Port: Cingular -> Sprint...two weeks and counting

O/Siris <robjvargas@spr=EEntpcs.c=F4m> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,=20
> Wild [email protected] says...
>>=20
>> There was, indeed, no testing. Certainly if code was written so
>> poorly that it couldn't be backed out.=20=20
>>=20

> You're responding to yourself all over again. Do you=20
> *really* think people don't see it?

I wonder how much the operation ran him and if she was able to talk his
insurance carrier into any deals? LOL Sorry.....

---

› See More: Port: Cingular -> Sprint...two weeks and counting

In article <[email protected]>,=20
Mark E. [email protected] says...
>=20
> I wonder how much the operation ran him and if she was able to talk his
> insurance carrier into any deals? LOL Sorry.....
>=20

Let's see, one female personality among 40... Dang, maybe=20
they only charged him 2% of the normal fee for the change.

He's got, what, 7 more before they get their money's worth=20
on it?

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.cōm> wrote:

> In article <dlandsdowne-45C993.06135012122003
> @news02.west.earthlink.net>, [email protected]
> says...
> > Apparently the Sprint WLNP CSRs have the same 6 minute Handle Time
> > restraints. I watched someone get tranferred, disconnected and hung-up
> > on Tuesday like clockwork at 6 minute intervals.
> >
>
> You watched? From where?


In a colleague's office over lunch time while he was calling.
Typical SprintPCS apologist. Covering up. You know there are Handle
Times constraints.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.cōm> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> Wild [email protected] says...
> >
> > There was, indeed, no testing. Certainly if code was written so
> > poorly that it couldn't be backed out.
> >
>
> You're responding to yourself all over again. Do you
> *really* think people don't see it?


Princess - ignore this blind apologist who frequently contradicts
himself.

David wrote:


>>You're responding to yourself all over again. Do you
>>*really* think people don't see it?
>
>
>
> Princess - ignore this blind apologist who frequently contradicts
> himself.

What a nut case, Princess huh ?
Well Phill looks like your dating yourself .

In article <dlandsdowne-ACF38D.04321113122003
@news02.west.earthlink.net>, [email protected]=20
says...
> In a colleague's office over lunch time while he was calling.
> Typical SprintPCS apologist. Covering up. You know there are Handle=20
> Times constraints.
>=20

I've never said there weren't, Phill. And you timed every=20
single transfer, huh? SURE you did, Phill. Just like you=20
"proved" every other national carrier honors holidays as if=20
they were weekend minutes.

How is it that you can lie that blatantly and still think=20
anyone believes what you're spewing into this newsgroup?

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <dlandsdowne-ACF38D.04321113122003
> @news02.west.earthlink.net>, [email protected]
> says...
> > In a colleague's office over lunch time while he was calling.
> > Typical SprintPCS apologist. Covering up. You know there are Handle
> > Times constraints.
> >
>
> I've never said there weren't,

But the other SprintPCS apologists in here are always denying there's
such an issue.

I just ported two phones from Nextel to Sprint. The whole thing tool about
three and half days to complete. My Nextel worked until the Sprint became
active and I never missed a beat. My only concern is the 100 or so numbers
in my address book that I have to manually transfer over, but I think if
people just relax and give it a chance this new technology will work. BTW,
reception on sprint is much better than Nextel in my area, South Fla.

In article <dlandsdowne-26DD8A.11104512122003
@news02.west.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> Total nonsense. What I would expect from a loyal Sprint employee with=20
> rose colored glasses. Truth is SprintPCS was pushing out press releases=
=20
> all last month bragging on how they tested out portability and had no=20
> problems.
>=20
> And earlier This same Sprint employee was saying SprintPCS had so few=20
> problems.
>=20

You'd be a whole lot more interesting, Phil, and not so vulnerable to=20
belittlement, if you made even a **little** effort to be honest.

I have **never** claimed there were no problems. You were the one=20
making all the claims, none of which have borne out to be true.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:


> I have **never** claimed there were no problems.


Exactly. SprintPCS has so many problems, and thats why its
rated DEAD LAST in customer service.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> But the other SprintPCS apologists in here are always denying there's=20
> such an issue.
>=20
>=20

Oh, hi, Phill. Another ID, I see. Show me. They've reported,=20
accurately, that your description of those problems is wrong. That does=20
NOT mean they deny problems exist.

The most clear example of this is your description of Mr Sobol as an=20
apologist, even though he is the victim of what he thinks is a very=20
fundamental flaw in our billing system when a customer moves to a new=20
area code.

In fact, Phill, despite your claims, NO ONE is denying that SPCS has=20
problems. I've even agreed that at least some of them are big ones.

Disagreement with your bigotry is *not* denial.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"Joseph, the cowardly Village Idiot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I have **never** claimed there were no problems.
>
>
> Exactly. SprintPCS has so many problems, and thats why its
> rated DEAD LAST in customer service.

Sure they are- based on old and outdated survey results. Show us something
more recent than a six month okd survey.

Add another name to it's list.

Leonard wrote:

> But the other SprintPCS apologists in here are always denying there's
> such an issue.

Joseph wrote:

> Exactly. SprintPCS has so many problems, and thats why its
> rated DEAD LAST in customer service.

And the fact that you change as often as you do is why your
Credibility is nonexistent.

> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I have **never** claimed there were no problems.
>


Exactly. SprintPCS has so many problems, and thats why its
rated DEAD LAST in customer service.