NNTP-Posting-Host: mango.cc.columbia.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu 1075667185 21030 128.59.59.104 (1 Feb 2004 20:26:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
postmaster@columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Feb 2004 20:26:25 GMT
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <MPG.1a8681f4c22ff62298982d@netnews.comcast.net>
Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.sprintpcs:132461
O/Siris wrote:
> In article <bvh3mt$k59$1@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>, mark@columbia.edu
> says...
>
>>or how about "Why do we need to run an updater to upgrade apps at all?"
>>
>
>
> It's not upgrading anything. It's patching a found flaw in a way that's
> even faster than issuing a network upgrade.
>
it's not about upgrading anything? what does "fix problems with blazer
and cookies" (on the sprint web site) mean to you? what flaw does
it patch? i realize from reading your posts that you tend to be both
helpful and detailed, but the silence about this update is driving
me nuts.
my treo isn't a "black box" that sprint administers.
it's a $400 investment in hardware and software made by me.
i want to know the details. i need to know the details.
the only way to offset the problems caused by the still relativley
crude environment offered by palm's OS (no virtual memory
protection) is to go "open kimono" with the details. that
way people can help themselves.
/mark