Results 1 to 9 of 9
- 01-15-2004, 05:23 PM #1Scott StephensonGuest
Sprint sees 2M '04 mobile addition (old news, I know)
http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/06/technology/sprint.reut/
BTW- I noticed the stock closed at a 52 week high today, Phil. I guess your
doom and gloom was just a bunch of hot air.
And how are the hold times over at ATT?
› See More: This one's for Phil
- 01-15-2004, 05:29 PM #2Bob SmithGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Sprint sees 2M '04 mobile addition (old news, I know)
> http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/06/technology/sprint.reut/
>
> BTW- I noticed the stock closed at a 52 week high today, Phil. I guess
your
> doom and gloom was just a bunch of hot air.
>
> And how are the hold times over at ATT?
Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he said
he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly T-Mobile.
Can't be sure though ...
Bob
- 01-15-2004, 06:31 PM #3Scott StephensonGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > Sprint sees 2M '04 mobile addition (old news, I know)
> > http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/06/technology/sprint.reut/
> >
> > BTW- I noticed the stock closed at a 52 week high today, Phil. I guess
> your
> > doom and gloom was just a bunch of hot air.
> >
> > And how are the hold times over at ATT?
>
> Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he
said
> he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly
T-Mobile.
> Can't be sure though ...
Oh, please let it be true. Further evidence that research is not a strength
he possesses.
- 01-16-2004, 07:54 AM #4Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:29:19 GMT, "Bob Smith"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he said
>he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly T-Mobile.
>Can't be sure though ...
>
>Bob
>
He probably came back to Sprint PCS! That is why he remains quiet ...
he has been humbled
Tom Veldhouse
- 01-16-2004, 12:41 PM #5Isaiah BeardGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
Bob Smith wrote:
>
> Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he said
> he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly T-Mobile.
> Can't be sure though ...
>
> Bob
Wow, I guess I'm going to have to start watching the voicestream/t-mo
group. Considering I've recommended Sprint to a lot of T-mobile
defectors, I don't think he'll be very happy there, either.
--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.
- 01-16-2004, 03:54 PM #6Scott StephensonGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:29:19 GMT, "Bob Smith"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he
said
> >he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly
T-Mobile.
> >Can't be sure though ...
> >
> >Bob
> >
>
> He probably came back to Sprint PCS! That is why he remains quiet ...
> he has been humbled
>
>
I'm thinking it might be Verizon. He's been posting a lot there as of late,
and just got spanked over there for posting inaccurate stuff (imagine that).
Some things never change.
- 01-18-2004, 09:58 AM #7Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:54:30 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:29:19 GMT, "Bob Smith"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Is he still at ATTW? I thought I saw a post a week or so ago, where he said
>>he moved, once again, as he was so P.O'ed @ ATTW, ... to possibly T-Mobile.
>>Can't be sure though ...
>>
>>Bob
>>
>
>He probably came back to Sprint PCS! That is why he remains quiet ...
>he has been humbled
>
>
>Tom Veldhouse
As it turns out, he has been posting here using the name Robert M. He
has had reason to be calling Sprint PCS customer service and even
claims to have been connected to the Phillipines. Hmm ... what does a
non-customer need with Sprint PCS customer service ... unless he
ported his number back.
Tom Veldhouse
- 01-20-2004, 02:22 AM #8O/SirisGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
In article <[email protected]>,=20
Thomas T. [email protected] says...
> As it turns out, he has been posting here using the name Robert M. He
> has had reason to be calling Sprint PCS customer service and even
> claims to have been connected to the Phillipines. Hmm ... what does a
> non-customer need with Sprint PCS customer service ... unless he
> ported his number back.
>=20
> Tom Veldhouse
>=20
That *is* interesting. Let's just say there's a connection=20
between porting into SPCS and The Philippines.
--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.
- 01-20-2004, 05:30 PM #9Scott StephensonGuest
Re: This one's for Phil
"O/Siris" <0sīrīs@sprīntpcs.cōm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
Thomas T. [email protected] says...
> As it turns out, he has been posting here using the name Robert M. He
> has had reason to be calling Sprint PCS customer service and even
> claims to have been connected to the Phillipines. Hmm ... what does a
> non-customer need with Sprint PCS customer service ... unless he
> ported his number back.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
That *is* interesting. Let's just say there's a connection
between porting into SPCS and The Philippines.
Oh, this is just too good for words. The idiot jerk-off comes back to the
sandbox once again.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Games
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Sony Ericsson
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
What are the best ways to retain employees of your company?
in Chit Chat