. You see the same thing in software
licenses. They're not saying that their service is a bad service, that
it's not useful; they want to make sure that they set a proper level of
expectation for the fault-tolerance of the product. Look at Sun's Java
licenses. They often include sections that prohibit using Java in:
Nuclear Facilities
Medical Equipment
Weapons Systems
And other systems whose failure could cause great financial or physical
injury. Sun's Java is a great way of putting an application on just
about any computing device, so it's still a good product.

Same for ReadyLink. SPCS wants people to know that the service is good,
and that you can talk to other people, but you should look at other
options if lives depend on your ability to do so.

Makes me wonder about the Nextel product placement in SWAT. But then
again, that's Hollywood.
-mike

In article <[email protected]>,
Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alias for Smith wrote:
>
>
> > " PCS Ready Link may not be appropriate for use by providers of
> > emergency services. It will take several seconds to establish the
> > initial PCS Ready Link connection; users may experience slight delays
> > in subsequent "in session" communications.



Nextel has no such Statement about it's service.

Chris McFarland wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Alias for Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>" PCS Ready Link may not be appropriate for use by providers of
>>>emergency services. It will take several seconds to establish the
>>>initial PCS Ready Link connection; users may experience slight delays
>>>in subsequent "in session" communications.
>
>
>
>
> Nextel has no such Statement about it's service.

It would appear you're right there. While I'd suspect a big part of it
is that SPCS lawyers said "look, we don't want that kind of liability"
it would also appear that Nextel has no problem with that market. Look
at this press release, entitled "Good Housekeeping Selects Nextel's
Nationwide Direct Connect Walkie-talkie Service as Most Reliable for
Emergency Communications"

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....lar&id=458320&


-mike

"Mike" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> It would appear you're right there. While I'd suspect a big part of it
> is that SPCS lawyers said "look, we don't want that kind of liability"
> it would also appear that Nextel has no problem with that market. Look
> at this press release, entitled "Good Housekeeping Selects Nextel's
> Nationwide Direct Connect Walkie-talkie Service as Most Reliable for
> Emergency Communications"
>
>
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....lar&id=458320&
>
>
Nextel uses a totally different technology than either Verizon or Sprint,
and is hands down the best. Sprint seems to be running a close second,
which is going to be very good for the customer in the long run.